VeriTrace: A Multitask Disaster Dataset for Real–Fake Verification and Source Tracing

IF 2.6 Q2 ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC
IEEE open journal of signal processing Pub Date : 2026-01-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1109/OJSP.2026.3684389
Surbhi Madan;Yusuke Yasuda;Junichi Yamagishi
{"title":"VeriTrace: A Multitask Disaster Dataset for Real–Fake Verification and Source Tracing","authors":"Surbhi Madan;Yusuke Yasuda;Junichi Yamagishi","doi":"10.1109/OJSP.2026.3684389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The rapid increase in AI-generated images is affecting not only face-focused domains like face swapping and media manipulation but also non-facial content such as scenes and objects. Yet, one crucial area that remains underexplored is disaster deepfakes. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires occur unpredictably, and the widespread use of social media has amplified the circulation of fake disaster images that can mislead the public about the severity and consequences of these events. Detecting whether a disaster image is real or AI-generated is challenging due to the semantic complexity of disaster scenes, the scarcity of labeled data, and the difficulty of identifying images produced by previously unseen generative models. We argue that the limited diversity of existing training data is a key barrier to building robust detection systems. To address this, we introduce VeriTrace, a large-scale, in-the-wild multitask dataset curated via a CLIP-based pipeline containing AI-generated disaster images from 3,191 generative models. VeriTrace supports both deepfake detection and source tracing. Our benchmarks confirm that disaster-domain deepfakes are significantly harder to detect than human-domain. Furthermore, we identify an identification-attribution gap: while high-fidelity commercial images frequently evade standard detectors, they possess distinct architectural “fingerprints” that make them highly susceptible to source tracing. VeriTrace and its associated code will be released upon acceptance.","PeriodicalId":73300,"journal":{"name":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","volume":"7 ","pages":"438-446"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=11481973","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE open journal of signal processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11481973/","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ELECTRICAL & ELECTRONIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rapid increase in AI-generated images is affecting not only face-focused domains like face swapping and media manipulation but also non-facial content such as scenes and objects. Yet, one crucial area that remains underexplored is disaster deepfakes. Natural disasters such as earthquakes, floods, and wildfires occur unpredictably, and the widespread use of social media has amplified the circulation of fake disaster images that can mislead the public about the severity and consequences of these events. Detecting whether a disaster image is real or AI-generated is challenging due to the semantic complexity of disaster scenes, the scarcity of labeled data, and the difficulty of identifying images produced by previously unseen generative models. We argue that the limited diversity of existing training data is a key barrier to building robust detection systems. To address this, we introduce VeriTrace, a large-scale, in-the-wild multitask dataset curated via a CLIP-based pipeline containing AI-generated disaster images from 3,191 generative models. VeriTrace supports both deepfake detection and source tracing. Our benchmarks confirm that disaster-domain deepfakes are significantly harder to detect than human-domain. Furthermore, we identify an identification-attribution gap: while high-fidelity commercial images frequently evade standard detectors, they possess distinct architectural “fingerprints” that make them highly susceptible to source tracing. VeriTrace and its associated code will be released upon acceptance.
VeriTrace:用于真假验证和源跟踪的多任务灾难数据集
人工智能生成图像的快速增长不仅影响了人脸交换和媒体操纵等以人脸为中心的领域,还影响了场景和物体等非人脸内容。然而,一个仍未被充分开发的关键领域是灾难深度采集。地震、洪水和野火等自然灾害的发生是不可预测的,社交媒体的广泛使用扩大了虚假灾难图像的传播,这些图像可能会误导公众对这些事件的严重性和后果的认识。由于灾难场景的语义复杂性、标记数据的稀缺性以及识别以前未见过的生成模型生成的图像的难度,检测灾难图像是真实的还是人工智能生成的具有挑战性。我们认为,现有训练数据的有限多样性是构建鲁棒检测系统的关键障碍。为了解决这个问题,我们引入了VeriTrace,这是一个大规模的野外多任务数据集,通过基于clip的管道管理,其中包含来自3191个生成模型的人工智能生成的灾难图像。VeriTrace支持深度伪造检测和源跟踪。我们的基准测试证实,灾难领域的深度造假比人类领域的深度造假更难检测。此外,我们还发现了一个识别-归属差距:虽然高保真商业图像经常逃避标准检测器,但它们具有独特的架构“指纹”,这使得它们非常容易受到源跟踪的影响。VeriTrace及其相关代码将在验收后发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书