The turkish version of the well-being in pain questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and evaluation of measurement properties in individuals with chronic low back pain.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Hatice Betigül Meral, Aylin Rezvani, Sena Tolu, Mithat Oğuz Yavuz
{"title":"The turkish version of the well-being in pain questionnaire: Cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and evaluation of measurement properties in individuals with chronic low back pain.","authors":"Hatice Betigül Meral, Aylin Rezvani, Sena Tolu, Mithat Oğuz Yavuz","doi":"10.1177/10538127261448974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundThe Well-Being in Pain Questionnaire (WPQ) assesses psychosocial aspects in individuals with chronic pain.ObjectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the WPQ into Turkish (WPQ-Tr) and evaluate its psychometric properties in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).MethodsThe study included 155 participants (105 with CLBP and 50 pain-free controls). Cross-cultural adaptation followed guidelines. Psychometric evaluation assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, known-groups validity, and convergent validity. Structural validity was examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing WPQ-Tr scores between CLBP and pain-free controls. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlations between WPQ-Tr scores and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).ResultsThe WPQ-Tr demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.713). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.972-0.994)<b>.</b> Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in WPQ-Tr scores between individuals with CLBP and pain-free controls (p < 0.01). PCA indicated a unidimensional structure explaining 54.66% of the variance, supported by CFA. Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.902), PCS (ρ = -0.923), CSI (ρ = -0.923), PSQI (ρ = -0.794), RMDQ (ρ = -0.893), and GAD-7 (ρ = -0.828) (all p < 0.01).ConclusionThe WPQ-Tr is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing well-being in Turkish-speaking individuals with CLBP.</p>","PeriodicalId":15129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":"10538127261448974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10538127261448974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundThe Well-Being in Pain Questionnaire (WPQ) assesses psychosocial aspects in individuals with chronic pain.ObjectiveTo translate and culturally adapt the WPQ into Turkish (WPQ-Tr) and evaluate its psychometric properties in individuals with chronic low back pain (CLBP).MethodsThe study included 155 participants (105 with CLBP and 50 pain-free controls). Cross-cultural adaptation followed guidelines. Psychometric evaluation assessed internal consistency, test-retest reliability, structural validity, known-groups validity, and convergent validity. Structural validity was examined using principal component analysis (PCA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Known-groups validity was assessed by comparing WPQ-Tr scores between CLBP and pain-free controls. Convergent validity was evaluated by correlations between WPQ-Tr scores and the EuroQol 5-Dimension 5-Level Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Central Sensitization Inventory (CSI), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7).ResultsThe WPQ-Tr demonstrated acceptable internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.713). Test-retest reliability was excellent, with an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.987 (95% CI: 0.972-0.994). Known-groups validity was supported by significant differences in WPQ-Tr scores between individuals with CLBP and pain-free controls (p < 0.01). PCA indicated a unidimensional structure explaining 54.66% of the variance, supported by CFA. Convergent validity was supported by strong correlations with EQ-5D-5L (ρ = 0.902), PCS (ρ = -0.923), CSI (ρ = -0.923), PSQI (ρ = -0.794), RMDQ (ρ = -0.893), and GAD-7 (ρ = -0.828) (all p < 0.01).ConclusionThe WPQ-Tr is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing well-being in Turkish-speaking individuals with CLBP.

土耳其版疼痛幸福感问卷:慢性腰痛患者的跨文化适应、验证和测量特性评估。
疼痛幸福感问卷(WPQ)评估慢性疼痛患者的心理社会方面。目的将WPQ量表翻译成土耳其语(WPQ- tr),并评估其在慢性腰痛(CLBP)患者中的心理测量特性。方法本研究共纳入155名受试者(CLBP患者105名,无痛对照组50名)。跨文化适应遵循指导原则。心理测量评估了内部一致性、重测信度、结构效度、已知组效度和收敛效度。采用主成分分析(PCA)和验证性因子分析(CFA)检验结构效度。通过比较CLBP和无痛对照组的WPQ-Tr评分来评估已知组的效度。通过WPQ-Tr评分与EuroQol 5维5级问卷(EQ-5D-5L)、疼痛化量表(PCS)、匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、Roland-Morris残疾问卷(RMDQ)、中枢敏化量表(CSI)和广泛性焦虑障碍-7 (GAD-7)的相关性来评估趋同效度。结果WPQ-Tr具有良好的内部一致性(Cronbach’s α = 0.713)。重测信度极好,类内相关系数为0.987 (95% CI: 0.972 ~ 0.994)。CLBP患者与无痛对照组之间WPQ-Tr评分的显著差异支持了已知组效度(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
194
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation is a journal whose main focus is to present relevant information about the interdisciplinary approach to musculoskeletal rehabilitation for clinicians who treat patients with back and musculoskeletal pain complaints. It will provide readers with both 1) a general fund of knowledge on the assessment and management of specific problems and 2) new information considered to be state-of-the-art in the field. The intended audience is multidisciplinary as well as multi-specialty. In each issue clinicians can find information which they can use in their patient setting the very next day.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书