Trends in socio-demographic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake by vaccine dose and time after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccination in Israel: epidemiological and policy analysis study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Hala Manaa, Dani Cohen, Khitam Muhsen
{"title":"Trends in socio-demographic disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake by vaccine dose and time after the introduction of COVID-19 vaccination in Israel: epidemiological and policy analysis study.","authors":"Hala Manaa, Dani Cohen, Khitam Muhsen","doi":"10.1186/s13584-026-00758-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evidence on sociodemographic disparities in COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake remains limited. We examined disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the Arab, ultraorthodox Jewish, and general Jewish populations in Israel (January 2021-August 2022), focusing on vaccine dose, community characteristics, and policy analysis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Publicly available COVID-19 data from 135 cities (≥ 10,000 residents) were analyzed. Cumulative vaccine uptake by dose was assessed by age and population group across 3 periods (period-1: to June 2021, period-2: to December 2021, period-3: to August 2022). Policy analysis was conducted using Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle framework, drawing on the literature, government reports, official websites, and media coverage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Data from 76 predominantly non-ultraorthodox Jewish cities, 10 ultraorthodox Jewish cities, and 49 Arab cities were included. Compared to the general Jewish population, dose 1 uptake was lower in ultraorthodox (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99) and Arab cities: IRR = 0.76, 0.53-1.09), with similar gaps for dose 2. Disparities widened with boosters: for dose 3, uptake was significantly lower in ultraorthodox cities (period-2 IRR = 0.38 [0.20-0.74], period-3: IRR = 0.39 [0.20-0.75]); and Arab cities (period-2 IRR = 0.55 [0.38-0.79], period-3 IRR = 0.56 [0.39-0.81]). For dose 4, gaps were largest in adults aged ≥ 60 years (ultraorthodox: IRR = 0.24 [0.12-0.47]; Arab: IRR = 0.15 [0.10-0.22]). Higher socioeconomic status was consistently associated with uptake, particularly for boosters. The peripherality index was associated with lower dose 4 uptake, suggesting geographic disparities and access barriers. Policy analysis highlighted Israel's rapid mass vaccination rollout and evidence-based booster adoption, but also declining booster uptake and widening sociodemographic inequities. The primary campaign relied on centralized mass vaccination efforts and intensive public messaging, achieving high coverage, while the booster phase was mainly integrated into existing infrastructure, with more targeted outreach and reduced media emphasis, shifting from infection prevention to severe-disease prevention policy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Persistent disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake widened during the booster phase in Israel. While rapid, centralized rollout achieved high initial coverage, sustaining equitable uptake proved challenging. These findings highlight the need for ongoing, equity-focused strategies, including targeted outreach and culturally tailored interventions throughout all phases of public health emergencies, particularly in the long-term phase, to strengthen existing healthcare infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":46694,"journal":{"name":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13137699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Israel Journal of Health Policy Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13584-026-00758-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Evidence on sociodemographic disparities in COVID-19 booster vaccine uptake remains limited. We examined disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake among the Arab, ultraorthodox Jewish, and general Jewish populations in Israel (January 2021-August 2022), focusing on vaccine dose, community characteristics, and policy analysis.

Methods: Publicly available COVID-19 data from 135 cities (≥ 10,000 residents) were analyzed. Cumulative vaccine uptake by dose was assessed by age and population group across 3 periods (period-1: to June 2021, period-2: to December 2021, period-3: to August 2022). Policy analysis was conducted using Walt and Gilson's Policy Triangle framework, drawing on the literature, government reports, official websites, and media coverage.

Results: Data from 76 predominantly non-ultraorthodox Jewish cities, 10 ultraorthodox Jewish cities, and 49 Arab cities were included. Compared to the general Jewish population, dose 1 uptake was lower in ultraorthodox (incidence rate ratio (IRR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99) and Arab cities: IRR = 0.76, 0.53-1.09), with similar gaps for dose 2. Disparities widened with boosters: for dose 3, uptake was significantly lower in ultraorthodox cities (period-2 IRR = 0.38 [0.20-0.74], period-3: IRR = 0.39 [0.20-0.75]); and Arab cities (period-2 IRR = 0.55 [0.38-0.79], period-3 IRR = 0.56 [0.39-0.81]). For dose 4, gaps were largest in adults aged ≥ 60 years (ultraorthodox: IRR = 0.24 [0.12-0.47]; Arab: IRR = 0.15 [0.10-0.22]). Higher socioeconomic status was consistently associated with uptake, particularly for boosters. The peripherality index was associated with lower dose 4 uptake, suggesting geographic disparities and access barriers. Policy analysis highlighted Israel's rapid mass vaccination rollout and evidence-based booster adoption, but also declining booster uptake and widening sociodemographic inequities. The primary campaign relied on centralized mass vaccination efforts and intensive public messaging, achieving high coverage, while the booster phase was mainly integrated into existing infrastructure, with more targeted outreach and reduced media emphasis, shifting from infection prevention to severe-disease prevention policy.

Conclusions: Persistent disparities in COVID-19 vaccine uptake widened during the booster phase in Israel. While rapid, centralized rollout achieved high initial coverage, sustaining equitable uptake proved challenging. These findings highlight the need for ongoing, equity-focused strategies, including targeted outreach and culturally tailored interventions throughout all phases of public health emergencies, particularly in the long-term phase, to strengthen existing healthcare infrastructure.

以色列引入COVID-19疫苗接种后按疫苗剂量和时间划分的COVID-19疫苗接种的社会人口差异趋势:流行病学和政策分析研究
背景:关于COVID-19加强疫苗接种的社会人口差异的证据仍然有限。我们研究了2021年1月至2022年8月期间以色列阿拉伯人、极端正统犹太人和普通犹太人接种COVID-19疫苗的差异,重点关注疫苗剂量、社区特征和政策分析。方法:对135个城市(≥1万名居民)公开获取的COVID-19数据进行分析。按年龄和人口群体在3个时期(第1期至2021年6月,第2期至2021年12月,第3期至2022年8月)按剂量评估疫苗的累积吸收率。政策分析使用沃尔特和吉尔森的政策三角框架,借鉴文献,政府报告,官方网站和媒体报道。结果:数据来自76个非极端正统犹太城市、10个极端正统犹太城市和49个阿拉伯城市。与一般犹太人群相比,超正统(发病率比(IRR) = 0.51, 95% CI 0.26-0.99)和阿拉伯城市(IRR = 0.76, 0.53-1.09)的剂量1吸收率较低,剂量2也有类似的差距。增强剂扩大了差异:对于剂量3,超正统城市的吸收明显较低(第2期IRR = 0.38[0.20-0.74],第3期IRR = 0.39 [0.20-0.75]);阿拉伯城市(二期IRR = 0.55[0.38-0.79],三期IRR = 0.56[0.39-0.81])。对于剂量4,差距在≥60岁的成年人中最大(超正统:IRR = 0.24[0.12-0.47];阿拉伯:IRR = 0.15[0.10-0.22])。较高的社会经济地位始终与吸收有关,特别是对助推器。周边指数与较低的剂量4摄取有关,表明地理差异和获取障碍。政策分析强调了以色列的快速大规模疫苗接种和基于证据的加强接种,但也强调了加强接种的减少和社会人口不平等的扩大。初级运动依靠集中的大规模疫苗接种工作和密集的公共信息传播,实现了高覆盖率,而加强阶段主要纳入现有基础设施,开展更有针对性的外联活动,减少媒体重点,从感染预防政策转向严重疾病预防政策。结论:在以色列,COVID-19疫苗接种的持续差异在加强期扩大。虽然快速、集中的推广取得了很高的初始覆盖率,但保持公平的普及证明是一项挑战。这些调查结果突出表明,需要采取持续的、以公平为重点的战略,包括在突发公共卫生事件的所有阶段,特别是在长期阶段,采取有针对性的外展和有文化针对性的干预措施,以加强现有的卫生保健基础设施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.40%
发文量
38
审稿时长
28 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书