{"title":"Initial safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: real world evidence from a tertiary centre.","authors":"Sailantra Sivathasan, Lit Kiat Tan, Brayan Samuel, Chandrarajan Shah, Chigozie Onyeze, Amit Kalpee","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2026.14705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in managing benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) in a single tertiary centre.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on a single tertiary hospital in which data was collected from electronic medical records which includes demographic information, preoperative characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes; complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were analysed in this study, with a mean prostate volume of 109.3 ± 47.2 ml. The mean change in post void residual volume (PVR) was (-)75%, whilst the mean change in maximum flow rate (QMax) was (+)109%. 21/104 (19%) patients presented with post-operative complications, the majority of these (13) were Grade I complications with three patients being Grade III. Increasing age (p = 0.014) was shown to have contributed to complications. Pre-operative anticoagulation was shown to yield no significance (p = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HoLEP remains a viable treatment modality for BPH especially in larger prostates (> 100 ml). However, considerations regarding post-operative outcomes should be taken when offering this treatment to more elderly patients. Additionally, HoLEP provides a good treatment option for patients on anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"14705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in managing benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) in a single tertiary centre.
Materials & methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on a single tertiary hospital in which data was collected from electronic medical records which includes demographic information, preoperative characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes; complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.
Results: 104 patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were analysed in this study, with a mean prostate volume of 109.3 ± 47.2 ml. The mean change in post void residual volume (PVR) was (-)75%, whilst the mean change in maximum flow rate (QMax) was (+)109%. 21/104 (19%) patients presented with post-operative complications, the majority of these (13) were Grade I complications with three patients being Grade III. Increasing age (p = 0.014) was shown to have contributed to complications. Pre-operative anticoagulation was shown to yield no significance (p = 0.066).
Conclusion: HoLEP remains a viable treatment modality for BPH especially in larger prostates (> 100 ml). However, considerations regarding post-operative outcomes should be taken when offering this treatment to more elderly patients. Additionally, HoLEP provides a good treatment option for patients on anticoagulation.