Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of remnant gastric cancer: a comparative study of minimally invasive approaches.

IF 0.8 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Nasser Alrashidi
{"title":"Clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of remnant gastric cancer: a comparative study of minimally invasive approaches.","authors":"Nasser Alrashidi","doi":"10.23736/S2724-5691.26.11078-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Remnant gastric cancer (RGC), a malignancy arising in the gastric stump after partial gastrectomy, presents unique diagnostic and surgical challenges. The aim of the study is to recognize the clinicopathologic characteristics of the florescent (FL) and non-FL groups in RGC patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of 68 patients with RGC from 2014 to 2024 who underwent curative resection, comparing two distinct minimally invasive surgical approaches: the FL group (N.=31) and the non-FL group (N.=37). Baseline demographics, prior gastrectomy history, and tumor characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The only statistically significant difference observed was in the operation method, with the FL group showing a significantly higher proportion of robotic-assisted surgery (61.3% vs. 24.3%, P=0.002). Although the FL group had a longer mean operation time (275.0 vs. 251.7 minutes, P=0.163), it demonstrated favorable trends toward lower estimated blood loss (100 vs. 120 mL, P=0.098) and shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7 days, P=0.089). Postoperative complication rates and mortality were similar and acceptable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>These findings suggest that while the FL approach, characterized by a higher utilization of robotic technology, is associated with a longer operative duration, it may offer marginal benefits in perioperative metrics for the complex surgery of RGC, underscoring the feasibility and safety of advanced minimally invasive techniques in this challenging patient population.</p>","PeriodicalId":29847,"journal":{"name":"Minerva Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-5691.26.11078-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC), a malignancy arising in the gastric stump after partial gastrectomy, presents unique diagnostic and surgical challenges. The aim of the study is to recognize the clinicopathologic characteristics of the florescent (FL) and non-FL groups in RGC patients.

Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinicopathologic characteristics and surgical outcomes of 68 patients with RGC from 2014 to 2024 who underwent curative resection, comparing two distinct minimally invasive surgical approaches: the FL group (N.=31) and the non-FL group (N.=37). Baseline demographics, prior gastrectomy history, and tumor characteristics were comparable between the two cohorts.

Results: The only statistically significant difference observed was in the operation method, with the FL group showing a significantly higher proportion of robotic-assisted surgery (61.3% vs. 24.3%, P=0.002). Although the FL group had a longer mean operation time (275.0 vs. 251.7 minutes, P=0.163), it demonstrated favorable trends toward lower estimated blood loss (100 vs. 120 mL, P=0.098) and shorter hospital stay (6 vs. 7 days, P=0.089). Postoperative complication rates and mortality were similar and acceptable in both groups.

Conclusions: These findings suggest that while the FL approach, characterized by a higher utilization of robotic technology, is associated with a longer operative duration, it may offer marginal benefits in perioperative metrics for the complex surgery of RGC, underscoring the feasibility and safety of advanced minimally invasive techniques in this challenging patient population.

残余胃癌的临床病理特点及手术效果:微创入路的比较研究。
背景:残胃癌(RGC)是胃部分切除术后发生在残胃的一种恶性肿瘤,具有独特的诊断和手术挑战。本研究的目的是了解RGC患者中荧光(FL)组和非FL组的临床病理特征。方法:回顾性分析2014 - 2024年行根治性切除的68例RGC患者的临床病理特征和手术效果,比较FL组(31例)和非FL组(37例)两种不同的微创手术入路。基线人口统计学、既往胃切除术史和肿瘤特征在两个队列之间具有可比性。结果:手术方式差异有统计学意义,FL组采用机器人辅助手术的比例明显高于前者(61.3% vs. 24.3%, P=0.002)。虽然FL组平均手术时间较长(275.0 vs. 251.7分钟,P=0.163),但其估计失血量较低(100 vs. 120 mL, P=0.098),住院时间较短(6 vs. 7天,P=0.089)。两组术后并发症发生率和死亡率相似,均可接受。结论:这些研究结果表明,虽然FL入路的特点是机器人技术的利用率更高,手术时间更长,但它可能在RGC复杂手术的围手术期指标中提供边际效益,强调了先进微创技术在这一具有挑战性的患者群体中的可行性和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Minerva Surgery
Minerva Surgery SURGERY-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
320
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书