Tear down the wall: why requiring the FDA and the PTO to share information will improve the decision-making of both agencies.

IF 2.4 2区 哲学 Q1 ETHICS
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Pub Date : 2026-04-30 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1093/jlb/lsag007
Robin Feldman, Gideon Schor
{"title":"Tear down the wall: why requiring the FDA and the PTO to share information will improve the decision-making of both agencies.","authors":"Robin Feldman, Gideon Schor","doi":"10.1093/jlb/lsag007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An invisible wall separates the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). This wall blocks inter-agency communication, depriving the PTO of information relevant to patent applications and depriving the FDA of information relevant to drug-approval applications. Consequently, it is too easy for a drug company to tell the PTO 'our drug is new' (in hopes of speeding a patent grant) while telling the FDA 'our drug is not new' (in hopes of speeding drug approval). Better communication between the FDA and PTO would increase agency accuracy by preventing inconsistent representations, and would increase agency efficiency by avoiding informational asymmetry and duplication of effort. Presidents Obama and Trump created enhanced mechanisms that allow the PTO to receive information from counterparts in foreign countries and from industry about what is truly innovative. It would also be helpful for the PTO to enjoy the expertise of its own sister agency, located down the road. Despite scholarly and governmental proposals to mandate cooperation between the FDA and the PTO, such coordination remains limited in practice. This article proposes to break through the invisible wall between the FDA and the PTO, and to open pathways for communication between the two agencies.</p>","PeriodicalId":56266,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","volume":"13 1","pages":"lsag007"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13130058/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Law and the Biosciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jlb/lsag007","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An invisible wall separates the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO). This wall blocks inter-agency communication, depriving the PTO of information relevant to patent applications and depriving the FDA of information relevant to drug-approval applications. Consequently, it is too easy for a drug company to tell the PTO 'our drug is new' (in hopes of speeding a patent grant) while telling the FDA 'our drug is not new' (in hopes of speeding drug approval). Better communication between the FDA and PTO would increase agency accuracy by preventing inconsistent representations, and would increase agency efficiency by avoiding informational asymmetry and duplication of effort. Presidents Obama and Trump created enhanced mechanisms that allow the PTO to receive information from counterparts in foreign countries and from industry about what is truly innovative. It would also be helpful for the PTO to enjoy the expertise of its own sister agency, located down the road. Despite scholarly and governmental proposals to mandate cooperation between the FDA and the PTO, such coordination remains limited in practice. This article proposes to break through the invisible wall between the FDA and the PTO, and to open pathways for communication between the two agencies.

推倒墙:为什么要求FDA和PTO共享信息将改善这两个机构的决策。
美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)和美国专利商标局(PTO)之间隔着一堵看不见的墙。这堵墙阻碍了机构间的沟通,剥夺了PTO与专利申请相关的信息,剥夺了FDA与药物批准申请相关的信息。因此,制药公司很容易告诉PTO“我们的药物是新的”(希望加快专利授予),同时告诉FDA“我们的药物不是新的”(希望加快药物批准)。FDA和PTO之间更好的沟通将通过防止不一致的陈述来提高机构的准确性,并通过避免信息不对称和重复工作来提高机构的效率。奥巴马总统和特朗普总统建立了加强机制,使专利商标局能够从外国同行和工业界获得关于什么是真正创新的信息。对于专利商标局来说,享受其位于这条路上的姊妹机构的专门知识也会有所帮助。尽管学术界和政府建议FDA和PTO之间进行合作,但这种协调在实践中仍然有限。本文建议打破FDA与PTO之间的无形之墙,为两者之间的沟通开辟途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Law and the Biosciences
Journal of Law and the Biosciences Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Law and the Biosciences (JLB) is the first fully Open Access peer-reviewed legal journal focused on the advances at the intersection of law and the biosciences. A co-venture between Duke University, Harvard University Law School, and Stanford University, and published by Oxford University Press, this open access, online, and interdisciplinary academic journal publishes cutting-edge scholarship in this important new field. The Journal contains original and response articles, essays, and commentaries on a wide range of topics, including bioethics, neuroethics, genetics, reproductive technologies, stem cells, enhancement, patent law, and food and drug regulation. JLB is published as one volume with three issues per year with new articles posted online on an ongoing basis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书