Nicola L de Souza, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Raj G Kumar, Kristen Dams-O'Connor
{"title":"Prospective Assessment of Improvement and Decline in Global Functioning After Traumatic Brain Injury Using Multistate Markov Models.","authors":"Nicola L de Souza, Cynthia L Beaulieu, Raj G Kumar, Kristen Dams-O'Connor","doi":"10.1097/HTR.0000000000001163","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe transitions in global functional status across consecutive follow-up visits, including probabilities for improvement, decline, and stability, and to identify factors associated with transition during the first 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI).</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>TBI Model Systems National Database.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>In total, 13,731 participants with TBI requiring inpatient rehabilitation who completed 2 follow-up assessments within 10 years post-injury, with at least 2 consecutive assessments at 1, 2, 5, or 10 years.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Secondary data analysis.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Global functional status measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, collapsed into 4 states: Good Recovery, Moderate Disability, Severe Disability/Vegetative State, and Death. Transition probabilities were estimated using multistate Markov models, and transition-specific hazard ratios were calculated for covariate effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Probability of remaining in the same state was highest among those with Good Recovery at year 1, with 68.4% (95% CI: 55.1%-80.9%) remaining stable between years 1 and 2. Improvement was common among those initially in Moderate or Severe Disability states. Among participants with Moderate Disability at year 1, 36.6% (95% CI: 18.1%-48.7%) improved and 15.4% (95% CI: 10.1%-18.3%) declined by year 2. Among those with Severe Disability at year 1, 34.5% (95% CI: 22.8%-40.1%) improved to Moderate Disability, and 13.7% (95% CI: 6.7%-21.3%) improved 2 states to Good Recovery. Trends were similar between years 5-10. Risk factors for both decline and mortality included older age at injury. Non-White race, lower education, and public insurance predicted lower likelihood for improvement and greater likelihood of decline. Protective factors included female sex, higher education, private insurance, higher functioning at hospital discharge, and residing in states offering better long-term services and supports.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Recovery after TBI is dynamic, with higher probabilities of functional stability and improvement than decline over 10 years post-injury. Findings highlight modifiable factors with policy-level implications that may influence recovery trajectories.</p>","PeriodicalId":15901,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HTR.0000000000001163","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To describe transitions in global functional status across consecutive follow-up visits, including probabilities for improvement, decline, and stability, and to identify factors associated with transition during the first 10 years after traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Setting: TBI Model Systems National Database.
Participants: In total, 13,731 participants with TBI requiring inpatient rehabilitation who completed 2 follow-up assessments within 10 years post-injury, with at least 2 consecutive assessments at 1, 2, 5, or 10 years.
Design: Secondary data analysis.
Main measures: Global functional status measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, collapsed into 4 states: Good Recovery, Moderate Disability, Severe Disability/Vegetative State, and Death. Transition probabilities were estimated using multistate Markov models, and transition-specific hazard ratios were calculated for covariate effects.
Results: Probability of remaining in the same state was highest among those with Good Recovery at year 1, with 68.4% (95% CI: 55.1%-80.9%) remaining stable between years 1 and 2. Improvement was common among those initially in Moderate or Severe Disability states. Among participants with Moderate Disability at year 1, 36.6% (95% CI: 18.1%-48.7%) improved and 15.4% (95% CI: 10.1%-18.3%) declined by year 2. Among those with Severe Disability at year 1, 34.5% (95% CI: 22.8%-40.1%) improved to Moderate Disability, and 13.7% (95% CI: 6.7%-21.3%) improved 2 states to Good Recovery. Trends were similar between years 5-10. Risk factors for both decline and mortality included older age at injury. Non-White race, lower education, and public insurance predicted lower likelihood for improvement and greater likelihood of decline. Protective factors included female sex, higher education, private insurance, higher functioning at hospital discharge, and residing in states offering better long-term services and supports.
Conclusion: Recovery after TBI is dynamic, with higher probabilities of functional stability and improvement than decline over 10 years post-injury. Findings highlight modifiable factors with policy-level implications that may influence recovery trajectories.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation is a leading, peer-reviewed resource that provides up-to-date information on the clinical management and rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injuries. Six issues each year aspire to the vision of “knowledge informing care” and include a wide range of articles, topical issues, commentaries and special features. It is the official journal of the Brain Injury Association of America (BIAA).