Using Stakeholder Input to Develop a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) to Increase Prescribing of Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Systems for People With Type 1 Diabetes (PwT1D).

IF 3.7 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Emma Ospelt, Trevon Wright, Justin Indyk, Nicole Rioles, Susan Thapa, Asher Beckwitt, Osagie Ebekozien, Rachel Hopkins, Joseph Erardi, Abha Choudhary, Meenal Gupta, Mary Pat Gallagher, Jeniece Ilkowitz, Georgia Davis, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Risa M Wolf
{"title":"Using Stakeholder Input to Develop a Best Practice Advisory (BPA) to Increase Prescribing of Automated Insulin Delivery (AID) Systems for People With Type 1 Diabetes (PwT1D).","authors":"Emma Ospelt, Trevon Wright, Justin Indyk, Nicole Rioles, Susan Thapa, Asher Beckwitt, Osagie Ebekozien, Rachel Hopkins, Joseph Erardi, Abha Choudhary, Meenal Gupta, Mary Pat Gallagher, Jeniece Ilkowitz, Georgia Davis, Nestoras Mathioudakis, Risa M Wolf","doi":"10.1177/19322968261443333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes technology use is increasing, yet disparities remain in adoption among people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D). The Best Practice Advisories to Reduce Inequities in Technology Use (\"BPA-TECH\") study is a multi-site quality improvement (QI) initiative that seeks to develop, deploy, and evaluate a BPA aimed at standardizing prescribing of diabetes technologies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods study sought feedback from PwT1D, their care partners, and diabetes clinicians through the T1D Exchange QI Collaborative (T1DX-QI) using electronic surveys, interviews, and focus groups to develop and refine the BPA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The T1DX annual survey with general BPA questions was completed by 56 participating centers (38 pediatric and 18 adult), and 31 diabetes care clinicians from eight T1DX-QI centers (five pediatric and three adult) participated in focus groups. An online survey was completed by 101 PwT1D and/or their care partners, followed by structured interviews with nine adult PwT1D and ten care partners. In response to the annual survey, 48% of pediatric and 28% of adult centers thought a BPA would be useful for increasing automated insulin delivery (AID) use. During focus groups, clinicians expressed concerns about workflow integration and alert fatigue. On surveys, most PwT1D and care partner stakeholder groups (96%) said a BPA would help remind diabetes clinicians to discuss technology with patients, and 77% agreed that a BPA could help PwT1D use these technologies, recommending a cadence of every three months.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Successful BPA development and implementation requires addressing clinician concerns about workflow and alert fatigue, while aligning with PwT1D and care partners' expectations for the cadence of conversations on AID systems.</p>","PeriodicalId":15475,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","volume":" ","pages":"19322968261443333"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19322968261443333","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes technology use is increasing, yet disparities remain in adoption among people with type 1 diabetes (PwT1D). The Best Practice Advisories to Reduce Inequities in Technology Use ("BPA-TECH") study is a multi-site quality improvement (QI) initiative that seeks to develop, deploy, and evaluate a BPA aimed at standardizing prescribing of diabetes technologies.

Methods: This mixed-methods study sought feedback from PwT1D, their care partners, and diabetes clinicians through the T1D Exchange QI Collaborative (T1DX-QI) using electronic surveys, interviews, and focus groups to develop and refine the BPA.

Results: The T1DX annual survey with general BPA questions was completed by 56 participating centers (38 pediatric and 18 adult), and 31 diabetes care clinicians from eight T1DX-QI centers (five pediatric and three adult) participated in focus groups. An online survey was completed by 101 PwT1D and/or their care partners, followed by structured interviews with nine adult PwT1D and ten care partners. In response to the annual survey, 48% of pediatric and 28% of adult centers thought a BPA would be useful for increasing automated insulin delivery (AID) use. During focus groups, clinicians expressed concerns about workflow integration and alert fatigue. On surveys, most PwT1D and care partner stakeholder groups (96%) said a BPA would help remind diabetes clinicians to discuss technology with patients, and 77% agreed that a BPA could help PwT1D use these technologies, recommending a cadence of every three months.

Conclusions: Successful BPA development and implementation requires addressing clinician concerns about workflow and alert fatigue, while aligning with PwT1D and care partners' expectations for the cadence of conversations on AID systems.

利用利益相关者的意见制定最佳实践咨询(BPA),以增加1型糖尿病(PwT1D)患者自动胰岛素输送(AID)系统的处方。
背景:糖尿病技术的使用正在增加,但在1型糖尿病(PwT1D)患者中仍然存在差异。减少技术使用不公平的最佳实践建议(“BPA- tech”)研究是一项多站点质量改进(QI)倡议,旨在开发、部署和评估旨在标准化糖尿病技术处方的BPA。方法:这项混合方法研究通过T1D交流QI协作(T1DX-QI),通过电子调查、访谈和焦点小组,从PwT1D、他们的护理伙伴和糖尿病临床医生那里寻求反馈,以开发和完善BPA。结果:56个T1DX- qi中心(38个儿科中心和18个成人中心)完成了T1DX年度调查,包括一般BPA问题,来自8个T1DX- qi中心(5个儿科中心和3个成人中心)的31名糖尿病护理临床医生参与了焦点小组。101名PwT1D和/或他们的护理伙伴完成了一项在线调查,随后对9名成年PwT1D和10名护理伙伴进行了结构化访谈。在对年度调查的回应中,48%的儿科中心和28%的成人中心认为BPA将有助于增加自动胰岛素输送(AID)的使用。在焦点小组中,临床医生表达了对工作流程整合和警惕性疲劳的担忧。在调查中,大多数PwT1D和护理合作伙伴利益相关者团体(96%)表示,BPA有助于提醒糖尿病临床医生与患者讨论技术,77%的人同意BPA可以帮助PwT1D使用这些技术,建议每三个月进行一次。结论:成功的BPA开发和实施需要解决临床医生对工作流程和警报疲劳的关注,同时与PwT1D和护理伙伴对AID系统对话节奏的期望保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology
Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology Medicine-Internal Medicine
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
12.00%
发文量
148
期刊介绍: The Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology (JDST) is a bi-monthly, peer-reviewed scientific journal published by the Diabetes Technology Society. JDST covers scientific and clinical aspects of diabetes technology including glucose monitoring, insulin and metabolic peptide delivery, the artificial pancreas, digital health, precision medicine, social media, cybersecurity, software for modeling, physiologic monitoring, technology for managing obesity, and diagnostic tests of glycation. The journal also covers the development and use of mobile applications and wireless communication, as well as bioengineered tools such as MEMS, new biomaterials, and nanotechnology to develop new sensors. Articles in JDST cover both basic research and clinical applications of technologies being developed to help people with diabetes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书