Integrating Emergency Medical Services Into Health Systems for Continuous and Resilient Care.

IF 4.1 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS Pub Date : 2026-04-22 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/phrs.2026.1609282
Gina Marie Gerlach, Sarah Maria Esther Jerjen, Armin Gemperli
{"title":"Integrating Emergency Medical Services Into Health Systems for Continuous and Resilient Care.","authors":"Gina Marie Gerlach, Sarah Maria Esther Jerjen, Armin Gemperli","doi":"10.3389/phrs.2026.1609282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are central to acute care, disaster response, and public health. Yet prehospital data in many systems remain disconnected from hospital and follow-up outcomes. This paper examines how fragmented, unidirectional data flows limit quality assurance, system learning, and crisis preparedness, using Switzerland as an illustrative case.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analyze data flows across the rescue chain based on regulatory context, current handover practices, and international reference models. The analysis is supported by existing registry initiatives and a conceptual systems framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Across EMS systems, information is generated in silos and transferred through brief handovers without systematic outcome feedback. Evaluation is therefore reduced to operational metrics such as response times, obscuring the clinical impact of prehospital care. In Switzerland, decentralized governance and the absence of national standards reinforce these dynamics. Existing registries demonstrate that outcome tracking is feasible using minimal standardized datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Bidirectional EMS data exchange is essential to transform linear rescue chains into learning health systems. A national EMS minimum dataset with mandatory reporting and outcome feedback would enable transparency, quality improvement, and resilient emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":35944,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS","volume":"47 ","pages":"1609282"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13143843/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/phrs.2026.1609282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Emergency Medical Services (EMS) are central to acute care, disaster response, and public health. Yet prehospital data in many systems remain disconnected from hospital and follow-up outcomes. This paper examines how fragmented, unidirectional data flows limit quality assurance, system learning, and crisis preparedness, using Switzerland as an illustrative case.

Methods: We analyze data flows across the rescue chain based on regulatory context, current handover practices, and international reference models. The analysis is supported by existing registry initiatives and a conceptual systems framework.

Results: Across EMS systems, information is generated in silos and transferred through brief handovers without systematic outcome feedback. Evaluation is therefore reduced to operational metrics such as response times, obscuring the clinical impact of prehospital care. In Switzerland, decentralized governance and the absence of national standards reinforce these dynamics. Existing registries demonstrate that outcome tracking is feasible using minimal standardized datasets.

Conclusion: Bidirectional EMS data exchange is essential to transform linear rescue chains into learning health systems. A national EMS minimum dataset with mandatory reporting and outcome feedback would enable transparency, quality improvement, and resilient emergency care.

将紧急医疗服务纳入卫生系统,实现持续和有弹性的护理。
目标:紧急医疗服务(EMS)对急症护理、灾难应对和公共卫生至关重要。然而,许多系统的院前数据仍然与医院和随访结果脱节。本文考察了碎片化、单向的数据流如何限制质量保证、系统学习和危机准备,并以瑞士为例进行了说明。方法:基于监管背景、当前移交实践和国际参考模型,我们分析了整个救援链的数据流。该分析得到现有注册中心计划和概念系统框架的支持。结果:在整个EMS系统中,信息是在孤岛中产生的,通过简短的交接传递,没有系统的结果反馈。因此,评估被简化为响应时间等业务指标,模糊了院前护理的临床影响。在瑞士,分散的管理和缺乏国家标准加强了这些动态。现有的注册证明,使用最小的标准化数据集进行结果跟踪是可行的。结论:双向EMS数据交换对于将线性救援链转变为学习型卫生系统至关重要。具有强制性报告和结果反馈的国家EMS最低数据集将实现透明度、质量改进和弹性紧急护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS
PUBLIC HEALTH REVIEWS Nursing-Community and Home Care
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
47
审稿时长
5 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书