Adherence to infection prevention and control best practices in emergency units at a tertiary care hospital, Riyadh.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Majid Al Shamrani, Aiman El-Saed, Sarah Al-Fayez, Lolwah Almousa, Fatema K Alanazi, Mouafaq Alkhodairy, Faisal Almalki, Abdullah F Alanazi, Fatimah Akkam, Kassem Abou Yassine, Salman Alkhodairy, Husam Eid, Saad Almohrij
{"title":"Adherence to infection prevention and control best practices in emergency units at a tertiary care hospital, Riyadh.","authors":"Majid Al Shamrani, Aiman El-Saed, Sarah Al-Fayez, Lolwah Almousa, Fatema K Alanazi, Mouafaq Alkhodairy, Faisal Almalki, Abdullah F Alanazi, Fatimah Akkam, Kassem Abou Yassine, Salman Alkhodairy, Husam Eid, Saad Almohrij","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01598-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Emergency department presents a distinctive challenge for implementation infection prevention and control (IPC), due to their complex and dynamic environment, diverse patient population, and unknown carrier status. The objective was to assess the compliance with a number of IPC practices among a group of healthcare workers (HCWs) working in the emergency department.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a large emergency department at a tertiary care hospital between 2018 and 2023. Data were gathered during observation sessions using a standardized IPC observation form. Observers were either experienced IPC professionals or trained medical students.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 123,947 HCW-specific practices observed, 85,542 (69.0%) were compliant and out of 41,650 unit-specific practices observed, 38,355 (92.1%) were compliant. The compliance was highest in the competence of acute respiratory infection procedures (97.3%), followed by isolation precautions (97.0%), housekeeping (96.8%), disposal of sharps (96.8%), waste management (94.5%), donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE, 72.9%), use of PPE (72.3%), hand hygiene (67.2%), patient sitters (64.1%), and disinfection of medical equipment (61.2%). Nurses across all units had much better compliance than other professions. There were > 10% differences in the compliance across the units, with higher compliance in mainly pediatric compared with adult units. The compliance was highest during the COVID-19 pandemic years.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is considerable variability in implementation of IPC at the emergency department, by practice, profession, unit, and pandemic time. The findings underscore the importance of strategies to improve disinfection of medical equipment, hand hygiene, and adherence of patient sitters.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01598-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Emergency department presents a distinctive challenge for implementation infection prevention and control (IPC), due to their complex and dynamic environment, diverse patient population, and unknown carrier status. The objective was to assess the compliance with a number of IPC practices among a group of healthcare workers (HCWs) working in the emergency department.

Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted at a large emergency department at a tertiary care hospital between 2018 and 2023. Data were gathered during observation sessions using a standardized IPC observation form. Observers were either experienced IPC professionals or trained medical students.

Results: Out of 123,947 HCW-specific practices observed, 85,542 (69.0%) were compliant and out of 41,650 unit-specific practices observed, 38,355 (92.1%) were compliant. The compliance was highest in the competence of acute respiratory infection procedures (97.3%), followed by isolation precautions (97.0%), housekeeping (96.8%), disposal of sharps (96.8%), waste management (94.5%), donning and doffing of personal protective equipment (PPE, 72.9%), use of PPE (72.3%), hand hygiene (67.2%), patient sitters (64.1%), and disinfection of medical equipment (61.2%). Nurses across all units had much better compliance than other professions. There were > 10% differences in the compliance across the units, with higher compliance in mainly pediatric compared with adult units. The compliance was highest during the COVID-19 pandemic years.

Conclusions: There is considerable variability in implementation of IPC at the emergency department, by practice, profession, unit, and pandemic time. The findings underscore the importance of strategies to improve disinfection of medical equipment, hand hygiene, and adherence of patient sitters.

在利雅得一家三级保健医院的急诊科遵守预防和控制感染的最佳做法。
背景:急诊科因其复杂多变的环境、多样化的患者群体和未知的带菌者状态,对实施感染预防和控制(IPC)提出了独特的挑战。目的是评估在急诊科工作的一组卫生保健工作者(HCWs)对一些IPC做法的遵守情况。方法:2018 - 2023年在某三级医院的大型急诊科进行了一项观察性横断面研究。在观察期间使用标准化IPC观察表收集数据。观察员要么是经验丰富的IPC专业人员,要么是受过训练的医科学生。结果:在观察到的123,947个hcw特定实践中,85,542个(69.0%)符合要求,在观察到的41,650个单位特定实践中,38,355个(92.1%)符合要求。对急性呼吸道感染程序的符合性最高(97.3%),其次是隔离措施(97.0%)、家务管理(96.8%)、利器处理(96.8%)、废物处理(94.5%)、个人防护装备(PPE)的穿戴和脱下(72.9%)、个人防护装备的使用(72.3%)、手卫生(67.2%)、病人看护(64.1%)和医疗设备消毒(61.2%)。所有科室的护士的依从性都比其他职业好得多。各单位的依从性差异约为10%,主要是儿科的依从性高于成人。在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,合规率最高。结论:根据实践、专业、单位和大流行时间不同,急诊科IPC的实施存在相当大的差异。研究结果强调了改善医疗设备消毒、手部卫生和病人看护依从性策略的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书