Prehospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (REBOARREST): an international, multicentre, open label, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Jostein Rødseth Brede, Bjørn Hoftun Farbu, Lorenzo Gamberini, Kjetil Thorsen, Marius Rehn, Leif Rognås, Kristin Tønsager, Geir Arne Sunde, Magnus Lauritzen, Cristian Lupi, Marco Tartaglione, Eivinn Årdal Skjaerseth, Margrete Aaen, Rune Wiseth, Andreas Jørstad Krüger
{"title":"Prehospital resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta in non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (REBOARREST): an international, multicentre, open label, pragmatic, randomised, controlled trial.","authors":"Jostein Rødseth Brede, Bjørn Hoftun Farbu, Lorenzo Gamberini, Kjetil Thorsen, Marius Rehn, Leif Rognås, Kristin Tønsager, Geir Arne Sunde, Magnus Lauritzen, Cristian Lupi, Marco Tartaglione, Eivinn Årdal Skjaerseth, Margrete Aaen, Rune Wiseth, Andreas Jørstad Krüger","doi":"10.1186/s13054-026-06057-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest do not achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may increase blood pressure proximal to the ballon. If this technique is used during advanced life support (ALS), and occlusion is performed in the thoracic aorta, it may augment aortic pressure and coronary perfusion pressure. We investigated whether prehospital REBOA as an adjunct to ALS increased the rate of ROSC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>REBOARREST was a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted at 12 sites in Norway, Denmark, and Italy. Adult patients (18-80 years) with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a control group that received ALS or to an intervention group that received ALS combined with REBOA as an adjunct. Fulfilment of eligibility criteria was determined by the physician on scene and sealed envelopes were used to allocate patients. The statistician that performed the analyses was blinded for group allocation. The primary outcome was sustained ROSC, defined as lasting ≥ 20 min, assessed in the intention-to-treat population.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From June 7, 2021, to June 28, 2025, 200 patients were randomly assigned to the study groups. Due to lack of consent 21 patients dropped out of the trial, hence data from 179 patients are presented, 88 in the intervention group and 91 in the control group. Most patients were male (76%), with median age of 68 years (IQR 58-74). Median time from arrest to randomisation was 33 min (IQR 23-39) in the intervention group and 29 min (IQR 23-38) in the control group. Twenty-five of 88 patients (28%) in the intervention group and 24 of 91 patients (26%) in the control group achieved sustained ROSC (adjusted risk difference 1.8% [-11, 15, 95% CI], p = 0.78). Adverse events were registered in 19 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a strategy of prehospital deployment of REBOA as an adjunct to ALS was feasible but did not significantly improve rates of sustained ROSC compared to ALS alone. Deployment of prehospital REBOA is safe and manageable in a two-person team with low procedure time.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04596514. Registered 22.10.2020.</p>","PeriodicalId":10811,"journal":{"name":"Critical Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-026-06057-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Most patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest do not achieve sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). Resuscitative endovascular balloon occlusion of the aorta (REBOA) may increase blood pressure proximal to the ballon. If this technique is used during advanced life support (ALS), and occlusion is performed in the thoracic aorta, it may augment aortic pressure and coronary perfusion pressure. We investigated whether prehospital REBOA as an adjunct to ALS increased the rate of ROSC.

Methods: REBOARREST was a pragmatic, parallel-group, multicentre, randomised controlled trial conducted at 12 sites in Norway, Denmark, and Italy. Adult patients (18-80 years) with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest were randomly assigned (1:1) to either a control group that received ALS or to an intervention group that received ALS combined with REBOA as an adjunct. Fulfilment of eligibility criteria was determined by the physician on scene and sealed envelopes were used to allocate patients. The statistician that performed the analyses was blinded for group allocation. The primary outcome was sustained ROSC, defined as lasting ≥ 20 min, assessed in the intention-to-treat population.

Results: From June 7, 2021, to June 28, 2025, 200 patients were randomly assigned to the study groups. Due to lack of consent 21 patients dropped out of the trial, hence data from 179 patients are presented, 88 in the intervention group and 91 in the control group. Most patients were male (76%), with median age of 68 years (IQR 58-74). Median time from arrest to randomisation was 33 min (IQR 23-39) in the intervention group and 29 min (IQR 23-38) in the control group. Twenty-five of 88 patients (28%) in the intervention group and 24 of 91 patients (26%) in the control group achieved sustained ROSC (adjusted risk difference 1.8% [-11, 15, 95% CI], p = 0.78). Adverse events were registered in 19 patients.

Conclusions: Among patients with non-traumatic out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, a strategy of prehospital deployment of REBOA as an adjunct to ALS was feasible but did not significantly improve rates of sustained ROSC compared to ALS alone. Deployment of prehospital REBOA is safe and manageable in a two-person team with low procedure time.

Trial registration: Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04596514. Registered 22.10.2020.

非创伤性院外心脏骤停(REBOARREST)的院前复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉:一项国际、多中心、开放标签、实用、随机、对照试验。
背景:大多数院外心脏骤停患者不能实现持续的自然循环恢复(ROSC)。复苏血管内球囊阻塞主动脉(REBOA)可使球囊近端血压升高。如果在晚期生命支持(ALS)中使用这种技术,并且在胸主动脉中进行封堵,它可能会增加主动脉压和冠状动脉灌注压。我们调查院前REBOA作为ALS的辅助治疗是否会增加ROSC的发生率。方法:REBOARREST是一项实用、平行组、多中心、随机对照试验,在挪威、丹麦和意大利的12个地点进行。非创伤性院外心脏骤停的成年患者(18-80岁)被随机(1:1)分配到接受ALS治疗的对照组或接受ALS联合REBOA作为辅助治疗的干预组。合格标准的实现由现场医生确定,并使用密封信封来分配患者。进行分组分析的统计学家采用盲法。主要终点是持续ROSC,定义为持续≥20分钟,在意向治疗人群中进行评估。结果:从2021年6月7日至2025年6月28日,200例患者被随机分配到研究组。由于缺乏同意,21例患者退出了试验,因此提供了179例患者的数据,干预组88例,对照组91例。大多数患者为男性(76%),中位年龄68岁(IQR 58-74)。干预组从骤停到随机化的中位时间为33分钟(IQR 23-39),对照组为29分钟(IQR 23-38)。干预组88例患者中有25例(28%)达到持续ROSC,对照组91例患者中有24例(26%)达到持续ROSC(校正风险差为1.8% [- 11,15,95% CI], p = 0.78)。19例患者出现不良事件。结论:在非创伤性院外心脏骤停患者中,院前部署REBOA作为ALS的辅助策略是可行的,但与单独ALS相比,并没有显著提高持续ROSC的发生率。院前REBOA的部署是安全的,并且在一个两人小组中易于管理,程序时间短。试验注册:Clinicaltrials.gov ID NCT04596514。22.10.2020注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Critical Care
Critical Care 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
20.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
348
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: Critical Care is an esteemed international medical journal that undergoes a rigorous peer-review process to maintain its high quality standards. Its primary objective is to enhance the healthcare services offered to critically ill patients. To achieve this, the journal focuses on gathering, exchanging, disseminating, and endorsing evidence-based information that is highly relevant to intensivists. By doing so, Critical Care seeks to provide a thorough and inclusive examination of the intensive care field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书