Utilization of the Stop-Short Technique in Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Is Associated with Intraoperative Common Carotid Artery Dissection.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Y H Andrew Wu, Roberto G Aru, Solomon Mulugeta, Morgan Colling, Chen Dun, Midori P White, Jamie Schwartz, Andres Carvajal, Christopher J Abularrage, Michael C Stoner, Jesse A Columbo, Sumaira Macdonald, Caitlin W Hicks
{"title":"Utilization of the Stop-Short Technique in Transcarotid Artery Revascularization Is Associated with Intraoperative Common Carotid Artery Dissection.","authors":"Y H Andrew Wu, Roberto G Aru, Solomon Mulugeta, Morgan Colling, Chen Dun, Midori P White, Jamie Schwartz, Andres Carvajal, Christopher J Abularrage, Michael C Stoner, Jesse A Columbo, Sumaira Macdonald, Caitlin W Hicks","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has gained widespread adoption for carotid stenosis since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it for use in 2015. Intraoperative common carotid artery (CCA) dissection during the procedure remains a feared complication. However, data describing CCA dissection incidence and ways to mitigate it remain limited. We analyzed a contemporary, manufacturer-maintained registry to determine the incidence, risk factors, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of CCA dissection during TCAR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the Silk Road Medical (Sunnyvale, CA) registry, which included all TCAR procedures performed between January 2023 and January 2024. We identified cases of CCA dissection, recorded the procedural step during which they occurred, and reviewed management strategies and perioperative acute stroke events. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with CCA dissection and compared procedural metrics between patients with vs. without CCA dissection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 25,346 patients undergoing TCAR (median age of 74 years, 61.9 % male), 300 (1.18%) experienced a CCA dissection. CCA dissections occurred most commonly during arterial sheath insertion (61.7%), followed by micropuncture access (21.7%), and guidewire manipulation (12.0%). Surgeons managed dissections with additional stent deployment (41.0%), carotid endarterectomy conversion (22.0%) or other open surgical repairs (6.7%). Acute stroke events occurred in 2.3% of patients with CCA dissection (7/300). After risk adjustment, factors associated with CCA dissection included age ≥85 years (vs <65 years; aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17-3.02), female sex (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), and use of the stop-short technique (i.e maintaining the stiff guidewire within the CCA during sheath insertion instead of advancing to the external carotid artery [aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.70-3.02]). Patients with CCA dissection had longer procedure times, greater fluoroscopy exposure, higher contrast use, and more frequent use of ≥2 stents (all P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Nearly a decade after its FDA approval, TCAR continues to demonstrate a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of intraoperative CCA dissection. Use of the stop-short technique was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of CCA dissection. Surgeons should engage the external carotid artery during sheath insertion whenever possible to minimize the risk of CCA dissection.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.023","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) has gained widespread adoption for carotid stenosis since the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved it for use in 2015. Intraoperative common carotid artery (CCA) dissection during the procedure remains a feared complication. However, data describing CCA dissection incidence and ways to mitigate it remain limited. We analyzed a contemporary, manufacturer-maintained registry to determine the incidence, risk factors, management strategies, and clinical outcomes of CCA dissection during TCAR.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the Silk Road Medical (Sunnyvale, CA) registry, which included all TCAR procedures performed between January 2023 and January 2024. We identified cases of CCA dissection, recorded the procedural step during which they occurred, and reviewed management strategies and perioperative acute stroke events. We used multivariable logistic regression to identify patient and procedural characteristics associated with CCA dissection and compared procedural metrics between patients with vs. without CCA dissection.

Results: Of 25,346 patients undergoing TCAR (median age of 74 years, 61.9 % male), 300 (1.18%) experienced a CCA dissection. CCA dissections occurred most commonly during arterial sheath insertion (61.7%), followed by micropuncture access (21.7%), and guidewire manipulation (12.0%). Surgeons managed dissections with additional stent deployment (41.0%), carotid endarterectomy conversion (22.0%) or other open surgical repairs (6.7%). Acute stroke events occurred in 2.3% of patients with CCA dissection (7/300). After risk adjustment, factors associated with CCA dissection included age ≥85 years (vs <65 years; aOR, 1.82; 95% CI, 1.17-3.02), female sex (aOR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.31-2.07), and use of the stop-short technique (i.e maintaining the stiff guidewire within the CCA during sheath insertion instead of advancing to the external carotid artery [aOR, 2.25; 95% CI, 1.70-3.02]). Patients with CCA dissection had longer procedure times, greater fluoroscopy exposure, higher contrast use, and more frequent use of ≥2 stents (all P < 0.001).

Conclusion: Nearly a decade after its FDA approval, TCAR continues to demonstrate a favorable safety profile, with a low incidence of intraoperative CCA dissection. Use of the stop-short technique was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of CCA dissection. Surgeons should engage the external carotid artery during sheath insertion whenever possible to minimize the risk of CCA dissection.

经颈动脉血运重建术与术中颈总动脉夹层的应用
背景:自2015年美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准使用经颈动脉重建术(TCAR)以来,经颈动脉重建术(TCAR)已被广泛应用于颈动脉狭窄。术中颈总动脉(CCA)剥离仍然是一个可怕的并发症。然而,描述CCA夹层发生率和缓解方法的数据仍然有限。我们分析了当代制造商维护的注册表,以确定TCAR期间CCA剥离的发生率、风险因素、管理策略和临床结果。方法:我们回顾性分析了丝绸之路医疗(Sunnyvale, CA)注册中心,其中包括2023年1月至2024年1月期间进行的所有TCAR手术。我们确定了CCA剥离的病例,记录了它们发生的程序步骤,并回顾了处理策略和围手术期急性卒中事件。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定与CCA剥离相关的患者和程序特征,并比较CCA剥离患者与非CCA剥离患者之间的程序指标。结果:25346例接受TCAR的患者(中位年龄74岁,61.9%为男性)中,300例(1.18%)经历了CCA夹层。CCA夹层最常见于动脉鞘插入(61.7%),其次是微穿刺(21.7%)和导丝操作(12.0%)。外科医生通过额外支架置入(41.0%)、颈动脉内膜切除术转换(22.0%)或其他开放手术修复(6.7%)来处理夹层。急性脑卒中发生率为2.3%(7/300)。经过风险调整后,与CCA剥离相关的因素包括年龄≥85岁(vs结论:在FDA批准近十年后,TCAR继续显示出良好的安全性,术中CCA剥离的发生率较低。使用短停技术与CCA剥离风险增加两倍相关。在鞘插入过程中,外科医生应尽可能地介入颈外动脉,以尽量减少CCA剥离的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书