Comparative effectiveness and safety of vernakalant, flecainide, and amiodarone for atrial fibrillation cardioversion: a propensity score-matched analysis.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Giuseppe Dominijanni, Antonio F Caballero-Bermejo, Álvaro Pineda-Torcuato, Ana Sainz-Herrero, Rosa Capilla-Pueyo, Belén Ruiz-Antorán
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness and safety of vernakalant, flecainide, and amiodarone for atrial fibrillation cardioversion: a propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Giuseppe Dominijanni, Antonio F Caballero-Bermejo, Álvaro Pineda-Torcuato, Ana Sainz-Herrero, Rosa Capilla-Pueyo, Belén Ruiz-Antorán","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01604-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vernakalant is approved in Europe, Canada, and several Asian countries for the pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), but remains unauthorized in the United States due to FDA safety concerns. Its role in emergency department (ED) management of AF requires further comparative evaluation against other agents.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study including all AF episodes treated with intravenous (iv) vernakalant, flecainide, or amiodarone in a single ED between January 2012 and December 2022. Clinical data were extracted from patient records. The primary outcome was sinus rhythm (SR) conversion during the ED stay. Secondary outcomes included time to SR, ED length of stay, AF recurrence, ED revisits, and rehospitalizations within 6 months, as well as adverse events (AEs) occurring during drug infusion or during the ED stay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline confounding. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of demographic and clinical variables on treatment response and safety.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 899 AF episodes (vernakalant: 262; flecainide: 151; amiodarone: 486). SR conversion rates were 76.7% (vernakalant), 69.5% (flecainide), and 67.3% (amiodarone). Median time to SR was significantly shorter with vernakalant (0.25 h), compared to flecainide (2.58 h) and amiodarone (8 h; p < 0.001). Vernakalant was associated with shorter ED stays. During follow-up, ED revisits and rehospitalizations occurred less frequently in vernakalant-treated patients than in amiodarone-treated patients, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given baseline differences between groups. AEs occurred in 15.3% (vernakalant), 16.6% (flecainide), and 12.6% (amiodarone); flecainide showed a higher incidence of AEs of special interest. In patients with NYHA class I-II heart failure, vernakalant showed increased efficacy but also higher AE rates.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Vernakalant showed comparable overall efficacy to amiodarone and flecainide for cardioversion of recent-onset AF, with faster SR conversion and shorter ED stays. However, given the retrospective design, non-random treatment allocation, and baseline differences between groups, these comparative findings should be interpreted with caution. Vernakalant may be a useful option in selected patients when rapid cardioversion is desired.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01604-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Vernakalant is approved in Europe, Canada, and several Asian countries for the pharmacological cardioversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (AF), but remains unauthorized in the United States due to FDA safety concerns. Its role in emergency department (ED) management of AF requires further comparative evaluation against other agents.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study including all AF episodes treated with intravenous (iv) vernakalant, flecainide, or amiodarone in a single ED between January 2012 and December 2022. Clinical data were extracted from patient records. The primary outcome was sinus rhythm (SR) conversion during the ED stay. Secondary outcomes included time to SR, ED length of stay, AF recurrence, ED revisits, and rehospitalizations within 6 months, as well as adverse events (AEs) occurring during drug infusion or during the ED stay. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was applied to adjust for baseline confounding. Subgroup analyses explored the impact of demographic and clinical variables on treatment response and safety.

Results: We analyzed 899 AF episodes (vernakalant: 262; flecainide: 151; amiodarone: 486). SR conversion rates were 76.7% (vernakalant), 69.5% (flecainide), and 67.3% (amiodarone). Median time to SR was significantly shorter with vernakalant (0.25 h), compared to flecainide (2.58 h) and amiodarone (8 h; p < 0.001). Vernakalant was associated with shorter ED stays. During follow-up, ED revisits and rehospitalizations occurred less frequently in vernakalant-treated patients than in amiodarone-treated patients, although these findings should be interpreted cautiously given baseline differences between groups. AEs occurred in 15.3% (vernakalant), 16.6% (flecainide), and 12.6% (amiodarone); flecainide showed a higher incidence of AEs of special interest. In patients with NYHA class I-II heart failure, vernakalant showed increased efficacy but also higher AE rates.

Conclusions: Vernakalant showed comparable overall efficacy to amiodarone and flecainide for cardioversion of recent-onset AF, with faster SR conversion and shorter ED stays. However, given the retrospective design, non-random treatment allocation, and baseline differences between groups, these comparative findings should be interpreted with caution. Vernakalant may be a useful option in selected patients when rapid cardioversion is desired.

vernakalant, flecainide和胺碘酮治疗房颤转复的比较有效性和安全性:倾向评分匹配分析。
背景:Vernakalant已在欧洲、加拿大和几个亚洲国家被批准用于近期发作的房颤(AF)的药理学转复,但由于FDA的安全性问题,在美国仍未获得批准。其在急诊科(ED)房颤管理中的作用需要进一步与其他药物进行比较评估。方法:我们进行了一项回顾性观察研究,包括2012年1月至2022年12月期间在单个ED中静脉注射(iv)维那卡兰特、氟卡因胺或胺碘酮治疗的所有AF发作。临床资料从患者记录中提取。主要结果是在急诊科停留期间的窦性心律(SR)转换。次要结局包括到SR的时间、ED住院时间、房颤复发、ED再访、6个月内再住院,以及药物输注或ED住院期间发生的不良事件(ae)。应用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW)来调整基线混淆。亚组分析探讨了人口统计学和临床变量对治疗反应和安全性的影响。结果:我们分析了899次房颤发作(vernakalant: 262次;flecainide: 151次;胺碘酮:486次)。SR转化率分别为76.7% (vernakalant)、69.5% (flecainide)和67.3%(胺碘酮)。与胺碘奈(2.58 h)和胺碘奈(8 h)相比,vernakalant到SR的中位时间显著缩短(0.25 h); p结论:vernakalant与胺碘酮和胺碘奈在近期发作的房颤转复方面的总体疗效相当,SR转换更快,ED停留时间更短。然而,考虑到回顾性设计、非随机治疗分配和组间基线差异,这些比较结果应谨慎解释。在需要快速心律转复的特定患者中,维那卡兰特可能是一种有用的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书