Evaluating the clinical effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases using minimal clinically important difference: systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 7.5 3区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Yomna Elghanam, Eunyoung Kim
{"title":"Evaluating the clinical effects of GLP-1 receptor agonists for Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases using minimal clinically important difference: systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yomna Elghanam, Eunyoung Kim","doi":"10.1007/s12272-026-01615-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are promising candidates for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, their effects in non-diabetic populations, independent of metabolic confounding, remain unclear. We evaluated the effects of GLP-1RAs on cognition, clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and safety in non-diabetic individuals with PD, AD, and mild cognitive impairment. We assessed the clinical meaningfulness of these effects using minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to November 2025. A random-effects meta-analysis was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261277032). Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolling 1260 participants were included. GLP-1RAs showed a small statistically significant improvement in global cognition (SMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.27; I<sup>2</sup> = 7%), supported by high-certainty evidence. Despite statistical significance, findings suggest only a trivial probability (1%) of a clinically important benefit. Conversely, GLP-1RAs were associated with poorer verbal fluency (SMD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.79 to - 0.08; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%), supported by high-certainty evidence. For clinical severity, function, depression, and PD-related outcomes, pooled estimates generally favored GLP-1RAs, but none reached statistical significance. A significant between-disease subgroup difference was observed for function. In the PD subgroup, GLP-1RAs significantly improved depression symptoms relative to control (MD - 2.09, 95% CI - 3.99 to - 0.20; I<sup>2</sup> = 0%). Nevertheless, this magnitude of improvement remained below the threshold for clinically important benefit. Biomarker findings were inconsistent across trials. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced weight and were associated with poorer tolerability and increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Current evidence provides no convincing support for a clinically meaningful or disease-modifying effect of GLP-1RAs, and adverse effects may limit their clinical utility. Large-scale trials are needed to definitively weigh potential benefits against associated risks.</p>","PeriodicalId":8287,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Pharmacal Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Pharmacal Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12272-026-01615-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are promising candidates for Alzheimer's disease (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). However, their effects in non-diabetic populations, independent of metabolic confounding, remain unclear. We evaluated the effects of GLP-1RAs on cognition, clinical outcomes, biomarkers, and safety in non-diabetic individuals with PD, AD, and mild cognitive impairment. We assessed the clinical meaningfulness of these effects using minimal clinically important difference thresholds. Relevant studies were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to November 2025. A random-effects meta-analysis was applied to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs), mean differences (MDs), and risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420261277032). Fourteen randomized controlled trials enrolling 1260 participants were included. GLP-1RAs showed a small statistically significant improvement in global cognition (SMD 0.14, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.27; I2 = 7%), supported by high-certainty evidence. Despite statistical significance, findings suggest only a trivial probability (1%) of a clinically important benefit. Conversely, GLP-1RAs were associated with poorer verbal fluency (SMD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.79 to - 0.08; I2 = 0%), supported by high-certainty evidence. For clinical severity, function, depression, and PD-related outcomes, pooled estimates generally favored GLP-1RAs, but none reached statistical significance. A significant between-disease subgroup difference was observed for function. In the PD subgroup, GLP-1RAs significantly improved depression symptoms relative to control (MD - 2.09, 95% CI - 3.99 to - 0.20; I2 = 0%). Nevertheless, this magnitude of improvement remained below the threshold for clinically important benefit. Biomarker findings were inconsistent across trials. GLP-1RAs significantly reduced weight and were associated with poorer tolerability and increased gastrointestinal adverse events. Current evidence provides no convincing support for a clinically meaningful or disease-modifying effect of GLP-1RAs, and adverse effects may limit their clinical utility. Large-scale trials are needed to definitively weigh potential benefits against associated risks.

评估GLP-1受体激动剂对阿尔茨海默病和帕金森病的临床效果,使用最小临床重要差异:系统回顾和荟萃分析
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂(GLP-1RAs)是治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)和帕金森病(PD)的有希望的候选药物。然而,它们对非糖尿病人群的影响,独立于代谢混杂,仍然不清楚。我们评估了GLP-1RAs对患有PD、AD和轻度认知障碍的非糖尿病患者的认知、临床结局、生物标志物和安全性的影响。我们使用最小临床重要差异阈值评估这些影响的临床意义。相关研究检索自PubMed、Embase和Web of Science,检索时间从创立到2025年11月。采用随机效应荟萃分析计算标准化平均差异(SMDs)、平均差异(MDs)和95%置信区间(CIs)的风险比。该协议已在PROSPERO (CRD420261277032)中注册。纳入14项随机对照试验,纳入1260名受试者。GLP-1RAs在整体认知方面有统计学意义的小幅改善(SMD为0.14,95% CI为0.01至0.27;I2 = 7%),有高确定性证据支持。尽管有统计学意义,但研究结果表明,临床重要益处的概率很小(1%)。相反,GLP-1RAs与较差的语言流畅性相关(SMD - 0.43, 95% CI - 0.79至- 0.08;I2 = 0%),这得到了高确定性证据的支持。对于临床严重程度、功能、抑郁和pd相关结果,汇总估计普遍倾向于GLP-1RAs,但没有达到统计学意义。功能在疾病亚组间存在显著差异。在PD亚组中,与对照组相比,GLP-1RAs显著改善抑郁症状(MD - 2.09, 95% CI - 3.99至- 0.20;I2 = 0%)。然而,这一改善幅度仍低于临床重要益处的阈值。不同试验的生物标志物发现不一致。GLP-1RAs显著降低体重,并与较差的耐受性和增加的胃肠道不良事件相关。目前的证据不能令人信服地支持GLP-1RAs具有临床意义或疾病改善作用,而且不良反应可能限制其临床应用。需要大规模的试验来明确地权衡潜在的益处和相关的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
9.00%
发文量
48
审稿时长
3.3 months
期刊介绍: Archives of Pharmacal Research is the official journal of the Pharmaceutical Society of Korea and has been published since 1976. Archives of Pharmacal Research is an interdisciplinary journal devoted to the publication of original scientific research papers and reviews in the fields of drug discovery, drug development, and drug actions with a view to providing fundamental and novel information on drugs and drug candidates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书