Closing the loop on tourniquet safety in distal radius fracture fixation surgery: a two-cycle quality improvement project.

IF 1.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Mahmoud Mersal, Samer Sarofeen, Osama Embaby, Sara Shammout, Ciara O'Sullivan, Chloe Lawrence, Sitaram Giri
{"title":"Closing the loop on tourniquet safety in distal radius fracture fixation surgery: a two-cycle quality improvement project.","authors":"Mahmoud Mersal, Samer Sarofeen, Osama Embaby, Sara Shammout, Ciara O'Sullivan, Chloe Lawrence, Sitaram Giri","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The application of intraoperative tourniquets is a fundamental component of distal radius fracture surgery, yet it carries a risk of significant complications. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has published safety guidelines (BOA Standards for Trauma (BOAST)) to standardise practice, but adherence is often suboptimal. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve compliance with these guidelines in a real-world clinical setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A two-cycle retrospective audit was conducted at a major trauma centre in the UK. The first cycle (January to April 2023, n=34) established baseline compliance with seven key BOAST documentation standards. Following this, a multifaceted intervention was implemented, including staff education, the introduction of a standardised checklist and the placement of visual reminders in operating theatres. A re-audit was then conducted (May to June 2024, n=63) to measure the impact of these interventions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline documentation compliance was extremely low, with only tourniquet pressure recorded in 20.5% (7/34) and tourniquet time documented in 55.9% (19/34). Following the interventions, documentation of tourniquet pressure increased to 59.0% (37/63) and tourniquet site, padding, compressive exsanguination, skin condition, tourniquet size and tourniquet time showed modest improvements. Overall compliance, however, remained below optimal levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A targeted quality improvement initiative combining education and practical tools can lead to meaningful improvements in adherence to tourniquet safety guidelines. Despite these gains, persistent documentation gaps highlight the need for more robust, system-level solutions, such as integration into electronic health records, to ensure sustained compliance and enhance patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"15 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13141160/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003956","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The application of intraoperative tourniquets is a fundamental component of distal radius fracture surgery, yet it carries a risk of significant complications. The British Orthopaedic Association (BOA) has published safety guidelines (BOA Standards for Trauma (BOAST)) to standardise practice, but adherence is often suboptimal. This quality improvement project aimed to evaluate and improve compliance with these guidelines in a real-world clinical setting.

Methods: A two-cycle retrospective audit was conducted at a major trauma centre in the UK. The first cycle (January to April 2023, n=34) established baseline compliance with seven key BOAST documentation standards. Following this, a multifaceted intervention was implemented, including staff education, the introduction of a standardised checklist and the placement of visual reminders in operating theatres. A re-audit was then conducted (May to June 2024, n=63) to measure the impact of these interventions.

Results: Baseline documentation compliance was extremely low, with only tourniquet pressure recorded in 20.5% (7/34) and tourniquet time documented in 55.9% (19/34). Following the interventions, documentation of tourniquet pressure increased to 59.0% (37/63) and tourniquet site, padding, compressive exsanguination, skin condition, tourniquet size and tourniquet time showed modest improvements. Overall compliance, however, remained below optimal levels.

Conclusions: A targeted quality improvement initiative combining education and practical tools can lead to meaningful improvements in adherence to tourniquet safety guidelines. Despite these gains, persistent documentation gaps highlight the need for more robust, system-level solutions, such as integration into electronic health records, to ensure sustained compliance and enhance patient safety.

桡骨远端骨折固定手术中止血带安全性的闭环:两周期质量改善工程。
背景:术中止血带的应用是桡骨远端骨折手术的基本组成部分,但它也存在严重并发症的风险。英国骨科协会(BOA)已经发布了安全指南(BOA创伤标准(自夸))来规范实践,但是依从性往往不是最佳的。这个质量改进项目旨在评估和提高在现实世界的临床环境中对这些指南的依从性。方法:在英国的一个主要创伤中心进行了两个周期的回顾性审计。第一个周期(2023年1月至4月,n=34)建立了七个关键的自夸文件标准的基线遵从性。在此之后,实施了多方面的干预措施,包括工作人员教育、采用标准化检查表和在手术室放置视觉提醒。然后进行了一次重新审计(2024年5月至6月,n=63),以衡量这些干预措施的影响。结果:基线文件依从性极低,仅记录止血带压力20.5%(7/34),记录止血带时间55.9%(19/34)。干预后,止血带压力增加到59.0%(37/63),止血带部位、填充物、压缩出血、皮肤状况、止血带大小和止血带时间均有适度改善。然而,总体依从性仍低于最佳水平。结论:有针对性的质量改进倡议结合教育和实用工具可以导致对止血带安全指南的遵守有意义的改进。尽管取得了这些成果,但持续存在的文档缺口突出表明,需要更强大的系统级解决方案,例如将其集成到电子健康记录中,以确保持续的合规性并加强患者安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Quality
BMJ Open Quality Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
226
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书