Analysis of Voiding Impairment Following Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Do Alpha-Blockers Reduce the Risk?

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Yi Zheng, Dong Ye, Zhenghao Chen, Zhenan Zhang, Huifeng Wu
{"title":"Analysis of Voiding Impairment Following Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Do Alpha-Blockers Reduce the Risk?","authors":"Yi Zheng, Dong Ye, Zhenghao Chen, Zhenan Zhang, Huifeng Wu","doi":"10.1111/ans.70711","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds: </strong>To identify predictors of voiding impairment following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) and evaluate the effect of alpha-blocker pretreatment: METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between June 2022 and May 2024, enrolling 279 patients undergoing TPPB. Patients were stratified into four groups according to the duration of alpha-blocker pretreatment. Baseline characteristics and voiding parameters were collected, including the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life, maximal flow rate (Q<sub>max</sub>), and post-void residual urine. Follow-up assessments were performed at 7 and 30 days post-biopsy. The rate of voiding impairment and post-biopsy voiding parameters were compared across groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of post-biopsy voiding impairment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline characteristics were comparable among all groups. At 7 days post-biopsy, patients with alpha-blocker pretreatment duration of < 12 months exhibited a lower voiding impairment rate, lower IPSS scores, and higher Q<sub>max</sub> compared with patients without alpha-blocker pretreatment (p < 0.05). In contrast, patients with alpha-blocker pretreatment duration of > 12 months showed no differences in voiding impairment rate or voiding parameters compared to those without alpha-blocker pretreatment (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that diabetes mellitus (DM) was independently associated with post-biopsy voiding impairment, whereas alpha-blocker pretreatment for < 12 months exerted a protective effect (p < 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>TPPB is associated with voiding impairment. DM may serve as a predictor of post-biopsy voiding impairment, while alpha-blocker pretreatment for < 12 months may play a protective role.</p>","PeriodicalId":8158,"journal":{"name":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ANZ Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.70711","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds: To identify predictors of voiding impairment following transperineal prostate biopsy (TPPB) and evaluate the effect of alpha-blocker pretreatment: METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted between June 2022 and May 2024, enrolling 279 patients undergoing TPPB. Patients were stratified into four groups according to the duration of alpha-blocker pretreatment. Baseline characteristics and voiding parameters were collected, including the international prostate symptom score (IPSS), quality of life, maximal flow rate (Qmax), and post-void residual urine. Follow-up assessments were performed at 7 and 30 days post-biopsy. The rate of voiding impairment and post-biopsy voiding parameters were compared across groups. Logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify independent predictors of post-biopsy voiding impairment.

Results: Baseline characteristics were comparable among all groups. At 7 days post-biopsy, patients with alpha-blocker pretreatment duration of < 12 months exhibited a lower voiding impairment rate, lower IPSS scores, and higher Qmax compared with patients without alpha-blocker pretreatment (p < 0.05). In contrast, patients with alpha-blocker pretreatment duration of > 12 months showed no differences in voiding impairment rate or voiding parameters compared to those without alpha-blocker pretreatment (p > 0.05). Logistic regression analyses demonstrated that diabetes mellitus (DM) was independently associated with post-biopsy voiding impairment, whereas alpha-blocker pretreatment for < 12 months exerted a protective effect (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: TPPB is associated with voiding impairment. DM may serve as a predictor of post-biopsy voiding impairment, while alpha-blocker pretreatment for < 12 months may play a protective role.

经会阴前列腺活检后排尿障碍分析:α -受体阻滞剂能降低风险吗?
背景:为了确定经会阴前列腺活检(TPPB)后排尿障碍的预测因素,并评估α受体阻滞剂预处理的效果:方法:在2022年6月至2024年5月期间进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,招募了279名接受TPPB的患者。根据阻断剂预处理时间的长短,将患者分为四组。收集基线特征和排尿参数,包括国际前列腺症状评分(IPSS)、生活质量、最大尿流量(Qmax)和排尿后残留尿。在活检后7天和30天进行随访评估。比较各组患者的排尿障碍率和活检后排尿参数。进行逻辑回归分析以确定活检后排尿障碍的独立预测因素。结果:各组间基线特征具有可比性。活检后7天,经α -受体阻滞剂预处理的患者与未经α -受体阻滞剂预处理的患者相比,排尿障碍率和排尿参数在12个月时无差异(p < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,糖尿病(DM)与活检后排尿障碍独立相关,而α -受体阻滞剂预处理与TPPB的排尿障碍相关。糖尿病可以作为活检后排尿障碍的预测因子,而α -受体阻滞剂预处理
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
ANZ Journal of Surgery
ANZ Journal of Surgery 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
11.80%
发文量
720
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: ANZ Journal of Surgery is published by Wiley on behalf of the Royal Australasian College of Surgeons to provide a medium for the publication of peer-reviewed original contributions related to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of surgery and related disciplines. It also provides a programme of continuing education for surgeons. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书