Inhibition performance and mechanisms of methane hydrate inhibitors in oil and gas pipelines

IF 5 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Natural Gas Industry B Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-22 DOI:10.1016/j.ngib.2026.03.003
Jie Wang , Yong Cheng , Yuan Li , Pan Ma , Hualei Xu , Houshun Jiang
{"title":"Inhibition performance and mechanisms of methane hydrate inhibitors in oil and gas pipelines","authors":"Jie Wang ,&nbsp;Yong Cheng ,&nbsp;Yuan Li ,&nbsp;Pan Ma ,&nbsp;Hualei Xu ,&nbsp;Houshun Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.ngib.2026.03.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>During winter natural gas transportation, hydrate formation under low-temperature and high-pressure conditions frequently results in pipeline blockage and severe low assurance challenges. Although conventional thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors (THIs) are effective in shifting hydrate phase equilibrium, the application is constrained by high volumetric injection requirements and the associated operational costs, thereby driving research interest toward low-dosage hydrate inhibitors (LDHIs). This study integrates high-pressure pipeline flow simulations with molecular dynamics simulations to systematically evaluate the inhibition performance and elucidate the molecular-scale mechanisms of representative inhibitor classes in methane hydrates. Pipeline simulation results indicate that, at low additive concentrations: (1) the inhibition effectiveness of cations follows the order Al<sup>3+</sup> &gt; Fe<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Ca<sup>2+</sup> &gt; Na<sup>+</sup>, suggesting a strong dependence on ionic charge density; (2) at identical mass fraction, methanol exhibits greater thermodynamic inhibition performance than ethylene glycol. Notably, 5.0 wt% ethylene glycol accelerates hydrate formation kinetics, exhibiting an anomalous promotion effect. For kinetic inhibitors and their blends, the following observations were obtained: (3) PVP K30 exhibited optimal inhibition performance at 1.0 wt%, significantly extending the hydrate induction time; moreover, the combination of 1.0 wt% PVP K30 with 5.0 wt% methanol completely suppressed hydrate formation under the tested conditions while substantially reducing the required alcohol dosage; (4) molecular-scale analysis indicates that methanol and ethylene glycol primarily act by shifting the hydrate phase equilibrium and perturbing the hydrogen-bond network of water. In contrast, PVP K30 inhibits hydrate formation by disrupting hydrogen-bond structures and decreasing methane–water association through steric hindrance and interfacial adsorption. The blended system exhibits a clear synergistic effect between thermodynamic and kinetic inhibition, combining a phase equilibrium shift with delayed hydrate formation kinetics. This THI-focused investigation systematically clarifies the inhibition of mechanisms of representative additives and provides a scientific basis for selecting cost-effective LDHIs strategies for hydrate control in oil and gas pipelines, with direct relevance to mitigating hydrate blockage in field operations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":37116,"journal":{"name":"Natural Gas Industry B","volume":"13 2","pages":"Pages 239-255"},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Gas Industry B","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352854026000173","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During winter natural gas transportation, hydrate formation under low-temperature and high-pressure conditions frequently results in pipeline blockage and severe low assurance challenges. Although conventional thermodynamic hydrate inhibitors (THIs) are effective in shifting hydrate phase equilibrium, the application is constrained by high volumetric injection requirements and the associated operational costs, thereby driving research interest toward low-dosage hydrate inhibitors (LDHIs). This study integrates high-pressure pipeline flow simulations with molecular dynamics simulations to systematically evaluate the inhibition performance and elucidate the molecular-scale mechanisms of representative inhibitor classes in methane hydrates. Pipeline simulation results indicate that, at low additive concentrations: (1) the inhibition effectiveness of cations follows the order Al3+ > Fe2+ > Ca2+ > Na+, suggesting a strong dependence on ionic charge density; (2) at identical mass fraction, methanol exhibits greater thermodynamic inhibition performance than ethylene glycol. Notably, 5.0 wt% ethylene glycol accelerates hydrate formation kinetics, exhibiting an anomalous promotion effect. For kinetic inhibitors and their blends, the following observations were obtained: (3) PVP K30 exhibited optimal inhibition performance at 1.0 wt%, significantly extending the hydrate induction time; moreover, the combination of 1.0 wt% PVP K30 with 5.0 wt% methanol completely suppressed hydrate formation under the tested conditions while substantially reducing the required alcohol dosage; (4) molecular-scale analysis indicates that methanol and ethylene glycol primarily act by shifting the hydrate phase equilibrium and perturbing the hydrogen-bond network of water. In contrast, PVP K30 inhibits hydrate formation by disrupting hydrogen-bond structures and decreasing methane–water association through steric hindrance and interfacial adsorption. The blended system exhibits a clear synergistic effect between thermodynamic and kinetic inhibition, combining a phase equilibrium shift with delayed hydrate formation kinetics. This THI-focused investigation systematically clarifies the inhibition of mechanisms of representative additives and provides a scientific basis for selecting cost-effective LDHIs strategies for hydrate control in oil and gas pipelines, with direct relevance to mitigating hydrate blockage in field operations.
甲烷水合物抑制剂在油气管道中的缓蚀性能及机理
在冬季天然气输送过程中,低温高压条件下水合物的形成经常导致管道堵塞和严重的低保障挑战。尽管传统的热力学水合物抑制剂(THIs)在改变水合物相平衡方面是有效的,但其应用受到高体积注入要求和相关操作成本的限制,因此推动了对低剂量水合物抑制剂(LDHIs)的研究兴趣。本研究将高压管道流动模拟与分子动力学模拟相结合,系统评价了甲烷水合物中具有代表性的缓蚀剂类型的缓蚀性能,并阐明了其分子尺度机理。管道模拟结果表明,在低添加剂浓度下:(1)阳离子的抑制效果依次为Al3+ >; Fe2+ > Ca2+ > Na+,与离子电荷密度有较强的依赖性;(2)在相同质量分数下,甲醇表现出比乙二醇更强的热力学抑制性能。值得注意的是,5.0 wt%的乙二醇加速水合物形成动力学,表现出异常的促进作用。对于动力学抑制剂及其共混物,(3)PVP K30在1.0 wt%时表现出最佳的抑制效果,显著延长了水合物诱导时间;此外,1.0 wt% PVP K30与5.0 wt%甲醇的组合在测试条件下完全抑制了水合物的形成,同时大大降低了所需的酒精用量;(4)分子尺度分析表明,甲醇和乙二醇主要通过改变水合物相平衡和扰乱水的氢键网络来起作用。相反,PVP K30通过空间位阻和界面吸附破坏氢键结构,减少甲烷-水结合,从而抑制水合物的形成。混合体系在热力学和动力学抑制之间表现出明显的协同效应,结合了相平衡转移和延迟水合物形成动力学。这项以thi为重点的研究系统地阐明了代表性添加剂的抑制机制,为选择具有成本效益的LDHIs策略来控制油气管道中的水合物提供了科学依据,与减轻油田作业中的水合物堵塞直接相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Natural Gas Industry B
Natural Gas Industry B Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geology
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
6.10%
发文量
46
审稿时长
79 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书