Emile H Kotze, Elmar C Van Eeden, Shannon-Lee Rietkerk, Kelefile Moloantoa, Mpumelelo Ndaba, Roux Burger, Cornel Van Rooyen, Johan Botes, Chantelle C Van der Bijl
{"title":"Admitted patients' recall of their treating doctors' names in adult wards of a South African district hospital.","authors":"Emile H Kotze, Elmar C Van Eeden, Shannon-Lee Rietkerk, Kelefile Moloantoa, Mpumelelo Ndaba, Roux Burger, Cornel Van Rooyen, Johan Botes, Chantelle C Van der Bijl","doi":"10.4102/safp.v68i1.6257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Best practice guidelines suggest that patients should be well acquainted with their healthcare provider, and that doctors should introduce themselves or be introduced by another member of the patient's healthcare team. This aligns with the National Patients' Rights Charter by the National Department of Health, which states that every patient has the right to be treated by a named healthcare provider. Nevertheless, many patients have trouble recalling the name of their doctor. This study aimed to determine whether patients admitted to the adult ward of the National District Hospital in the Free State province, South Africa, could recall their doctor's name.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Structured interviews were conducted with consenting patients to evaluate whether they knew their doctors' names.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 10% of patients recalled their doctor's name. Less than half reported that doctors introduced themselves, 41% noticed a name badge, 63% saw their doctor more than once daily and 86% understood the reason for admission. The education levels of the patients showed no discernible influence on the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A minority of patients could recall their doctors' names, indicating a potential gap in communication and connection. Many patients expressed uncertainty regarding their doctor's name. This study underscores the importance of improving the visibility, accessibility and consistency of doctor identification methods in healthcare settings to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and optimise patient care experiences.Contribution: This study underscores the necessity for institutions to prioritise and implement strategies to enhance patient-doctor recognition, thereby improving therapeutic relationships and potentially improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"68 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13149908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v68i1.6257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Best practice guidelines suggest that patients should be well acquainted with their healthcare provider, and that doctors should introduce themselves or be introduced by another member of the patient's healthcare team. This aligns with the National Patients' Rights Charter by the National Department of Health, which states that every patient has the right to be treated by a named healthcare provider. Nevertheless, many patients have trouble recalling the name of their doctor. This study aimed to determine whether patients admitted to the adult ward of the National District Hospital in the Free State province, South Africa, could recall their doctor's name.
Methods: Structured interviews were conducted with consenting patients to evaluate whether they knew their doctors' names.
Results: Only 10% of patients recalled their doctor's name. Less than half reported that doctors introduced themselves, 41% noticed a name badge, 63% saw their doctor more than once daily and 86% understood the reason for admission. The education levels of the patients showed no discernible influence on the results.
Conclusion: A minority of patients could recall their doctors' names, indicating a potential gap in communication and connection. Many patients expressed uncertainty regarding their doctor's name. This study underscores the importance of improving the visibility, accessibility and consistency of doctor identification methods in healthcare settings to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and optimise patient care experiences.Contribution: This study underscores the necessity for institutions to prioritise and implement strategies to enhance patient-doctor recognition, thereby improving therapeutic relationships and potentially improving patient outcomes.
期刊介绍:
South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.