Evaluating Emissions Signatures of Handheld Ultrasound in Tactical Medicine: Operational Risk, Detection Threats, and Mitigation Strategies.

Q3 Medicine
Nicholas Tannenbaum, David Baldwin, Bradley Bergum, Ryan Johnson, Matthew Lyon
{"title":"Evaluating Emissions Signatures of Handheld Ultrasound in Tactical Medicine: Operational Risk, Detection Threats, and Mitigation Strategies.","authors":"Nicholas Tannenbaum, David Baldwin, Bradley Bergum, Ryan Johnson, Matthew Lyon","doi":"10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.IZSS-UBUN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Handheld ultrasound devices are increasingly used in battlefield and austere environments for point-of-injury diagnostics, but wireless-enabled models may emit detectable electromagnetic or radiofrequency (RF) signals that could compromise operational security.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Three handheld ultrasound devices (GE VScan Air, Butterfly iQ, Philips Lumify) were evaluated using RF spectrum monitoring (9kHz-3GHz) in a Faraday enclosure and high-resolution computed tomography imaging.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Butterfly iQ and Philips Lumify, both wired devices, exhibited no detectable emissions and lacked wireless components. The GE VScan Air, a wireless device, demonstrated active Bluetooth and Wi-Fi emissions, with internal wireless modules, antenna, and wireless charging coil identified on CT. While within expected parameters, these emissions may be detectable in electronically contested environments.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Wireless handheld ultrasound devices may present an RF signature risk in tactical operations. Mitigation strategies include limiting wireless use, enhancing shielding, and increasing awareness of emissions risk in training and procurement decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/J.Spec.Oper.Med.2026.IZSS-UBUN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Handheld ultrasound devices are increasingly used in battlefield and austere environments for point-of-injury diagnostics, but wireless-enabled models may emit detectable electromagnetic or radiofrequency (RF) signals that could compromise operational security.

Methods: Three handheld ultrasound devices (GE VScan Air, Butterfly iQ, Philips Lumify) were evaluated using RF spectrum monitoring (9kHz-3GHz) in a Faraday enclosure and high-resolution computed tomography imaging.

Results: The Butterfly iQ and Philips Lumify, both wired devices, exhibited no detectable emissions and lacked wireless components. The GE VScan Air, a wireless device, demonstrated active Bluetooth and Wi-Fi emissions, with internal wireless modules, antenna, and wireless charging coil identified on CT. While within expected parameters, these emissions may be detectable in electronically contested environments.

Conclusion: Wireless handheld ultrasound devices may present an RF signature risk in tactical operations. Mitigation strategies include limiting wireless use, enhancing shielding, and increasing awareness of emissions risk in training and procurement decisions.

评估战术医学中手持式超声的发射特征:操作风险、检测威胁和缓解策略。
背景:手持式超声设备越来越多地用于战场和恶劣环境下的损伤点诊断,但无线模式可能会发射可检测的电磁或射频(RF)信号,可能危及操作安全性。方法:采用法拉第罩内射频频谱监测(9kHz-3GHz)和高分辨率计算机断层成像技术对GE VScan Air、Butterfly iQ、Philips Lumify三种手持式超声设备进行评价。结果:蝴蝶iQ和飞利浦Lumify都是有线设备,没有可检测到的辐射,也没有无线组件。GE VScan Air是一款无线设备,通过CT识别内部无线模块、天线和无线充电线圈,展示了主动蓝牙和Wi-Fi发射。虽然在预期参数范围内,但这些排放物可能在电子竞争环境中被检测到。结论:无线手持超声设备在战术操作中可能存在射频信号风险。缓解战略包括限制无线使用、加强屏蔽以及在培训和采购决策中提高对排放风险的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书