Initial safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: real world evidence from a tertiary centre.

IF 1.3 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Sailantra Sivathasan, Lit Kiat Tan, Brayan Samuel, Chandrarajan Shah, Chigozie Onyeze, Amit Kalpee
{"title":"Initial safety and efficacy of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate: real world evidence from a tertiary centre.","authors":"Sailantra Sivathasan, Lit Kiat Tan, Brayan Samuel, Chandrarajan Shah, Chigozie Onyeze, Amit Kalpee","doi":"10.4081/aiua.2026.14705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in managing benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) in a single tertiary centre.</p><p><strong>Materials & methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on a single tertiary hospital in which data was collected from electronic medical records which includes demographic information, preoperative characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes; complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>104 patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were analysed in this study, with a mean prostate volume of 109.3 ± 47.2 ml. The mean change in post void residual volume (PVR) was (-)75%, whilst the mean change in maximum flow rate (QMax) was (+)109%. 21/104 (19%) patients presented with post-operative complications, the majority of these (13) were Grade I complications with three patients being Grade III. Increasing age (p = 0.014) was shown to have contributed to complications. Pre-operative anticoagulation was shown to yield no significance (p = 0.066).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>HoLEP remains a viable treatment modality for BPH especially in larger prostates (> 100 ml). However, considerations regarding post-operative outcomes should be taken when offering this treatment to more elderly patients. Additionally, HoLEP provides a good treatment option for patients on anticoagulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":46900,"journal":{"name":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","volume":" ","pages":"14705"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivio Italiano di Urologia e Andrologia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/aiua.2026.14705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the initial safety and efficacy of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) in managing benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) in a single tertiary centre.

Materials & methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted focusing on a single tertiary hospital in which data was collected from electronic medical records which includes demographic information, preoperative characteristics, surgical details, and post-operative outcomes; complications were classified using the Clavien-Dindo classification.

Results: 104 patients with BPH and lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) were analysed in this study, with a mean prostate volume of 109.3 ± 47.2 ml. The mean change in post void residual volume (PVR) was (-)75%, whilst the mean change in maximum flow rate (QMax) was (+)109%. 21/104 (19%) patients presented with post-operative complications, the majority of these (13) were Grade I complications with three patients being Grade III. Increasing age (p = 0.014) was shown to have contributed to complications. Pre-operative anticoagulation was shown to yield no significance (p = 0.066).

Conclusion: HoLEP remains a viable treatment modality for BPH especially in larger prostates (> 100 ml). However, considerations regarding post-operative outcomes should be taken when offering this treatment to more elderly patients. Additionally, HoLEP provides a good treatment option for patients on anticoagulation.

钬激光前列腺去核术的初始安全性和有效性:来自三级中心的真实世界证据。
目的:本研究旨在评估在单一三级中心进行钬切除前列腺(HoLEP)治疗良性前列腺肥大(BPH)的初步安全性和有效性。材料与方法:以一家三级医院为研究对象进行回顾性队列研究,数据收集自电子病历,包括人口统计信息、术前特征、手术细节和术后结果;并发症采用Clavien-Dindo分类法进行分类。结果:本研究共分析了104例前列腺增生伴下尿路症状(LUTS)患者,平均前列腺体积为109.3±47.2 ml,空腔后残留体积(PVR)平均变化(-)75%,最大流速(QMax)平均变化(+)109%。21/104(19%)患者出现术后并发症,其中大部分(13)为I级并发症,3例为III级并发症。年龄增加(p = 0.014)会导致并发症的发生。术前抗凝效果无统计学意义(p = 0.066)。结论:HoLEP仍然是治疗前列腺增生的一种可行的方式,特别是在较大的前列腺(100毫升)。然而,在为更多的老年患者提供这种治疗时,应考虑到术后结果。此外,HoLEP为抗凝患者提供了良好的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
35.70%
发文量
72
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书