Non-Syndromic Familial Type B Aortic Dissection Exhibits Distinct Clinical Profiles and Operative Outcomes.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Tiffany Lian, Chih-Wen Pai, Elise Woznicki, Maral Ouzounian, Eduardo Bossone, Kevin M Harris, Patrick O'Gara, Jean Bismuth, Anil Bhan, Clayton Kaiser, Edward P Chen, Christoph Nienaber, Eric Isselbacher, Mark Lindsay, Kim Eagle, Arturo Evangelista, Sherene Shalhub
{"title":"Non-Syndromic Familial Type B Aortic Dissection Exhibits Distinct Clinical Profiles and Operative Outcomes.","authors":"Tiffany Lian, Chih-Wen Pai, Elise Woznicki, Maral Ouzounian, Eduardo Bossone, Kevin M Harris, Patrick O'Gara, Jean Bismuth, Anil Bhan, Clayton Kaiser, Edward P Chen, Christoph Nienaber, Eric Isselbacher, Mark Lindsay, Kim Eagle, Arturo Evangelista, Sherene Shalhub","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>While a heritable nature of type A aortic dissection is well established, the contribution of family history to type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains less clearly characterized. This analysis evaluates the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of familial TBAD (FTBAD) compared to sporadic TBAD and Marfan syndrome (MFS)-related TBAD to determine whether familial TBAD exhibits features consistent with increased underlying aortic vulnerability.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of TBAD patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between 1996 and 2024. Based on standardized clinical abstraction, patients were categorized as familial TBAD (FTBAD), sporadic TBAD, or MFS-associated TBAD. Baseline characteristics, imaging features, surgical management, in-hospital outcomes, and post-discharge events across groups using bivariate and time-to-event analyses for up to 4-years post discharge were compared. Time-to-event analysis included re-intervention, rupture, and survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2,726 patients (mean age 63.0±14.6 years; 64.2% male), 223 (8.2%) had FTBAD and 128 (4.7%) had MFS. Patients with FTBAD presented at a younger age than those with sporadic TBAD (60.8 vs. 64.3 years, p<.001) but older than patients with MFS (42.4 years). ompared with sporadic TBAD, FTBAD patients were more frequently normotensive at presentation and had higher rates of prior aortic dissection and prior cardiac or aortic surgery.Patent false lumen was more frequent in FTBAD (60.0%) and MFS (66.7%) compared to sporadic TBAD (49.8%) and FTBAD patients had more extensive dissections despite a similar aortic diameter at the time of dissection compared to sporadic TBAD. The indication for endovascular intervention was more frequently visceral ischemia in FTBAD compared to sporadic TBAD (23.5 vs. 10.9%, p<0.05). TEVAR was less frequently performed in FTBAD compared to sporadic TBAD (23.8% vs. 29.7%, p=0.081), and least common in MFS (15.6%). Post-discharge data were available for 56.9% of those discharged. Three-year incidence of late surgical intervention was 23.78% for FTBAD patients, higher than sporadic TBAD (15.7%, p=0.023). One-year survival exceeded 93% in all groups; four-year survival exceeded 83%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-syndromic familial TBAD is present in a meaningful proportion of patients and is associated with distinct clinical features consistent with increased underlying aortic vulnerability compared with sporadic TBAD. Systematic assessment of family history may improve risk stratification, longitudinal surveillance, and patient shared decision-making in the management of TBAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: While a heritable nature of type A aortic dissection is well established, the contribution of family history to type B aortic dissection (TBAD) remains less clearly characterized. This analysis evaluates the prevalence, clinical characteristics, and outcomes of familial TBAD (FTBAD) compared to sporadic TBAD and Marfan syndrome (MFS)-related TBAD to determine whether familial TBAD exhibits features consistent with increased underlying aortic vulnerability.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of TBAD patients enrolled in the International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) between 1996 and 2024. Based on standardized clinical abstraction, patients were categorized as familial TBAD (FTBAD), sporadic TBAD, or MFS-associated TBAD. Baseline characteristics, imaging features, surgical management, in-hospital outcomes, and post-discharge events across groups using bivariate and time-to-event analyses for up to 4-years post discharge were compared. Time-to-event analysis included re-intervention, rupture, and survival.

Results: Among 2,726 patients (mean age 63.0±14.6 years; 64.2% male), 223 (8.2%) had FTBAD and 128 (4.7%) had MFS. Patients with FTBAD presented at a younger age than those with sporadic TBAD (60.8 vs. 64.3 years, p<.001) but older than patients with MFS (42.4 years). ompared with sporadic TBAD, FTBAD patients were more frequently normotensive at presentation and had higher rates of prior aortic dissection and prior cardiac or aortic surgery.Patent false lumen was more frequent in FTBAD (60.0%) and MFS (66.7%) compared to sporadic TBAD (49.8%) and FTBAD patients had more extensive dissections despite a similar aortic diameter at the time of dissection compared to sporadic TBAD. The indication for endovascular intervention was more frequently visceral ischemia in FTBAD compared to sporadic TBAD (23.5 vs. 10.9%, p<0.05). TEVAR was less frequently performed in FTBAD compared to sporadic TBAD (23.8% vs. 29.7%, p=0.081), and least common in MFS (15.6%). Post-discharge data were available for 56.9% of those discharged. Three-year incidence of late surgical intervention was 23.78% for FTBAD patients, higher than sporadic TBAD (15.7%, p=0.023). One-year survival exceeded 93% in all groups; four-year survival exceeded 83%.

Conclusions: Non-syndromic familial TBAD is present in a meaningful proportion of patients and is associated with distinct clinical features consistent with increased underlying aortic vulnerability compared with sporadic TBAD. Systematic assessment of family history may improve risk stratification, longitudinal surveillance, and patient shared decision-making in the management of TBAD.

非综合征性家族性B型主动脉夹层表现出不同的临床特征和手术结果。
背景:虽然a型主动脉夹层的遗传性质已经确定,但家族史对B型主动脉夹层(TBAD)的影响仍然不太清楚。该分析评估了家族性TBAD (FTBAD)的患病率、临床特征和结果,并与散发性TBAD和马范氏综合征(MFS)相关的TBAD进行了比较,以确定家族性TBAD是否表现出与潜在主动脉易损性增加相一致的特征。方法:回顾性分析1996年至2024年间在国际急性主动脉夹层登记处(IRAD)登记的TBAD患者。基于标准化的临床抽诊,将患者分为家族性TBAD (FTBAD)、散发性TBAD和mfs相关性TBAD。使用双变量分析和事件时间分析,比较各组的基线特征、影像学特征、手术处理、住院结果和出院后事件,最长时间为出院后4年。事件发生时间分析包括再干预、破裂和存活。结果:2726例患者(平均年龄63.0±14.6岁,男性64.2%)中,223例(8.2%)有FTBAD, 128例(4.7%)有MFS。结论:与散发性TBAD相比,非综合征性家族性TBAD存在于相当比例的患者中,并且与明显的临床特征相关,与潜在的主动脉易损性增加相一致。家族史的系统评估可以改善TBAD管理的风险分层、纵向监测和患者共同决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书