Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in critically ill ACLF patients: a retrospective single center cohort study.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Miriam Dibos, Maja Wossnig, Silke Wunderlich, Roland M Schmid, Ulrich Mayr, Tobias Lahmer, Julian Triebelhorn
{"title":"Risk of intracranial hemorrhage in critically ill ACLF patients: a retrospective single center cohort study.","authors":"Miriam Dibos, Maja Wossnig, Silke Wunderlich, Roland M Schmid, Ulrich Mayr, Tobias Lahmer, Julian Triebelhorn","doi":"10.1186/s12876-026-04875-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis present numerous challenges in clinical evaluation of bleeding risk. Their deficiencies in both pro- and anticoagulant factors result in a particularly fragile hemostatic system and bleeding complications. While the risk of the particular bleeding complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a major clinical concern, the question of whether ICH occurs more frequently in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) compared to a control group and which parameters predict cerebral bleeding, remain unresolved and was the aim of this study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>One hundred two critically ill ACLF patients and 166 patients in the control group were included retrospectively. Clinical parameters and occurrence of spontaneous ICH were compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cerebral computer tomography detected ICH in 15 out of 102 patients (14.7%) in the ACLF group compared to 16 out of 166 patients (9.6%) in the control group. While patients in the ACLF group exhibited prolonged prothrombin time (pTT) (median [IQR]: (57 [45-71] s vs. 42 [35-52] s, p < 0.001) and higher INR values (1.9 [1.5-2.4] vs. 1.2 [1.1-1.4], p < 0.001), significantly lower platelet count compared to control group (43 [24-64] × 10³/µL vs. 87 [39-159] × 10³/µL, p < 0.001) as risk factors for cerebral bleeding, statistical analysis revealed a trend towards a higher incidence among patients in the ACLF group compared to controls (OR: 1.61, chi-square-test, p-value = 0.24).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although statistical analysis showed a tendency to a higher incidence of ICH in the ACLF group compared to controls, ICH did not occur significantly more frequently in patients with ACLF. While no correlation was shown between the occurrence of ICH and high systolic blood pressure or dysregulated INR and pTT, low platelet counts were associated with spontaneous ICH in both groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":9129,"journal":{"name":"BMC Gastroenterology","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-026-04875-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Critically ill patients with liver cirrhosis present numerous challenges in clinical evaluation of bleeding risk. Their deficiencies in both pro- and anticoagulant factors result in a particularly fragile hemostatic system and bleeding complications. While the risk of the particular bleeding complication of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a major clinical concern, the question of whether ICH occurs more frequently in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) compared to a control group and which parameters predict cerebral bleeding, remain unresolved and was the aim of this study.

Methods: One hundred two critically ill ACLF patients and 166 patients in the control group were included retrospectively. Clinical parameters and occurrence of spontaneous ICH were compared to controls.

Results: Cerebral computer tomography detected ICH in 15 out of 102 patients (14.7%) in the ACLF group compared to 16 out of 166 patients (9.6%) in the control group. While patients in the ACLF group exhibited prolonged prothrombin time (pTT) (median [IQR]: (57 [45-71] s vs. 42 [35-52] s, p < 0.001) and higher INR values (1.9 [1.5-2.4] vs. 1.2 [1.1-1.4], p < 0.001), significantly lower platelet count compared to control group (43 [24-64] × 10³/µL vs. 87 [39-159] × 10³/µL, p < 0.001) as risk factors for cerebral bleeding, statistical analysis revealed a trend towards a higher incidence among patients in the ACLF group compared to controls (OR: 1.61, chi-square-test, p-value = 0.24).

Conclusions: Although statistical analysis showed a tendency to a higher incidence of ICH in the ACLF group compared to controls, ICH did not occur significantly more frequently in patients with ACLF. While no correlation was shown between the occurrence of ICH and high systolic blood pressure or dysregulated INR and pTT, low platelet counts were associated with spontaneous ICH in both groups.

危重ACLF患者颅内出血的风险:一项回顾性单中心队列研究
背景:肝硬化危重患者出血风险的临床评估面临诸多挑战。它们在促凝因子和抗凝因子方面的缺陷导致了一个特别脆弱的止血系统和出血并发症。虽然脑出血(ICH)的特殊出血并发症的风险是一个主要的临床问题,但与对照组相比,急性慢性肝衰竭(ACLF)患者是否更频繁地发生脑出血以及哪些参数预测脑出血的问题仍未解决,这也是本研究的目的。方法:回顾性分析ACLF危重患者102例,对照组166例。将自发性脑出血的临床参数和发生率与对照组进行比较。结果:ACLF组102例患者中有15例(14.7%)出现脑出血,对照组166例患者中有16例(9.6%)出现脑出血。而ACLF组患者凝血酶原时间(pTT)延长(中位数[IQR]: 57 [45-71] s vs. 42 [35-52] s, p)。结论:虽然统计分析显示ACLF组脑出血发生率高于对照组,但ACLF患者脑出血发生率并没有明显增加。虽然脑出血的发生与高收缩压或INR和pTT失调之间没有相关性,但两组中血小板计数低与自发性脑出血有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Gastroenterology
BMC Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
465
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Gastroenterology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of the prevention, diagnosis and management of gastrointestinal and hepatobiliary disorders, as well as related molecular genetics, pathophysiology, and epidemiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书