Value-based outsourcing is associated with better environmental and economic sustainability metrics while maintaining patient safety: a comparative analysis of electricity use, water use, and prescription costs in public hospitals of Madrid (Spain).

IF 2.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Frontiers in health services Pub Date : 2026-04-15 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frhs.2026.1762450
Marta Del Olmo Rodríguez, Bernadette Pfang, Ángel Blanco Rubio, David Romera, Ruben Horcajo, Javier Becares, Javier Arcos, Juan Antonio Álvaro de la Parra, Jorge Short Apellaniz
{"title":"Value-based outsourcing is associated with better environmental and economic sustainability metrics while maintaining patient safety: a comparative analysis of electricity use, water use, and prescription costs in public hospitals of Madrid (Spain).","authors":"Marta Del Olmo Rodríguez, Bernadette Pfang, Ángel Blanco Rubio, David Romera, Ruben Horcajo, Javier Becares, Javier Arcos, Juan Antonio Álvaro de la Parra, Jorge Short Apellaniz","doi":"10.3389/frhs.2026.1762450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Healthcare systems face growing pressure to maintain high-quality care while improving environmental and economic sustainability. Hospitals are resource-intensive institutions, contributing substantially to energy and water consumption, pharmaceutical expenditure, and healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions. Value-based healthcare models, including value-based outsourcing of publicly funded hospitals to private networks, have shown promise in improving quality and efficiency. However, their impact on sustainability outcomes remains underexplored. This study compared environmental and economic sustainability indicators between value-based outsourced and publicly managed hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study using five years of administrative data (2019-2023) from 26 public hospitals in the Madrid Regional Healthcare Service, Spain. Four hospitals were managed by a value-based private network, and 22 were publicly managed. Outcomes included electricity consumption (kWh/m<sup>2</sup> per hospital stay), water consumption (m<sup>3</sup> per hospital stay), and mean unit cost of specialist-prescribed medications. Analyses were stratified by hospital complexity (low, medium, high) and adjusted for case-mix complexity and year of construction. Patient safety indicators (medical and surgical complications and hospital-acquired infections) were also compared. Statistical analyses used chi-squared, Student's <i>t</i>-test, or Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> tests, with <i>p</i> < 0.05 considered significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Outsourced hospitals treated patients with significantly higher overall case-mix complexity than publicly managed hospitals. Overall electricity consumption was lower in outsourced hospitals (0.009 vs. 0.011 kWh/m<sup>2</sup> per hospital stay; <i>p</i> = 0.039), leading to estimated cost savings of 1,648,305 € and an approximate reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 8,672 CO2 metric tons during the study period, as was water consumption (0.65 vs. 0.81 m<sup>3</sup> per hospital stay; <i>p</i> < 0.001). The mean unit cost per medication was also lower in outsourced hospitals (€21.45 vs. €22.92; <i>p</i> = 0.026), with significant differences primarily in medium-complexity hospitals. Outsourced hospitals demonstrated slightly but significantly lower rates of inpatient complications and hospital-acquired infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Value-based outsourcing in Madrid's public hospitals was associated with improved environmental and economic sustainability, alongside favorable patient safety outcomes, despite higher case-mix complexity. These findings support incorporating sustainability indicators into performance-based healthcare models and suggest value-based outsourcing as a potential strategy to advance sustainable healthcare delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":73088,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in health services","volume":"6 ","pages":"1762450"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125028/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in health services","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2026.1762450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Healthcare systems face growing pressure to maintain high-quality care while improving environmental and economic sustainability. Hospitals are resource-intensive institutions, contributing substantially to energy and water consumption, pharmaceutical expenditure, and healthcare-related greenhouse gas emissions. Value-based healthcare models, including value-based outsourcing of publicly funded hospitals to private networks, have shown promise in improving quality and efficiency. However, their impact on sustainability outcomes remains underexplored. This study compared environmental and economic sustainability indicators between value-based outsourced and publicly managed hospitals.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional comparative study using five years of administrative data (2019-2023) from 26 public hospitals in the Madrid Regional Healthcare Service, Spain. Four hospitals were managed by a value-based private network, and 22 were publicly managed. Outcomes included electricity consumption (kWh/m2 per hospital stay), water consumption (m3 per hospital stay), and mean unit cost of specialist-prescribed medications. Analyses were stratified by hospital complexity (low, medium, high) and adjusted for case-mix complexity and year of construction. Patient safety indicators (medical and surgical complications and hospital-acquired infections) were also compared. Statistical analyses used chi-squared, Student's t-test, or Mann-Whitney U tests, with p < 0.05 considered significant.

Results: Outsourced hospitals treated patients with significantly higher overall case-mix complexity than publicly managed hospitals. Overall electricity consumption was lower in outsourced hospitals (0.009 vs. 0.011 kWh/m2 per hospital stay; p = 0.039), leading to estimated cost savings of 1,648,305 € and an approximate reduction in greenhouse gas emissions of 8,672 CO2 metric tons during the study period, as was water consumption (0.65 vs. 0.81 m3 per hospital stay; p < 0.001). The mean unit cost per medication was also lower in outsourced hospitals (€21.45 vs. €22.92; p = 0.026), with significant differences primarily in medium-complexity hospitals. Outsourced hospitals demonstrated slightly but significantly lower rates of inpatient complications and hospital-acquired infections.

Conclusions: Value-based outsourcing in Madrid's public hospitals was associated with improved environmental and economic sustainability, alongside favorable patient safety outcomes, despite higher case-mix complexity. These findings support incorporating sustainability indicators into performance-based healthcare models and suggest value-based outsourcing as a potential strategy to advance sustainable healthcare delivery.

基于价值的外包与更好的环境和经济可持续性指标相关,同时保持患者安全:马德里(西班牙)公立医院用电、用水和处方费用的比较分析。
背景:在提高环境和经济可持续性的同时,卫生保健系统面临着越来越大的压力,需要保持高质量的护理。医院是资源密集型机构,在能源和水资源消耗、医药支出以及与医疗保健相关的温室气体排放方面贡献巨大。以价值为基础的医疗保健模式,包括将公立医院以价值为基础的外包给私人网络,已显示出提高质量和效率的希望。然而,它们对可持续性成果的影响仍未得到充分探讨。本研究比较了基于价值的外包医院和公立医院之间的环境和经济可持续性指标。方法:我们利用西班牙马德里地区卫生服务中心26家公立医院5年(2019-2023年)的行政数据进行了横断面比较研究。4家医院由基于价值的私人网络管理,22家医院由公共管理。结果包括电力消耗(每次住院时kWh/m2)、水消耗(每次住院时m3)和专家处方药物的平均单位成本。根据医院复杂程度(低、中、高)对分析进行分层,并根据病例组合复杂程度和建设年份进行调整。患者安全指标(医疗和手术并发症以及医院获得性感染)也进行了比较。统计分析使用卡方检验、学生t检验或曼-惠特尼U检验,结果:外包医院治疗的患者总体病例组合复杂性明显高于公立管理的医院。外包医院的总用电量较低(每次住院时间为0.009比0.011千瓦时/平方米;p = 0.039),在研究期间估计可节省成本1,648,305欧元,温室气体排放量约减少8,672二氧化碳公吨,用水量也较低(每次住院时间为0.65比0.81立方米;p = 0.026),主要在中等复杂程度的医院存在显著差异。外包医院显示住院并发症和医院获得性感染的发生率略低,但明显较低。结论:马德里公立医院以价值为基础的外包与环境和经济可持续性的改善以及有利的患者安全结果相关,尽管病例组合复杂性较高。这些发现支持将可持续性指标纳入基于绩效的医疗保健模式,并建议将基于价值的外包作为推进可持续医疗保健服务的潜在战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书