Financial reimbursement for clinical trial participation costs: a pilot feasibility study.

IF 4.1 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Courtney P Williams, Nicole L Henderson, Nusrat Jahan, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Andres Azuero, Maria Pisu, Rebecca C Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque
{"title":"Financial reimbursement for clinical trial participation costs: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Courtney P Williams, Nicole L Henderson, Nusrat Jahan, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Andres Azuero, Maria Pisu, Rebecca C Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trial participants rarely represent the real-world treatment population, potentially due to costs associated with participation. Monetary reimbursement for trial-related costs could address financial barriers to trial recruitment and retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods, pilot, feasibility study provided financial reimbursement to women with breast cancer participating in a clinical trial. Patients were reimbursed $1,000/month during their first four months of trial participation, surveyed biweekly to assess changes in financial toxicity, then interviewed to explore the effects of receiving reimbursement on trial-related costs and recruitment and retention. Mixed-effect modeling and thematic analysis were completed. Feasibility was defined as 80% retention of patients on the reimbursement study, with those retained completing 75% of surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39 consented patients, 33 patients completed the pilot study (85% retention, 100% survey completion). Patients were a median 52 years old (IQR 44 to 59), 48% Black, 67% privately insured, and 42% found it difficult to live on their current income. Patient financial toxicity modestly decreased. Patients (n = 32) reported using the reimbursement to pay for trial visit-related food, transportation, caregiver expenses, and out-of-pocket medical costs. Patients felt receiving reimbursement affected trial retention more so than recruitment, stating \"I would have enrolled regardless…[but knowing] it wasn't going to place a financial strain on us because of these reimbursements…It made it easier for me to feel good about continuing.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reimbursement for clinical trial-related costs is feasible, suggests decreases in financial toxicity, and is a promising approach to improve trial retention outcomes in women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov id: </strong>NCT05871125.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical trial participants rarely represent the real-world treatment population, potentially due to costs associated with participation. Monetary reimbursement for trial-related costs could address financial barriers to trial recruitment and retention.

Methods: This mixed methods, pilot, feasibility study provided financial reimbursement to women with breast cancer participating in a clinical trial. Patients were reimbursed $1,000/month during their first four months of trial participation, surveyed biweekly to assess changes in financial toxicity, then interviewed to explore the effects of receiving reimbursement on trial-related costs and recruitment and retention. Mixed-effect modeling and thematic analysis were completed. Feasibility was defined as 80% retention of patients on the reimbursement study, with those retained completing 75% of surveys.

Results: Of 39 consented patients, 33 patients completed the pilot study (85% retention, 100% survey completion). Patients were a median 52 years old (IQR 44 to 59), 48% Black, 67% privately insured, and 42% found it difficult to live on their current income. Patient financial toxicity modestly decreased. Patients (n = 32) reported using the reimbursement to pay for trial visit-related food, transportation, caregiver expenses, and out-of-pocket medical costs. Patients felt receiving reimbursement affected trial retention more so than recruitment, stating "I would have enrolled regardless…[but knowing] it wasn't going to place a financial strain on us because of these reimbursements…It made it easier for me to feel good about continuing."

Conclusion: Reimbursement for clinical trial-related costs is feasible, suggests decreases in financial toxicity, and is a promising approach to improve trial retention outcomes in women with breast cancer.

Clinicaltrials.gov id: NCT05871125.

临床试验参与费用的财务报销:一项试点可行性研究。
背景:临床试验参与者很少代表现实世界的治疗人群,潜在的原因是与参与相关的成本。用货币偿还与试验有关的费用可以解决征聘和保留试验人员的财务障碍。方法:这项混合方法、试点、可行性研究为参加临床试验的乳腺癌妇女提供经济补偿。在参与试验的前四个月,患者每月获得1000美元的报销,每两周接受一次调查,以评估财务毒性的变化,然后进行访谈,以探讨接受报销对试验相关成本和招募和保留的影响。完成混合效应建模和专题分析。可行性定义为80%的患者保留在报销研究中,保留的患者完成了75%的调查。结果:在39名同意的患者中,33名患者完成了初步研究(85%保留,100%完成调查)。患者的中位年龄为52岁(IQR 44 - 59), 48%为黑人,67%为私人保险,42%认为靠目前的收入难以生活。患者的财务毒性略有下降。患者(n = 32)报告使用报销来支付与试验访问相关的食品、交通、护理费用和自付医疗费用。患者认为接受报销比招募更能影响试验保留,他们表示:“无论如何,我都会报名参加……(但知道)报销不会给我们带来财务压力……这让我更容易对继续进行试验感到满意。”结论:临床试验相关费用的报销是可行的,表明降低了财务毒性,并且是一种有希望改善乳腺癌妇女试验保留结果的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书