Postmortem MRI reveals distinct structural features in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Open Pub Date : 2026-05-08 DOI:10.1002/epi4.70276
Andrea Hill, Fenglai Xiao, Maria Thom, David Maudgil, Hannah Bergman, John S Duncan, Owen J Arthurs, Josemir W Sander, Beate Diehl, Matthias J Koepp
{"title":"Postmortem MRI reveals distinct structural features in sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.","authors":"Andrea Hill, Fenglai Xiao, Maria Thom, David Maudgil, Hannah Bergman, John S Duncan, Owen J Arthurs, Josemir W Sander, Beate Diehl, Matthias J Koepp","doi":"10.1002/epi4.70276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities have been reported in individuals who later die from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), but their specificity and predictive value remain uncertain. Postmortem MRI (PM-MRI) offers a unique opportunity to distinguish structural features associated with SUDEP from changes related to epilepsy, comorbid illness, or the postmortem interval. We performed PM-MRI in nine individuals: five with suspected SUDEP, two with epilepsy who died from non-seizure-related causes, and two without epilepsy who died from sudden cardiac death. Hippocampal, amygdala, and subcortical volumes were quantified using validated segmentation methods and compared with 70 healthy in vivo controls. Compared with non-SUDEP cases, SUDEP cases showed significantly larger hippocampal (p = 0.014) and amygdala (p = 0.023) volumes, with most exceeding the healthy control mean, whereas non-SUDEP cases consistently demonstrated volume reductions. These findings parallel in vivo MRI observations in individuals at high risk of SUDEP and are consistent with transient peri- or postictal structural changes. In the context of recent large-scale studies showing few validated clinical SUDEP biomarkers beyond frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures and sleeping alone, PM-MRI may provide an objective approach to positively identifying individuals who died from SUDEP. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans taken after death to study brain changes in people who died from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We found that certain brain areas involved in seizure control and automatic body functions, such as breathing and heart rate, were larger in people who died from SUDEP than in people who died from other causes. These changes were similar to those previously seen on brain scans of people with epilepsy who are known to be at higher risk of SUDEP while they were still alive. Our findings suggest that postmortem MRI may help identify brain changes linked to SUDEP.</p>","PeriodicalId":12038,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.70276","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) abnormalities have been reported in individuals who later die from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP), but their specificity and predictive value remain uncertain. Postmortem MRI (PM-MRI) offers a unique opportunity to distinguish structural features associated with SUDEP from changes related to epilepsy, comorbid illness, or the postmortem interval. We performed PM-MRI in nine individuals: five with suspected SUDEP, two with epilepsy who died from non-seizure-related causes, and two without epilepsy who died from sudden cardiac death. Hippocampal, amygdala, and subcortical volumes were quantified using validated segmentation methods and compared with 70 healthy in vivo controls. Compared with non-SUDEP cases, SUDEP cases showed significantly larger hippocampal (p = 0.014) and amygdala (p = 0.023) volumes, with most exceeding the healthy control mean, whereas non-SUDEP cases consistently demonstrated volume reductions. These findings parallel in vivo MRI observations in individuals at high risk of SUDEP and are consistent with transient peri- or postictal structural changes. In the context of recent large-scale studies showing few validated clinical SUDEP biomarkers beyond frequent generalized tonic-clonic seizures and sleeping alone, PM-MRI may provide an objective approach to positively identifying individuals who died from SUDEP. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: We used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans taken after death to study brain changes in people who died from sudden unexpected death in epilepsy (SUDEP). We found that certain brain areas involved in seizure control and automatic body functions, such as breathing and heart rate, were larger in people who died from SUDEP than in people who died from other causes. These changes were similar to those previously seen on brain scans of people with epilepsy who are known to be at higher risk of SUDEP while they were still alive. Our findings suggest that postmortem MRI may help identify brain changes linked to SUDEP.

尸检MRI显示癫痫猝死的明显结构特征。
磁共振成像(MRI)异常在后来死于癫痫猝死(SUDEP)的个体中有报道,但其特异性和预测价值仍不确定。尸检MRI (PM-MRI)提供了一个独特的机会来区分与SUDEP相关的结构特征与癫痫、合并症或死后间隙相关的变化。我们对9名患者进行了PM-MRI检查:5名疑似SUDEP患者,2名癫痫患者死于非癫痫相关原因,2名非癫痫患者死于心源性猝死。海马、杏仁核和皮质下体积采用有效的分割方法进行量化,并与70个健康的体内对照进行比较。与非SUDEP患者相比,SUDEP患者的海马(p = 0.014)和杏仁核(p = 0.023)体积显著增大,大多数超过健康对照的平均水平,而非SUDEP患者的体积持续缩小。这些发现与SUDEP高风险个体的体内MRI观察结果相一致,并且与短暂的周围或后结构变化一致。在最近的大规模研究背景下,除了频繁的全身性强直阵挛发作和单独睡眠外,几乎没有证实的临床SUDEP生物标志物,PM-MRI可能提供一种客观的方法来积极识别死于SUDEP的个体。摘要:我们使用死亡后的磁共振成像(MRI)扫描来研究死于癫痫猝死(SUDEP)的人的大脑变化。我们发现,死于SUDEP的人大脑中涉及癫痫控制和自动身体功能(如呼吸和心率)的某些区域比死于其他原因的人更大。这些变化与之前在癫痫患者的脑部扫描中看到的变化相似,这些癫痫患者在活着的时候患猝死症的风险更高。我们的研究结果表明,死后MRI可能有助于识别与SUDEP相关的大脑变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia Open
Epilepsia Open Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
104
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书