Anterior approach with liver hanging maneuver vs conventional approach in major hepatic resections: can 3D visualization technology affect complex surgical maneuvers?

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
C Cotsoglou, G Pugliese, S Granieri, G M Ettorre, F Izzo, F Panaro, R Memeo, E Gjoni, A Germini, B Torre, G Berardi, S Caringi, M Maione, E Tessitore, E M Muttillo, M Puglia, A Di Lucia, M Cavicchioli, A V Gatti
{"title":"Anterior approach with liver hanging maneuver vs conventional approach in major hepatic resections: can 3D visualization technology affect complex surgical maneuvers?","authors":"C Cotsoglou, G Pugliese, S Granieri, G M Ettorre, F Izzo, F Panaro, R Memeo, E Gjoni, A Germini, B Torre, G Berardi, S Caringi, M Maione, E Tessitore, E M Muttillo, M Puglia, A Di Lucia, M Cavicchioli, A V Gatti","doi":"10.1007/s13304-026-02662-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The anterior approach (AA) with liver hanging maneuver (LHM) has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional approach (CA) for major hepatectomies. Despite its potential advantages, LHM remains underutilized, partly due to concerns about vascular injury and tumor rupture. Three-dimensional visualization technology (3DVT) may improve anatomical comprehension and inform preoperative decision-making in selecting surgical strategies. We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients undergoing major hepatic resections (right/left hepatectomy and right posterior sectionectomy) between 2019 and 2024. Four expert hepatobiliary surgeons (HPB) and four postgraduate surgical trainees (PGY5) independently assessed surgical strategy based on 2D imaging, followed by reevaluation with 3D reconstructions. Patient-specific 3D structures were generated using an AI-assisted segmentation pipeline and systematically revised by physician specialists, a board-certified abdominal radiologist and two hepatobiliary surgeons. Intra-rater concordance was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. Primary endpoint was the rate and directionality of surgical plan modifications due to 3DVT. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes and segmentation performance metrics. 3DVT prompted significant changes in surgical planning, particularly in assessing LHM feasibility. Trainees exhibited a higher proportion of positive shifts in decision-making (No → Yes: 17.6%) compared to experts (10.8%), whereas experts more frequently reversed previously affirmative decisions (Yes → No: 9.5%). In select raters, negative Kappa values indicated systematic reassessment driven by 3D data. No significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, transfusion rate, complications, or mortality were observed between AA + LHM and CA cohorts. 3D segmentation achieved high concordance with manual ground truth (median Dice similarity coefficient for liver parenchyma: 0.98). 3DVT exerts a quantifiable influence on preoperative strategy, particularly for complex hepatic resections. It facilitates surgical planning among trainees and enhances precision among experienced surgeons. Integration of 3DVT may support safer adoption of technically demanding maneuvers such as LHM, especially in minimally invasive settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":23391,"journal":{"name":"Updates in Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Updates in Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13304-026-02662-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The anterior approach (AA) with liver hanging maneuver (LHM) has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional approach (CA) for major hepatectomies. Despite its potential advantages, LHM remains underutilized, partly due to concerns about vascular injury and tumor rupture. Three-dimensional visualization technology (3DVT) may improve anatomical comprehension and inform preoperative decision-making in selecting surgical strategies. We retrospectively analyzed 20 patients undergoing major hepatic resections (right/left hepatectomy and right posterior sectionectomy) between 2019 and 2024. Four expert hepatobiliary surgeons (HPB) and four postgraduate surgical trainees (PGY5) independently assessed surgical strategy based on 2D imaging, followed by reevaluation with 3D reconstructions. Patient-specific 3D structures were generated using an AI-assisted segmentation pipeline and systematically revised by physician specialists, a board-certified abdominal radiologist and two hepatobiliary surgeons. Intra-rater concordance was evaluated using Cohen's Kappa. Primary endpoint was the rate and directionality of surgical plan modifications due to 3DVT. Secondary endpoints included perioperative outcomes and segmentation performance metrics. 3DVT prompted significant changes in surgical planning, particularly in assessing LHM feasibility. Trainees exhibited a higher proportion of positive shifts in decision-making (No → Yes: 17.6%) compared to experts (10.8%), whereas experts more frequently reversed previously affirmative decisions (Yes → No: 9.5%). In select raters, negative Kappa values indicated systematic reassessment driven by 3D data. No significant differences in intraoperative blood loss, operative time, transfusion rate, complications, or mortality were observed between AA + LHM and CA cohorts. 3D segmentation achieved high concordance with manual ground truth (median Dice similarity coefficient for liver parenchyma: 0.98). 3DVT exerts a quantifiable influence on preoperative strategy, particularly for complex hepatic resections. It facilitates surgical planning among trainees and enhances precision among experienced surgeons. Integration of 3DVT may support safer adoption of technically demanding maneuvers such as LHM, especially in minimally invasive settings.

大肝切除术前路肝悬挂操作与常规入路:3D可视化技术能影响复杂的手术操作吗?
肝悬挂手法(LHM)的前路入路(AA)已被提出作为常规入路(CA)的替代方案。尽管具有潜在的优势,但LHM仍未得到充分利用,部分原因是担心血管损伤和肿瘤破裂。三维可视化技术(3DVT)可以提高解剖学的理解,并为术前决策选择手术策略提供信息。我们回顾性分析了2019年至2024年间接受大肝切除术(右/左肝切除术和右后切断术)的20例患者。4名专家肝胆外科医生(HPB)和4名研究生外科实习生(PGY5)根据2D成像独立评估手术策略,然后通过3D重建进行重新评估。使用人工智能辅助分割管道生成患者特定的3D结构,并由内科专家、一名委员会认证的腹部放射科医生和两名肝胆外科医生进行系统修改。采用Cohen’s Kappa评价评分内一致性。主要终点是3DVT手术方案修改的率和方向性。次要终点包括围手术期结果和分割性能指标。3DVT促使手术计划发生重大变化,特别是在评估LHM可行性方面。与专家(10.8%)相比,受训者在决策方面表现出更高的积极转变比例(否→是:17.6%),而专家更频繁地改变先前的肯定决策(是→否:9.5%)。在选择评分者中,负Kappa值表示由3D数据驱动的系统重新评估。AA + LHM组和CA组在术中出血量、手术时间、输血率、并发症或死亡率方面无显著差异。三维分割与人工ground truth的一致性较高(肝实质的Dice相似系数中值为0.98)。3DVT对术前策略有可量化的影响,特别是对于复杂的肝切除术。它促进了受训者的手术计划,提高了经验丰富的外科医生的精确度。3DVT的集成可以支持更安全的采用技术要求高的操作,如LHM,特别是在微创环境中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Updates in Surgery
Updates in Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: Updates in Surgery (UPIS) has been founded in 2010 as the official journal of the Italian Society of Surgery. It’s an international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to the surgical sciences. Its main goal is to offer a valuable update on the most recent developments of those surgical techniques that are rapidly evolving, forcing the community of surgeons to a rigorous debate and a continuous refinement of standards of care. In this respect position papers on the mostly debated surgical approaches and accreditation criteria have been published and are welcome for the future. Beside its focus on general surgery, the journal draws particular attention to cutting edge topics and emerging surgical fields that are publishing in monothematic issues guest edited by well-known experts. Updates in Surgery has been considering various types of papers: editorials, comprehensive reviews, original studies and technical notes related to specific surgical procedures and techniques on liver, colorectal, gastric, pancreatic, robotic and bariatric surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书