The turkish version of the well-being in pain questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and evaluation of measurement properties in individuals with chronic low back pain.
Hatice Betigül Meral, Aylin Rezvani, Sena Tolu, Mithat Oğuz Yavuz
{"title":"The turkish version of the well-being in pain questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and evaluation of measurement properties in individuals with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Hatice Betigül Meral, Aylin Rezvani, Sena Tolu, Mithat Oğuz Yavuz","doi":"10.1177/10538127261448974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Well-Being in Pain Questionnaire (WPQ) assesses psychosocial aspects in individuals with chronic pain.ObjectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the WPQ into Turkish (WPQ-Tr) and evaluate its psychometric properties in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).MethodsThe study included 155 participants (105 with CLBP and 50 pain-free controls). Cross-cultural adaptation followed guidelines. Psychometric evaluation assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, known-groups validity, and convergent validity. Structural validity was examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing WPQ-Tr scores between CLBP and pain-free controls. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlations between WPQ-Tr scores and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).ResultsThe WPQ-Tr demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.713). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.972-0.994)<b>.</b> Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in WPQ-Tr scores between individuals with CLBP and pain-free controls (p < 0.01). PCA indicated a unidimensional structure explaining 54.66% of the variance, supported by CFA. Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.902), PCS (ρ = -0.923), CSI (ρ = -0.923), PSQI (ρ = -0.794), RMDQ (ρ = -0.893), and GAD-7 (ρ = -0.828) (all p < 0.01).ConclusionThe WPQ-Tr is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing well-being in Turkish-speaking individuals with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261448974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261448974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundThe Well-Being in Pain Questionnaire (WPQ) assesses psychosocial aspects in individuals with chronic pain.ObjectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the WPQ into Turkish (WPQ-Tr) and evaluate its psychometric properties in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).MethodsThe study included 155 participants (105 with CLBP and 50 pain-free controls). Cross-cultural adaptation followed guidelines. Psychometric evaluation assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, known-groups validity, and convergent validity. Structural validity was examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing WPQ-Tr scores between CLBP and pain-free controls. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlations between WPQ-Tr scores and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).ResultsThe WPQ-Tr demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.713). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.972-0.994). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in WPQ-Tr scores between individuals with CLBP and pain-free controls (p < 0.01). PCA indicated a unidimensional structure explaining 54.66% of the variance, supported by CFA. Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.902), PCS (ρ = -0.923), CSI (ρ = -0.923), PSQI (ρ = -0.794), RMDQ (ρ = -0.893), and GAD-7 (ρ = -0.828) (all p < 0.01).ConclusionThe WPQ-Tr is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing well-being in Turkish-speaking individuals with CLBP.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty.
In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.