Advanced machine learning model for Cobb angle progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with surface topography: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.
José María González Ruiz, Judith Salat-Batlle, Macarena Alejandra Rodas Rivas, Judith Sánchez-Raya, Joan Bagó, Joan Masnou, Pamela Andrea Espinoza Poblete, Marco Morillo Armendariz, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Bruna Nichele da Rosa, Zeinab Estaji, Lindsey Westover
{"title":"Advanced machine learning model for Cobb angle progression in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis with surface topography: a multicenter, prospective, observational study.","authors":"José María González Ruiz, Judith Salat-Batlle, Macarena Alejandra Rodas Rivas, Judith Sánchez-Raya, Joan Bagó, Joan Masnou, Pamela Andrea Espinoza Poblete, Marco Morillo Armendariz, Susana Núñez-Pereira, Bruna Nichele da Rosa, Zeinab Estaji, Lindsey Westover","doi":"10.1007/s00586-026-09992-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Excessive radiographic exposure in the follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains a clinical concern. Surface topography (ST) and angle of trunk rotation (ATR) have shown promise for non-radiographic monitoring, although their ability to detect clinically meaningful Cobb angle changes (> 5°) remains limited. This study aimed to validate a machine learning model for predicting Cobb angle progression using ST parameters and ATR obtained at three and six months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A prospective observational study was conducted in 43 AIS patients (57 curves) recruited from two centers. Baseline and six-month radiographic Cobb angles were recorded along with ATR and five ST asymmetry parameters (MaxDev, RMS, LatDev, hump volume, asymmetry patch area). A random forest (RF) model was used to predict Cobb angles at 3 and 6 months and then to estimate progression over 6 months (ΔCobb). Outcomes were classified as improvement (ΔCobb < -5°), stabilization (-5° ≤ ΔCobb ≤ + 5°), or progression (ΔCobb > + 5°).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The RF model predicted the six-month radiographic Cobb with MAE of 7.03° (three-month input) and 6.91° (six-month input). The progression model integrating both time points achieved an overall accuracy of 80.7%, with detection accuracies of 100% for stabilization, 53.8% for improvement, and 37.5% for progression. Quantitatively, 84.2% of the curves had a progression prediction error of less than 5°.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model accurately identified stabilized cases, suggesting that non-radiographic follow-up combining ST and ATR could reliably detect non-progressive AIS within six months. This approach could potentially reduce up to 80% of unnecessary follow-up radiographs in stable patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-026-09992-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Excessive radiographic exposure in the follow-up of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) remains a clinical concern. Surface topography (ST) and angle of trunk rotation (ATR) have shown promise for non-radiographic monitoring, although their ability to detect clinically meaningful Cobb angle changes (> 5°) remains limited. This study aimed to validate a machine learning model for predicting Cobb angle progression using ST parameters and ATR obtained at three and six months.
Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in 43 AIS patients (57 curves) recruited from two centers. Baseline and six-month radiographic Cobb angles were recorded along with ATR and five ST asymmetry parameters (MaxDev, RMS, LatDev, hump volume, asymmetry patch area). A random forest (RF) model was used to predict Cobb angles at 3 and 6 months and then to estimate progression over 6 months (ΔCobb). Outcomes were classified as improvement (ΔCobb < -5°), stabilization (-5° ≤ ΔCobb ≤ + 5°), or progression (ΔCobb > + 5°).
Results: The RF model predicted the six-month radiographic Cobb with MAE of 7.03° (three-month input) and 6.91° (six-month input). The progression model integrating both time points achieved an overall accuracy of 80.7%, with detection accuracies of 100% for stabilization, 53.8% for improvement, and 37.5% for progression. Quantitatively, 84.2% of the curves had a progression prediction error of less than 5°.
Conclusion: The model accurately identified stabilized cases, suggesting that non-radiographic follow-up combining ST and ATR could reliably detect non-progressive AIS within six months. This approach could potentially reduce up to 80% of unnecessary follow-up radiographs in stable patients.
期刊介绍:
"European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts.
Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe