Courtney P Williams, Nicole L Henderson, Nusrat Jahan, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Andres Azuero, Maria Pisu, Rebecca C Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque
{"title":"Financial reimbursement for clinical trial participation costs: a pilot feasibility study.","authors":"Courtney P Williams, Nicole L Henderson, Nusrat Jahan, Erica Stringer-Reasor, Andres Azuero, Maria Pisu, Rebecca C Arend, Gabrielle B Rocque","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical trial participants rarely represent the real-world treatment population, potentially due to costs associated with participation. Monetary reimbursement for trial-related costs could address financial barriers to trial recruitment and retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed methods, pilot, feasibility study provided financial reimbursement to women with breast cancer participating in a clinical trial. Patients were reimbursed $1,000/month during their first four months of trial participation, surveyed biweekly to assess changes in financial toxicity, then interviewed to explore the effects of receiving reimbursement on trial-related costs and recruitment and retention. Mixed-effect modeling and thematic analysis were completed. Feasibility was defined as 80% retention of patients on the reimbursement study, with those retained completing 75% of surveys.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 39 consented patients, 33 patients completed the pilot study (85% retention, 100% survey completion). Patients were a median 52 years old (IQR 44 to 59), 48% Black, 67% privately insured, and 42% found it difficult to live on their current income. Patient financial toxicity modestly decreased. Patients (n = 32) reported using the reimbursement to pay for trial visit-related food, transportation, caregiver expenses, and out-of-pocket medical costs. Patients felt receiving reimbursement affected trial retention more so than recruitment, stating \"I would have enrolled regardless…[but knowing] it wasn't going to place a financial strain on us because of these reimbursements…It made it easier for me to feel good about continuing.\"</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Reimbursement for clinical trial-related costs is feasible, suggests decreases in financial toxicity, and is a promising approach to improve trial retention outcomes in women with breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Clinicaltrials.gov id: </strong>NCT05871125.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkag048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Clinical trial participants rarely represent the real-world treatment population, potentially due to costs associated with participation. Monetary reimbursement for trial-related costs could address financial barriers to trial recruitment and retention.
Methods: This mixed methods, pilot, feasibility study provided financial reimbursement to women with breast cancer participating in a clinical trial. Patients were reimbursed $1,000/month during their first four months of trial participation, surveyed biweekly to assess changes in financial toxicity, then interviewed to explore the effects of receiving reimbursement on trial-related costs and recruitment and retention. Mixed-effect modeling and thematic analysis were completed. Feasibility was defined as 80% retention of patients on the reimbursement study, with those retained completing 75% of surveys.
Results: Of 39 consented patients, 33 patients completed the pilot study (85% retention, 100% survey completion). Patients were a median 52 years old (IQR 44 to 59), 48% Black, 67% privately insured, and 42% found it difficult to live on their current income. Patient financial toxicity modestly decreased. Patients (n = 32) reported using the reimbursement to pay for trial visit-related food, transportation, caregiver expenses, and out-of-pocket medical costs. Patients felt receiving reimbursement affected trial retention more so than recruitment, stating "I would have enrolled regardless…[but knowing] it wasn't going to place a financial strain on us because of these reimbursements…It made it easier for me to feel good about continuing."
Conclusion: Reimbursement for clinical trial-related costs is feasible, suggests decreases in financial toxicity, and is a promising approach to improve trial retention outcomes in women with breast cancer.