Personalized risk prediction of financial toxicity in patients with cancer: an interpretable machine learning study.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Haluk Damgacioglu, Kalyani Sonawane, Gerard A Silvestri, Katherine R Sterba, Elizabeth G Hill, Scott B Cantor, Evan M Graboyes, Ashish A Deshmukh
{"title":"Personalized risk prediction of financial toxicity in patients with cancer: an interpretable machine learning study.","authors":"Haluk Damgacioglu, Kalyani Sonawane, Gerard A Silvestri, Katherine R Sterba, Elizabeth G Hill, Scott B Cantor, Evan M Graboyes, Ashish A Deshmukh","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Financial toxicity (FT), the economic stress from medical care, is common among people with cancer and is associated with worse health outcomes. While risk factors for FT are known, personalized FT risk prediction tools to help mitigate FT are lacking.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict FT risk using data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey-Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement for patients undergoing or within one year of cancer treatment. FT was defined as the presence of > 1 of the following: bankruptcy, unpaid medical bills, payment concerns, or debt. Several models were trained using demographic, clinical, economic, and social variables. Fine-tuning was performed to enhance sensitivity in predicting FT. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability of the model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 793 people with cancer, 283 (36%) experienced FT. A fine-tuned random forest algorithm achieved an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.91) and an accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.85), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.66 to 0.83), demonstrating balanced classification performance. SHAP values identified key predictors of FT risk, including younger age, lower income, higher medical expenditures, and poorer health status. To support clinical implementation, we developed a web-based FT risk calculator (https://hd-research.shinyapps.io/ftriskcalc/).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The fine-tuned random forest algorithm resulted in promising results for predicting personalized FT risk. Integrated into a web-based calculator, the model has strong potential to help mitigate FT by identifying high-risk patients early in the cancer care continuum.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Financial toxicity (FT), the economic stress from medical care, is common among people with cancer and is associated with worse health outcomes. While risk factors for FT are known, personalized FT risk prediction tools to help mitigate FT are lacking.

Methods: This study developed and evaluated machine learning models to predict FT risk using data from the Medical Expenditures Panel Survey-Experiences with Cancer Survivorship Supplement for patients undergoing or within one year of cancer treatment. FT was defined as the presence of > 1 of the following: bankruptcy, unpaid medical bills, payment concerns, or debt. Several models were trained using demographic, clinical, economic, and social variables. Fine-tuning was performed to enhance sensitivity in predicting FT. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were used for interpretability of the model.

Results: Among 793 people with cancer, 283 (36%) experienced FT. A fine-tuned random forest algorithm achieved an AUROC of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.78 to 0.91) and an accuracy of 0.78 (95% CI = 0.71 to 0.85), with a sensitivity of 0.84 (95% CI = 0.72 to 0.92) and specificity of 0.75 (95% CI = 0.66 to 0.83), demonstrating balanced classification performance. SHAP values identified key predictors of FT risk, including younger age, lower income, higher medical expenditures, and poorer health status. To support clinical implementation, we developed a web-based FT risk calculator (https://hd-research.shinyapps.io/ftriskcalc/).

Conclusion: The fine-tuned random forest algorithm resulted in promising results for predicting personalized FT risk. Integrated into a web-based calculator, the model has strong potential to help mitigate FT by identifying high-risk patients early in the cancer care continuum.

癌症患者财务毒性的个性化风险预测:一项可解释的机器学习研究。
背景:金融毒性(Financial toxicity, FT),即医疗保健带来的经济压力,在癌症患者中很常见,并与较差的健康结果相关。虽然已知FT的风险因素,但缺乏个性化的FT风险预测工具来帮助减轻FT。方法:本研究开发并评估了机器学习模型,使用来自医疗支出小组调查的数据来预测FT风险——接受癌症治疗或在一年内接受癌症治疗的患者的癌症生存补充经验。金融危机被定义为存在以下情况中的110个:破产、未付医药费、付款问题或债务。使用人口统计、临床、经济和社会变量训练了几个模型。进行微调以提高预测FT的灵敏度。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)用于模型的可解释性。结果:在793名癌症患者中,283人(36%)经历了FT。一种微调随机森林算法的AUROC为0.84 (95% CI = 0.78至0.91),准确率为0.78 (95% CI = 0.71至0.85),灵敏度为0.84 (95% CI = 0.72至0.92),特异性为0.75 (95% CI = 0.66至0.83),显示出平衡的分类性能。SHAP值确定了FT风险的关键预测因素,包括年龄较小、收入较低、医疗支出较高和健康状况较差。为了支持临床实施,我们开发了一个基于网络的FT风险计算器(https://hd-research.shinyapps.io/ftriskcalc/)。结论:微调随机森林算法在预测个性化FT风险方面取得了令人满意的结果。将该模型集成到基于网络的计算器中,通过在癌症治疗连续体的早期识别高风险患者,该模型具有很大的潜力,可以帮助减轻FT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书