Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Oncology Letters Pub Date : 2026-04-27 eCollection Date: 2026-06-01 DOI:10.3892/ol.2026.15619
Yuhao Su, Yuxin Liang, Deyuan Zhong, Hongtao Yan, Qinyan Yang, Xiaolun Huang
{"title":"Neoadjuvant radiotherapy for resectable hepatocellular carcinoma with vascular invasion: A systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yuhao Su, Yuxin Liang, Deyuan Zhong, Hongtao Yan, Qinyan Yang, Xiaolun Huang","doi":"10.3892/ol.2026.15619","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Advances in conformal and image-guided external-beam radiotherapy have expanded its application in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before resection for HCC with vascular invasion remains uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus hepatectomy vs. hepatectomy alone in resectable HCC with vascular invasion. Databases were searched through August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of four studies (n=362) were included. In the overall pooled analysis, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in 1-year OS [risk ratio (RR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-3.69] or 2-year OS (RR 2.64; 95% CI 0.57-12.27), with considerable heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> 97 and 94%, respectively). Similarly, 1-year DFS was not significantly different between groups (RR 2.68; 95% CI 0.50-14.43; I<sup>2</sup> 95%). In subgroup analyses by vascular invasion type, patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) showed a higher 1-year and 2-year OS compared with surgery alone, and two studies reporting time-to-event outcomes suggested lower recurrence and mortality; however, these findings are based on a small number of studies and should be interpreted with caution. Reported radiotherapy-related toxicities were generally manageable. Overall, current evidence is limited and heterogeneous; neoadjuvant radiotherapy may benefit selected patients with resectable HCC and PVTT, but adequately powered multicenter randomized trials with standardized protocols are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":19503,"journal":{"name":"Oncology Letters","volume":"31 6","pages":"264"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13145327/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oncology Letters","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2026.15619","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Advances in conformal and image-guided external-beam radiotherapy have expanded its application in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); however, the benefit of neoadjuvant radiotherapy before resection for HCC with vascular invasion remains uncertain. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted comparing neoadjuvant radiotherapy plus hepatectomy vs. hepatectomy alone in resectable HCC with vascular invasion. Databases were searched through August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). A total of four studies (n=362) were included. In the overall pooled analysis, neoadjuvant radiotherapy was not associated with a statistically significant improvement in 1-year OS [risk ratio (RR) 1.62; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-3.69] or 2-year OS (RR 2.64; 95% CI 0.57-12.27), with considerable heterogeneity (I2 97 and 94%, respectively). Similarly, 1-year DFS was not significantly different between groups (RR 2.68; 95% CI 0.50-14.43; I2 95%). In subgroup analyses by vascular invasion type, patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) showed a higher 1-year and 2-year OS compared with surgery alone, and two studies reporting time-to-event outcomes suggested lower recurrence and mortality; however, these findings are based on a small number of studies and should be interpreted with caution. Reported radiotherapy-related toxicities were generally manageable. Overall, current evidence is limited and heterogeneous; neoadjuvant radiotherapy may benefit selected patients with resectable HCC and PVTT, but adequately powered multicenter randomized trials with standardized protocols are needed.

可切除肝细胞癌伴血管侵犯的新辅助放疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
适形和图像引导外束放射治疗的进展扩大了其在肝细胞癌(HCC)中的应用;然而,对于有血管侵犯的肝细胞癌,术前新辅助放疗的益处仍不确定。系统回顾和荟萃分析比较了新辅助放疗加肝切除术与单独肝切除术治疗可切除的肝细胞癌伴血管侵犯。数据库被搜索到2024年8月1日。主要结局是总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)。共纳入4项研究(n=362)。在总体汇总分析中,新辅助放疗与1年OS改善无统计学意义[风险比(RR) 1.62;95%可信区间(CI) 0.71-3.69]或2年OS (RR 2.64; 95% CI 0.57-12.27),具有相当大的异质性(分别为i297和94%)。同样,各组间1年DFS无显著差异(RR 2.68; 95% CI 0.50-14.43; I2 95%)。在按血管侵犯类型进行的亚组分析中,门静脉肿瘤血栓(PVTT)患者的1年和2年OS比单纯手术患者高,两项报告事件发生时间结局的研究表明复发率和死亡率较低;然而,这些发现是基于少量的研究,应该谨慎解释。报告的放射治疗相关的毒性通常是可控的。总的来说,目前的证据是有限的和异构的;新辅助放疗可能使可切除的HCC和PVTT患者受益,但需要有足够的多中心随机试验和标准化方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Oncology Letters
Oncology Letters ONCOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
412
审稿时长
2.0 months
期刊介绍: Oncology Letters is a monthly, peer-reviewed journal, available in print and online, that focuses on all aspects of clinical oncology, as well as in vitro and in vivo experimental model systems relevant to the mechanisms of disease. The principal aim of Oncology Letters is to provide the prompt publication of original studies of high quality that pertain to clinical oncology, chemotherapy, oncogenes, carcinogenesis, metastasis, epidemiology and viral oncology in the form of original research, reviews and case reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书