Association of postoperative delirium with haemodynamic determinants of cerebral perfusion pressure during cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.

IF 9.2 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Lee A Goeddel, Jonathan Gomez, Marina Hernandez, Lily Koffman, Zachary Murphy, Grace Wayson, Glenn Whitman, Karen Bandeen-Roche, John Muschelli, Ciprian M Crainiceanu, Nauder Faraday, Charles H Brown
{"title":"Association of postoperative delirium with haemodynamic determinants of cerebral perfusion pressure during cardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.","authors":"Lee A Goeddel, Jonathan Gomez, Marina Hernandez, Lily Koffman, Zachary Murphy, Grace Wayson, Glenn Whitman, Karen Bandeen-Roche, John Muschelli, Ciprian M Crainiceanu, Nauder Faraday, Charles H Brown","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Delirium is common after cardiac surgery, and an important factor could be cerebral perfusion. As cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is determined by the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP), which are modifiable factors, understanding their relationship with delirium is essential.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing cardiac surgery were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Haemodynamic exposures were calculated as time spent in narrow ranges: 14 MAP ranges in increments of 5 mm Hg (45-115), 10 CVP ranges in increments of 2 mm Hg (0-20), and 70 joint MAP/CVP ranges. Separate regression models estimated odds ratios for each range (or predefined zones of adjacent ranges), adjusted for covariates and multiple comparisons. Simulations estimated the effect of redistributing MAP/CVP exposures.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 1759 patients, 345 (19.6%) developed delirium. In predefined zones that grouped MAP and CVP ranges, delirium was associated with time spent in the cerebral hypoperfusion zone (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.03, P=0.04). Simulated reductions of time in zones of cerebral hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion reduced delirium, particularly in patients with prolonged exposures to these zones. There were also associations between delirium and time in individual haemodynamic ranges of high CVP/low MAP (hypoperfusion) and high MAP/low CVP (hyperperfusion).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Delirium was associated with a zone of low cerebral perfusion pressure in adjusted models and individual ranges of low and high cerebral perfusion pressures. Trials to assess whether optimising cerebral perfusion reduces delirium are needed but may require large enrolment or prognostic enrichment.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2026.03.018","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Delirium is common after cardiac surgery, and an important factor could be cerebral perfusion. As cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) is determined by the difference between mean arterial pressure (MAP) and central venous pressure (CVP), which are modifiable factors, understanding their relationship with delirium is essential.

Methods: In a retrospective cohort study, patients undergoing cardiac surgery were assessed for delirium using the Confusion Assessment Method for the ICU. Haemodynamic exposures were calculated as time spent in narrow ranges: 14 MAP ranges in increments of 5 mm Hg (45-115), 10 CVP ranges in increments of 2 mm Hg (0-20), and 70 joint MAP/CVP ranges. Separate regression models estimated odds ratios for each range (or predefined zones of adjacent ranges), adjusted for covariates and multiple comparisons. Simulations estimated the effect of redistributing MAP/CVP exposures.

Results: In 1759 patients, 345 (19.6%) developed delirium. In predefined zones that grouped MAP and CVP ranges, delirium was associated with time spent in the cerebral hypoperfusion zone (adjusted odds ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 1.00-1.03, P=0.04). Simulated reductions of time in zones of cerebral hypoperfusion and hyperperfusion reduced delirium, particularly in patients with prolonged exposures to these zones. There were also associations between delirium and time in individual haemodynamic ranges of high CVP/low MAP (hypoperfusion) and high MAP/low CVP (hyperperfusion).

Conclusions: Delirium was associated with a zone of low cerebral perfusion pressure in adjusted models and individual ranges of low and high cerebral perfusion pressures. Trials to assess whether optimising cerebral perfusion reduces delirium are needed but may require large enrolment or prognostic enrichment.

术后谵妄与心脏手术中脑灌注压血流动力学决定因素的关联:一项回顾性队列研究。
背景:心脏手术后谵妄很常见,脑灌注可能是一个重要因素。由于脑灌注压(CPP)是由平均动脉压(MAP)和中心静脉压(CVP)之差决定的,这是一个可改变的因素,了解它们与谵妄的关系是必要的。方法:在一项回顾性队列研究中,对接受心脏手术的患者使用ICU的神志不清评估法评估谵妄。血流动力学暴露以在狭窄范围内花费的时间计算:14个MAP范围(增量为5毫米汞柱(45-115)),10个CVP范围(增量为2毫米汞柱(0-20))和70个联合MAP/CVP范围。单独的回归模型估计每个范围(或相邻范围的预定义区域)的优势比,并根据协变量和多重比较进行调整。模拟估计了重新分配MAP/CVP暴露的影响。结果:1759例患者中345例(19.6%)出现谵妄。在划分MAP和CVP范围的预定义区域中,谵妄与大脑低灌注区停留时间相关(校正优势比1.02,95%置信区间1.00-1.03,P=0.04)。模拟减少大脑低灌注区和高灌注区时间可减少谵妄,特别是长时间暴露于这些区域的患者。在高CVP/低MAP(低灌注)和高MAP/低CVP(高灌注)的个体血流动力学范围内,谵妄与时间之间也存在关联。结论:在调整后的模型中,谵妄与低脑灌注压区和个体低、高脑灌注压范围有关。评估优化脑灌注是否能减少谵妄的试验是必要的,但可能需要大量的入组或预后富集。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书