The Impact of Frailty on Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance and Postoperative Outcomes After Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Lara Lopes, Calvin L Chao, Nicola Habash, Deena El-Gabri, Margaret Reilly, Veronica M Boratyn, Gabrielle Osher, Ashley K Vavra
{"title":"The Impact of Frailty on Enhanced Recovery Protocol Compliance and Postoperative Outcomes After Infrainguinal Arterial Bypass.","authors":"Lara Lopes, Calvin L Chao, Nicola Habash, Deena El-Gabri, Margaret Reilly, Veronica M Boratyn, Gabrielle Osher, Ashley K Vavra","doi":"10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of frailty on enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) compliance and the impact of ERP on adverse postoperative outcomes in frail patients undergoing infra-inguinal arterial bypass (IB).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective single-institution study of patients undergoing IB (2021-2024). Patients were categorized into three frailty groups using the NSQIP 5-item frailty index where F1=less frail (F1=0-1 risk factor; F2=2 risk factors; F3=3-5 risk factors). The association between frailty and both ERP compliance and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables while continuous variables were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in the elective intervention cohort, with follow-up truncated at 30 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>257 patients were identified and stratified by frailty (F1=32.7%; F2=36.6%; F3=30.7%). F1 patients were significantly younger (mean age in years F1=65.0; F2=71.6; F3=71.6; p <0.001) and less likely to present with tissue loss (F1=31.0%; F2=47.9%; F3=62.0%; p<0.001). ERP compliance was not associated with frailty (F1=57.1%; F2=54.8%; F3=61.5%; p=0.739). Overall, patients who underwent ERP had a significantly shorter median postoperative LOS compared to non-ERP patients (4.8 vs. 7.0 days, p<0.001). Within the F3 cohort, ERP compliance was associated with lower reintervention rate (ERP=15.0% vs. non-ERP=33.3%; p=0.050); lower postoperative length of stay (ERP=7.9 days vs. non-ERP=9.8 days, p=0.016); and a reduction in 30-day mortality (ERP=2.5% vs. non-ERP=7.7%; p=0.298). In time-to-event analysis of elective procedures, no differences were observed in the 30-day freedom from reintervention, readmission or mortality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High frailty was not a barrier to the implementation of ERP and ERP was associated with improved postoperative outcomes in highly frail patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2026.04.026","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of frailty on enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) compliance and the impact of ERP on adverse postoperative outcomes in frail patients undergoing infra-inguinal arterial bypass (IB).

Methods: We performed a retrospective single-institution study of patients undergoing IB (2021-2024). Patients were categorized into three frailty groups using the NSQIP 5-item frailty index where F1=less frail (F1=0-1 risk factor; F2=2 risk factors; F3=3-5 risk factors). The association between frailty and both ERP compliance and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used for categorical variables while continuous variables were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis test. Time-to-event outcomes were assessed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis in the elective intervention cohort, with follow-up truncated at 30 days.

Results: 257 patients were identified and stratified by frailty (F1=32.7%; F2=36.6%; F3=30.7%). F1 patients were significantly younger (mean age in years F1=65.0; F2=71.6; F3=71.6; p <0.001) and less likely to present with tissue loss (F1=31.0%; F2=47.9%; F3=62.0%; p<0.001). ERP compliance was not associated with frailty (F1=57.1%; F2=54.8%; F3=61.5%; p=0.739). Overall, patients who underwent ERP had a significantly shorter median postoperative LOS compared to non-ERP patients (4.8 vs. 7.0 days, p<0.001). Within the F3 cohort, ERP compliance was associated with lower reintervention rate (ERP=15.0% vs. non-ERP=33.3%; p=0.050); lower postoperative length of stay (ERP=7.9 days vs. non-ERP=9.8 days, p=0.016); and a reduction in 30-day mortality (ERP=2.5% vs. non-ERP=7.7%; p=0.298). In time-to-event analysis of elective procedures, no differences were observed in the 30-day freedom from reintervention, readmission or mortality.

Conclusion: High frailty was not a barrier to the implementation of ERP and ERP was associated with improved postoperative outcomes in highly frail patients.

虚弱对腹股沟下动脉旁路术后增强恢复方案依从性和术后结果的影响。
目的:本研究的目的是评估虚弱对增强恢复方案(ERP)依从性的影响,以及ERP对腹股沟下动脉旁路(IB)虚弱患者术后不良结局的影响。方法:我们对接受IB治疗的患者(2021-2024)进行了一项回顾性单机构研究。采用NSQIP 5项衰弱指数将患者分为3组,F1=较弱(F1=0-1个危险因素;F2=2个危险因素;F3=3-5个危险因素)。分析虚弱与ERP依从性和术后结果之间的关系。分类变量采用卡方检验和Fisher精确检验,连续变量采用Kruskal-Wallis检验。在选择性干预队列中,使用Kaplan-Meier生存分析评估事件发生时间,随访时间缩短至30天。结果:257例患者被确定并按虚弱程度分层(F1=32.7%; F2=36.6%; F3=30.7%)。F1患者明显年轻化(平均年龄F1=65.0; F2=71.6; F3=71.6; p)结论:高度虚弱不是实施ERP的障碍,在高度虚弱的患者中,ERP与术后预后改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
18.60%
发文量
1469
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Vascular Surgery ® aims to be the premier international journal of medical, endovascular and surgical care of vascular diseases. It is dedicated to the science and art of vascular surgery and aims to improve the management of patients with vascular diseases by publishing relevant papers that report important medical advances, test new hypotheses, and address current controversies. To acheive this goal, the Journal will publish original clinical and laboratory studies, and reports and papers that comment on the social, economic, ethical, legal, and political factors, which relate to these aims. As the official publication of The Society for Vascular Surgery, the Journal will publish, after peer review, selected papers presented at the annual meeting of this organization and affiliated vascular societies, as well as original articles from members and non-members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书