Independence, inclusion, and uncertainty: voices of caregivers of youth with CHARGE syndrome on assistive technology and virtual reality.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 REHABILITATION
Pamela Beach, Samantha Leung, Afeez Hazzan, Lauren Lieberman, Nicole Ness
{"title":"Independence, inclusion, and uncertainty: voices of caregivers of youth with CHARGE syndrome on assistive technology and virtual reality.","authors":"Pamela Beach, Samantha Leung, Afeez Hazzan, Lauren Lieberman, Nicole Ness","doi":"10.1080/17483107.2026.2667443","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting youth with CHARGE syndrome, yet little is known about how they perceive and evaluate emerging assistive technologies such as virtual reality. This study explored caregiver perspectives to better understand how technology is conceptualised, the types of exposure families have experienced, and the perceived benefits and concerns that shape adoption.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Semi‑structured interviews were conducted with thirteen caregivers of young adults with CHARGE syndrome during the 16th International CHARGE Syndrome Conference in July 2025. Using qualitative descriptive methodology, transcripts were analysed to identify themes related to caregiver decision‑making, sensory and physical considerations, and the broader context in which assistive technology use is negotiated.</p><p><strong>Findings: </strong>Caregivers described assistive technology in diverse ways, ranging from \"fake\" or entertainment‑based to culturally enriching and potentially educational. Most reported limited exposure, often through arcades or school programs, which shaped cautious attitudes towards adoption. While caregivers anticipated benefits such as increased independence, skill‑building, and social participation, they also expressed concerns about sensory overload, headset comfort, cost, and accessibility. Decision‑making was influenced by practical constraints, philosophical beliefs, and the perceived balance between caregiver burden and child autonomy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Findings highlight the complexity of caregiver perspectives on assistive technology for youth with CHARGE syndrome. Understanding how caregivers conceptualise, experience, and weigh benefits against concerns can inform the design and dissemination of technologies that are responsive to family needs. These insights provide a foundation for future research and development aimed at enhancing accessibility and supporting caregiver decision‑making.</p>","PeriodicalId":47806,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Rehabilitation-Assistive Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17483107.2026.2667443","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Family caregivers play a critical role in supporting youth with CHARGE syndrome, yet little is known about how they perceive and evaluate emerging assistive technologies such as virtual reality. This study explored caregiver perspectives to better understand how technology is conceptualised, the types of exposure families have experienced, and the perceived benefits and concerns that shape adoption.

Materials and methods: Semi‑structured interviews were conducted with thirteen caregivers of young adults with CHARGE syndrome during the 16th International CHARGE Syndrome Conference in July 2025. Using qualitative descriptive methodology, transcripts were analysed to identify themes related to caregiver decision‑making, sensory and physical considerations, and the broader context in which assistive technology use is negotiated.

Findings: Caregivers described assistive technology in diverse ways, ranging from "fake" or entertainment‑based to culturally enriching and potentially educational. Most reported limited exposure, often through arcades or school programs, which shaped cautious attitudes towards adoption. While caregivers anticipated benefits such as increased independence, skill‑building, and social participation, they also expressed concerns about sensory overload, headset comfort, cost, and accessibility. Decision‑making was influenced by practical constraints, philosophical beliefs, and the perceived balance between caregiver burden and child autonomy.

Conclusion: Findings highlight the complexity of caregiver perspectives on assistive technology for youth with CHARGE syndrome. Understanding how caregivers conceptualise, experience, and weigh benefits against concerns can inform the design and dissemination of technologies that are responsive to family needs. These insights provide a foundation for future research and development aimed at enhancing accessibility and supporting caregiver decision‑making.

独立、包容与不确定性:CHARGE综合征青少年照顾者对辅助技术和虚拟现实的看法
目的:家庭照顾者在支持青少年CHARGE综合征方面发挥着关键作用,但他们如何看待和评估新兴的辅助技术(如虚拟现实)却知之甚少。本研究探讨了护理人员的观点,以更好地理解技术是如何概念化的,家庭所经历的暴露类型,以及影响采用的感知利益和担忧。材料和方法:在2025年7月第16届国际CHARGE综合征会议期间,对13名青年CHARGE综合征护理人员进行了半结构化访谈。使用定性描述方法,对记录进行分析,以确定与护理人员决策、感官和身体考虑以及协商辅助技术使用的更广泛背景相关的主题。研究结果:护理人员以不同的方式描述辅助技术,从“假”或基于娱乐的到文化丰富和潜在的教育。大多数报告的接触有限,通常是通过游乐场或学校项目,这形成了对收养的谨慎态度。虽然护理人员期望提高独立性、技能培养和社会参与等好处,但他们也表达了对感官超载、耳机舒适度、成本和可及性的担忧。决策受到实际约束、哲学信仰以及照顾者负担和儿童自主之间的感知平衡的影响。结论:研究结果突出了护理人员对青少年CHARGE综合征辅助技术的复杂性。了解照顾者如何概念化、体验和权衡利益与关切,可以为设计和传播符合家庭需求的技术提供信息。这些见解为未来旨在提高可及性和支持护理人员决策的研究和开发奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
13.60%
发文量
128
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书