Diabetes Technology Across the Lifespan of People With Diabetes (Ages 2-88 Years): Insights From the dt-Report on Usage Trends Across all Age Groups.

IF 3.7 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Norbert Hermanns, Dominic Ehrmann, Lutz Heinemann, Timm Roos, Bernhard Kulzer, Michael Resl, Julia K Mader, Derek Brandt, Cordelia Truempy, Lisa Margret Koch, Maria Luisa Balmer, Francesco Javier Ampudia-Blasco, Peter Diem
{"title":"Diabetes Technology Across the Lifespan of People With Diabetes (Ages 2-88 Years): Insights From the dt-Report on Usage Trends Across all Age Groups.","authors":"Norbert Hermanns, Dominic Ehrmann, Lutz Heinemann, Timm Roos, Bernhard Kulzer, Michael Resl, Julia K Mader, Derek Brandt, Cordelia Truempy, Lisa Margret Koch, Maria Luisa Balmer, Francesco Javier Ampudia-Blasco, Peter Diem","doi":"10.1177/19322968261444045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The number of adults with diabetes and older age is increasing, yet little is known about age-related differences in real-world diabetes technology use. This analysis examines how uptake, clinical outcomes, and user experience vary across age groups in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-reported data from 2056 individuals with diabetes in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland who completed the diabetes technology report 2024/2025 survey were analyzed. Age-related trends in the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), and automated insulin delivery (AID) were assessed using generalized additive and segmented logistic regression models. Outcomes included HbA1c, diabetes distress (PAID-5), severe hypoglycemia (SH), and, among AID users, satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among people with type 1 diabetes, CGM usage was consistently high across age groups (eg, 94% in 20-29 years; 92% in ≥70 years). Automated insulin delivery usage peaked in adolescents (81% in 10-19 years) and declined to 36% in adults ≥70 years. In type 2 diabetes, CGM use increased with age (48% in 35-44 years; 72% in ≥70 years). The HbA1c remained stable over the age span (±0.25%). Diabetes distress declined with age (Problems Areas in Diabetes Ouestionnaire - 5 Items (PAID-5): 7.8 in <30 vs 4.2 in ≥70 years). The risk of SH did not increase with age; among CSII users, older participants had lower odds of SH (OR 0.03, <i>p</i> = .001). Automated insulin delivery satisfaction was highest in adults aged 60 to 69 years (88.7/100) and lowest in adolescents (79.1/100).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Diabetes technologies are widely used and well tolerated across age groups. Older adults benefit comparably, but barriers to AID use remain.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968261444045"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261444045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The number of adults with diabetes and older age is increasing, yet little is known about age-related differences in real-world diabetes technology use. This analysis examines how uptake, clinical outcomes, and user experience vary across age groups in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes.

Methods: Self-reported data from 2056 individuals with diabetes in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland who completed the diabetes technology report 2024/2025 survey were analyzed. Age-related trends in the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM), continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII), and automated insulin delivery (AID) were assessed using generalized additive and segmented logistic regression models. Outcomes included HbA1c, diabetes distress (PAID-5), severe hypoglycemia (SH), and, among AID users, satisfaction.

Results: Among people with type 1 diabetes, CGM usage was consistently high across age groups (eg, 94% in 20-29 years; 92% in ≥70 years). Automated insulin delivery usage peaked in adolescents (81% in 10-19 years) and declined to 36% in adults ≥70 years. In type 2 diabetes, CGM use increased with age (48% in 35-44 years; 72% in ≥70 years). The HbA1c remained stable over the age span (±0.25%). Diabetes distress declined with age (Problems Areas in Diabetes Ouestionnaire - 5 Items (PAID-5): 7.8 in <30 vs 4.2 in ≥70 years). The risk of SH did not increase with age; among CSII users, older participants had lower odds of SH (OR 0.03, p = .001). Automated insulin delivery satisfaction was highest in adults aged 60 to 69 years (88.7/100) and lowest in adolescents (79.1/100).

Conclusions: Diabetes technologies are widely used and well tolerated across age groups. Older adults benefit comparably, but barriers to AID use remain.

糖尿病技术贯穿糖尿病患者的整个生命周期(2-88岁):来自所有年龄组使用趋势的dt报告的见解。
背景:成人糖尿病患者和老年人的数量正在增加,但对现实世界糖尿病技术使用中与年龄相关的差异知之甚少。该分析考察了不同年龄组1型或2型糖尿病患者的摄取、临床结果和用户体验的差异。方法:对完成糖尿病技术报告2024/2025调查的2056名德国、奥地利和瑞士糖尿病患者的自我报告数据进行分析。使用广义加性和分段逻辑回归模型评估持续血糖监测(CGM)、持续皮下胰岛素输注(CSII)和自动胰岛素输送(AID)的年龄相关趋势。结果包括糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)、糖尿病窘迫(PAID-5)、严重低血糖(SH),以及AID使用者的满意度。结果:在1型糖尿病患者中,CGM的使用在各年龄组中一直很高(例如,20-29岁为94%;≥70岁为92%)。自动胰岛素递送使用在青少年中达到高峰(10-19岁为81%),在≥70岁的成年人中下降到36%。在2型糖尿病患者中,CGM的使用随着年龄的增长而增加(35-44岁为48%,≥70岁为72%)。HbA1c在整个年龄段保持稳定(±0.25%)。糖尿病焦虑随着年龄的增长而下降(糖尿病问卷问题领域-5项(PAID-5): 7.8, p = 0.001)。自动胰岛素输送满意度在60 - 69岁的成年人中最高(88.7/100),在青少年中最低(79.1/100)。结论:糖尿病技术在各年龄组广泛使用且耐受性良好。老年人受益相对较好,但使用艾滋病的障碍仍然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书