The effect of geopolitical risks from the Russian Federation and the Middle East on carbon and energy inequalities in Europe

IF 5.1 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Energy, Sustainability and Society Pub Date : 2026-05-02 Epub Date: 2026-05-07 DOI:10.1186/s13705-026-00582-y
Sakine Owjimehr, Mehdi Emami Meybodi, Zeinab Yadegar
{"title":"The effect of geopolitical risks from the Russian Federation and the Middle East on carbon and energy inequalities in Europe","authors":"Sakine Owjimehr,&nbsp;Mehdi Emami Meybodi,&nbsp;Zeinab Yadegar","doi":"10.1186/s13705-026-00582-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, geopolitical events have had a significant impact on global energy markets, particularly on oil prices. The Russian Federation and Middle Eastern countries are major energy producers, and when tensions rise in these regions, it has a worldwide impact on energy systems. European countries are heavily reliant on energy imports from these regions, making them particularly vulnerable to geopolitical risks. The study poses a key question: do geopolitical risks not only disrupt energy markets, but also exacerbate energy and carbon inequalities between countries? There are significant differences in energy access and carbon emissions across European nations, alongside ongoing political tensions involving the Russian Federation and the Middle East. This combination forms the foundation of our research. We employed statistical models known as Mean Group and Pooled Mean Group, utilizing an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag framework, to analyze the impact of political risks on these two forms of inequality. Our analysis covers 30 years of data, from 1993 to 2022, allowing us to capture major political events and see how they impact Europe’s energy situation.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Geopolitical risks from the Russian Federation and the Middle East have a stronger influence on energy and carbon inequalities than global geopolitical risks. Furthermore, geopolitical threats—capturing risk-related tensions such as war, military buildup, and nuclear risks—have a stronger and more persistent impact on European energy inequality than geopolitical acts, which reflect realized events such as conflicts and terrorism. The consumption of renewable energy has been shown to have different effects over time: it helps to reduce energy inequality in the short term, but contributes to increased inequality in the long term. Carbon and energy inequality respond in a similar way to the research variables.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While renewable energy consumption has been shown to reduce inequality in the short term, disparities in infrastructure across European countries have been identified as a key driver of long-term inequality. Consequently, European countries should expand the development of renewable energy as a short-term geopolitical risk mitigation strategy while simultaneously investing in infrastructure harmonization.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":539,"journal":{"name":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s13705-026-00582-y.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy, Sustainability and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s13705-026-00582-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Since the beginning of the twenty-first century, geopolitical events have had a significant impact on global energy markets, particularly on oil prices. The Russian Federation and Middle Eastern countries are major energy producers, and when tensions rise in these regions, it has a worldwide impact on energy systems. European countries are heavily reliant on energy imports from these regions, making them particularly vulnerable to geopolitical risks. The study poses a key question: do geopolitical risks not only disrupt energy markets, but also exacerbate energy and carbon inequalities between countries? There are significant differences in energy access and carbon emissions across European nations, alongside ongoing political tensions involving the Russian Federation and the Middle East. This combination forms the foundation of our research. We employed statistical models known as Mean Group and Pooled Mean Group, utilizing an Auto Regressive Distributed Lag framework, to analyze the impact of political risks on these two forms of inequality. Our analysis covers 30 years of data, from 1993 to 2022, allowing us to capture major political events and see how they impact Europe’s energy situation.

Results

Geopolitical risks from the Russian Federation and the Middle East have a stronger influence on energy and carbon inequalities than global geopolitical risks. Furthermore, geopolitical threats—capturing risk-related tensions such as war, military buildup, and nuclear risks—have a stronger and more persistent impact on European energy inequality than geopolitical acts, which reflect realized events such as conflicts and terrorism. The consumption of renewable energy has been shown to have different effects over time: it helps to reduce energy inequality in the short term, but contributes to increased inequality in the long term. Carbon and energy inequality respond in a similar way to the research variables.

Conclusions

While renewable energy consumption has been shown to reduce inequality in the short term, disparities in infrastructure across European countries have been identified as a key driver of long-term inequality. Consequently, European countries should expand the development of renewable energy as a short-term geopolitical risk mitigation strategy while simultaneously investing in infrastructure harmonization.

来自俄罗斯联邦和中东的地缘政治风险对欧洲碳和能源不平等的影响
自21世纪初以来,地缘政治事件对全球能源市场,特别是对油价产生了重大影响。俄罗斯联邦和中东国家是主要的能源生产国,当这些地区的紧张局势加剧时,它会对全球能源系统产生影响。欧洲国家严重依赖从这些地区进口能源,因此特别容易受到地缘政治风险的影响。这项研究提出了一个关键问题:地缘政治风险是否不仅扰乱了能源市场,还加剧了国家之间的能源和碳不平等?欧洲各国在能源获取和碳排放方面存在显著差异,同时涉及俄罗斯联邦和中东的政治紧张局势也在持续。这种结合构成了我们研究的基础。我们采用均值组和汇总均值组的统计模型,利用自动回归分布滞后框架来分析政治风险对这两种不平等形式的影响。我们的分析涵盖了从1993年到2022年的30年数据,使我们能够捕捉到重大政治事件,并了解它们如何影响欧洲的能源形势。结果俄罗斯联邦和中东地缘政治风险对能源和碳不平等的影响大于全球地缘政治风险。此外,地缘政治威胁——捕获风险相关的紧张局势,如战争、军事集结和核风险——对欧洲能源不平等的影响比地缘政治行为更强、更持久,地缘政治行为反映了冲突和恐怖主义等已实现的事件。随着时间的推移,可再生能源的消费已被证明具有不同的影响:它有助于在短期内减少能源不平等,但从长期来看,它会加剧不平等。碳和能源不平等以类似的方式响应研究变量。虽然可再生能源消费已被证明可以在短期内减少不平等,但欧洲各国基础设施的差异已被确定为长期不平等的关键驱动因素。因此,欧洲国家应扩大可再生能源的发展,将其作为短期地缘政治风险缓解战略,同时投资于基础设施协调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Energy, Sustainability and Society
Energy, Sustainability and Society Energy-Energy Engineering and Power Technology
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
4.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Energy, Sustainability and Society is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the brand SpringerOpen. It covers topics ranging from scientific research to innovative approaches for technology implementation to analysis of economic, social and environmental impacts of sustainable energy systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书