Regional citrate anticoagulation for renal replacement therapy during venovenous ECMO: A randomized crossover pilot study.

IF 5.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Annals of Intensive Care Pub Date : 2026-04-27 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100072
Marco Giani, Marta Frazzei, Roberto Rona, Thomas Langer, Matteo Pozzi, Giuseppe Foti, Emanuele Rezoagli
{"title":"Regional citrate anticoagulation for renal replacement therapy during venovenous ECMO: A randomized crossover pilot study.","authors":"Marco Giani, Marta Frazzei, Roberto Rona, Thomas Langer, Matteo Pozzi, Giuseppe Foti, Emanuele Rezoagli","doi":"10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is suggested as the preferred anticoagulation strategy during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), as it prolongs circuit lifespan while minimizing bleeding complications. However, evidence on its use in CRRT circuits during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is limited. In patients receiving ECMO, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is routinely administered to maintain circuit patency and is often relied upon to anticoagulate the CRRT circuit, limiting the use of regional citrate anticoagulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether adding regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) to systemic unfractionated heparin (UFH) reduces CRRT circuits clotting in patients undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients were randomized to receive alternating CRRT circuits anticoagulated with either systemic UFH alone or regional citrate anticoagulation added to systemic UFH (RCA + UFH), according to a predefined crossover sequence. Each circuit was maintained for up to 72 h or until clotting occurred. Coagulation parameters, CRRT pressures, and thromboelastography (TEG) data were collected.A total of 66 CRRT circuits from 18 patients were analyzed (33 RCA + UFH; 33 UFH). No clotting events occurred in the RCA + UFH circuits, whereas 6 events were observed with UFH alone (0% vs 19%; <i>p</i> < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed significantly longer circuit survival with RCA + UFH compared to UFH alone (p = 0.029). Platelet counts increased during RCA + UFH but declined during UFH alone (median change +6 vs -7 ×10³/μL; <i>p</i> < 0.001), with a significantly more favorable overall trend under RCA + UFH (effect estimate +13 × 10³/μL, 95% CI 8-19). D-dimer levels increased significantly during UFH alone, whereas a lower increase was observed with RCA + UFH (effect estimate -782 μg/L, 95% CI -1525 to -39).Thromboelastography performed at the circuit level showed significantly prolonged R-times with RCA + UFH compared with UFH alone (median R-time 90 <i>vs.</i> 30 min; <i>p</i> < 0.001). No clinically relevant RCA-related metabolic complications were observed, including no episodes of severe hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis, or citrate accumulation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients undergoing VV ECMO, adding regional citrate anticoagulation to systemic unfractionated heparin reduced CRRT circuit clotting, prevented platelet consumption. This technique was feasible, safe, and may improve CRRT efficiency in this high-risk population.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05148026.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"16 ","pages":"100072"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aicoj.2026.100072","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) is suggested as the preferred anticoagulation strategy during continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), as it prolongs circuit lifespan while minimizing bleeding complications. However, evidence on its use in CRRT circuits during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is limited. In patients receiving ECMO, systemic anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH) is routinely administered to maintain circuit patency and is often relied upon to anticoagulate the CRRT circuit, limiting the use of regional citrate anticoagulation. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether adding regional citrate anticoagulation (RCA) to systemic unfractionated heparin (UFH) reduces CRRT circuits clotting in patients undergoing venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO).

Results: Patients were randomized to receive alternating CRRT circuits anticoagulated with either systemic UFH alone or regional citrate anticoagulation added to systemic UFH (RCA + UFH), according to a predefined crossover sequence. Each circuit was maintained for up to 72 h or until clotting occurred. Coagulation parameters, CRRT pressures, and thromboelastography (TEG) data were collected.A total of 66 CRRT circuits from 18 patients were analyzed (33 RCA + UFH; 33 UFH). No clotting events occurred in the RCA + UFH circuits, whereas 6 events were observed with UFH alone (0% vs 19%; p < 0.001). Cox proportional hazards analysis showed significantly longer circuit survival with RCA + UFH compared to UFH alone (p = 0.029). Platelet counts increased during RCA + UFH but declined during UFH alone (median change +6 vs -7 ×10³/μL; p < 0.001), with a significantly more favorable overall trend under RCA + UFH (effect estimate +13 × 10³/μL, 95% CI 8-19). D-dimer levels increased significantly during UFH alone, whereas a lower increase was observed with RCA + UFH (effect estimate -782 μg/L, 95% CI -1525 to -39).Thromboelastography performed at the circuit level showed significantly prolonged R-times with RCA + UFH compared with UFH alone (median R-time 90 vs. 30 min; p < 0.001). No clinically relevant RCA-related metabolic complications were observed, including no episodes of severe hypernatremia, metabolic alkalosis, or citrate accumulation.

Conclusions: In patients undergoing VV ECMO, adding regional citrate anticoagulation to systemic unfractionated heparin reduced CRRT circuit clotting, prevented platelet consumption. This technique was feasible, safe, and may improve CRRT efficiency in this high-risk population.

Clinical trial: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT05148026.

静脉-静脉ECMO期间局部柠檬酸抗凝肾替代治疗:一项随机交叉先导研究。
背景:局部柠檬酸抗凝(RCA)被认为是持续肾替代治疗(CRRT)首选的抗凝策略,因为它延长了肾循环的寿命,同时减少了出血并发症。然而,它在体外膜氧合(ECMO)期间CRRT回路中的应用证据有限。在接受ECMO的患者中,常规给予全身抗凝与未分离肝素(UFH)以维持回路通畅,并且通常依赖于抗凝CRRT回路,限制了局部柠檬酸盐抗凝的使用。本研究的目的是评估在接受静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV ECMO)的患者中,在全身不分级肝素(UFH)中加入局部柠檬酸盐抗凝(RCA)是否能减少CRRT回路的凝血。结果:患者随机接受CRRT循环抗凝治疗,根据预先设定的交叉顺序,要么单独接受全身性UFH,要么接受局部枸橼酸抗凝治疗加入全身性UFH (RCA + UFH)。每个回路维持72小时或直到发生凝血。收集凝血参数、CRRT压力和血栓弹性成像(TEG)数据。共分析了来自18例患者的66个CRRT回路(33个RCA + UFH; 33个UFH)。RCA + UFH回路未发生凝血事件,而单独UFH回路发生6起凝血事件(0% vs 19%; p < 0.001)。Cox比例风险分析显示,与单独使用UFH相比,RCA + UFH的回路生存期显著延长(p = 0.029)。血小板计数在RCA + UFH期间增加,而在单独UFH期间下降(中位数变化+6 vs -7 ×10³/μL; p < 0.001), RCA + UFH的总体趋势明显更有利(效应估计+13 ×10³/μL, 95% CI 8-19)。d -二聚体水平在单独使用UFH时显著增加,而RCA + UFH的增加较低(效应估计为-782 μg/L, 95% CI为-1525至-39)。在血流水平上进行的血栓弹性成像显示,与单独使用UFH相比,RCA + UFH的R-time显著延长(中位R-time 90 vs. 30 min; p < 0.001)。未观察到临床相关的rca相关代谢并发症,包括未发生严重高钠血症、代谢性碱中毒或柠檬酸盐积累。结论:在接受VV ECMO的患者中,在全身未分级肝素的基础上加入局部柠檬酸盐抗凝可减少CRRT循环凝血,防止血小板消耗。这项技术是可行的,安全的,并可能提高在这一高危人群的CRRT效率。临床试验:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT05148026。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书