Admitted patients' recall of their treating doctors' names in adult wards of a South African district hospital.

IF 1.2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Emile H Kotze, Elmar C Van Eeden, Shannon-Lee Rietkerk, Kelefile Moloantoa, Mpumelelo Ndaba, Roux Burger, Cornel Van Rooyen, Johan Botes, Chantelle C Van der Bijl
{"title":"Admitted patients' recall of their treating doctors' names in adult wards of a South African district hospital.","authors":"Emile H Kotze, Elmar C Van Eeden, Shannon-Lee Rietkerk, Kelefile Moloantoa, Mpumelelo Ndaba, Roux Burger, Cornel Van Rooyen, Johan Botes, Chantelle C Van der Bijl","doi":"10.4102/safp.v68i1.6257","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Best practice guidelines suggest that patients should be well acquainted with their healthcare provider, and that doctors should introduce themselves or be introduced by another member of the patient's healthcare team. This aligns with the National Patients' Rights Charter by the National Department of Health, which states that every patient has the right to be treated by a named healthcare provider. Nevertheless, many patients have trouble recalling the name of their doctor. This study aimed to determine whether patients admitted to the adult ward of the National District Hospital in the Free State province, South Africa, could recall their doctor's name.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Structured interviews were conducted with consenting patients to evaluate whether they knew their doctors' names.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Only 10% of patients recalled their doctor's name. Less than half reported that doctors introduced themselves, 41% noticed a name badge, 63% saw their doctor more than once daily and 86% understood the reason for admission. The education levels of the patients showed no discernible influence on the results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A minority of patients could recall their doctors' names, indicating a potential gap in communication and connection. Many patients expressed uncertainty regarding their doctor's name. This study underscores the importance of improving the visibility, accessibility and consistency of doctor identification methods in healthcare settings to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and optimise patient care experiences.Contribution: This study underscores the necessity for institutions to prioritise and implement strategies to enhance patient-doctor recognition, thereby improving therapeutic relationships and potentially improving patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":22040,"journal":{"name":"South African Family Practice","volume":"68 1","pages":"e1-e7"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13149908/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Family Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4102/safp.v68i1.6257","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Best practice guidelines suggest that patients should be well acquainted with their healthcare provider, and that doctors should introduce themselves or be introduced by another member of the patient's healthcare team. This aligns with the National Patients' Rights Charter by the National Department of Health, which states that every patient has the right to be treated by a named healthcare provider. Nevertheless, many patients have trouble recalling the name of their doctor. This study aimed to determine whether patients admitted to the adult ward of the National District Hospital in the Free State province, South Africa, could recall their doctor's name.

Methods: Structured interviews were conducted with consenting patients to evaluate whether they knew their doctors' names.

Results: Only 10% of patients recalled their doctor's name. Less than half reported that doctors introduced themselves, 41% noticed a name badge, 63% saw their doctor more than once daily and 86% understood the reason for admission. The education levels of the patients showed no discernible influence on the results.

Conclusion: A minority of patients could recall their doctors' names, indicating a potential gap in communication and connection. Many patients expressed uncertainty regarding their doctor's name. This study underscores the importance of improving the visibility, accessibility and consistency of doctor identification methods in healthcare settings to strengthen the doctor-patient relationship and optimise patient care experiences.Contribution: This study underscores the necessity for institutions to prioritise and implement strategies to enhance patient-doctor recognition, thereby improving therapeutic relationships and potentially improving patient outcomes.

在南非一家地区医院的成人病房,入院的病人回忆起他们的主治医生的名字。
背景:最佳实践指南建议患者应该非常熟悉他们的医疗保健提供者,医生应该自我介绍或由患者医疗保健团队的其他成员介绍。这与国家卫生部的《国家病人权利宪章》相一致,该宪章规定,每个病人都有权得到指定的医疗保健提供者的治疗。然而,很多病人都记不起医生的名字。这项研究旨在确定南非自由邦省国立地区医院成人病房的病人是否能回忆起他们医生的名字。方法:对患者进行结构化访谈,以评估他们是否知道医生的名字。结果:只有10%的病人记得医生的名字。不到一半的人报告说医生会自我介绍,41%的人注意到名牌,63%的人每天看医生不止一次,86%的人知道入院的原因。患者的教育程度对结果没有明显的影响。结论:少数患者能够回忆起医生的名字,这表明在沟通和联系方面存在潜在的差距。许多病人对医生的名字表示不确定。本研究强调了在医疗环境中提高医生识别方法的可见性、可及性和一致性的重要性,以加强医患关系并优化患者护理体验。贡献:本研究强调了机构优先考虑和实施提高医患认知的策略的必要性,从而改善治疗关系,并可能改善患者的预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
South African Family Practice
South African Family Practice MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
79
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: South African Family Practice (SAFP) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal, which strives to provide primary care physicians and researchers with a broad range of scholarly work in the disciplines of Family Medicine, Primary Health Care, Rural Medicine, District Health and other related fields. SAFP publishes original research, clinical reviews, and pertinent commentary that advance the knowledge base of these disciplines. The content of SAFP is designed to reflect and support further development of the broad basis of these disciplines through original research and critical review of evidence in important clinical areas; as well as to provide practitioners with continuing professional development material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书