{"title":"Health Disparities and Overactive Bladder: Bridging the Gap.","authors":"Susanna Gunamany, Angeleque Hartt, Rachel Kopkin, Ibukunowola Omole, Ekene A Enemchukwu","doi":"10.1007/s11884-026-00811-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of the review: </strong>Overactive bladder (OAB) affects ~ 33 million Americans. Most studies enroll predominantly educated, non-Hispanic White women, limiting understanding of how social determinants, race/ethnicity, and structural inequities influence OAB burden and treatment. Evidence suggests disparities in prevalence, diagnosis, and guideline-based therapy reflect social and structural factors rather than biology.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Literature from 2010 to 2025 notes higher OAB burden among Black, Hispanic, and lower-income women. Structural barriers (e.g., limited specialist access, high costs, restrictive insurance, and competing needs) reduce care-seeking and therapy adherence. Social and cultural factors, including stigma, mistrust, low health literacy, and language barriers, further limit engagement. Minority and low-income patients utilize pharmacologic and minimally invasive therapies less frequently despite greater symptom severity. Frailty affects treatment selection but does not appear to impact benefit. Strategies to address disparities include inclusive research, culturally tailored education, digital and community-based care, and patient navigators.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>OAB disparities reflect intersecting structural, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. Equity requires inclusive research, responsive education, expanded access, and policy reform to address structural determinants.</p><p><strong>Supplementary information: </strong>The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11884-026-00811-2.</p>","PeriodicalId":10860,"journal":{"name":"Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports","volume":"21 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13124925/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Bladder Dysfunction Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11884-026-00811-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Purpose of the review: Overactive bladder (OAB) affects ~ 33 million Americans. Most studies enroll predominantly educated, non-Hispanic White women, limiting understanding of how social determinants, race/ethnicity, and structural inequities influence OAB burden and treatment. Evidence suggests disparities in prevalence, diagnosis, and guideline-based therapy reflect social and structural factors rather than biology.
Recent findings: Literature from 2010 to 2025 notes higher OAB burden among Black, Hispanic, and lower-income women. Structural barriers (e.g., limited specialist access, high costs, restrictive insurance, and competing needs) reduce care-seeking and therapy adherence. Social and cultural factors, including stigma, mistrust, low health literacy, and language barriers, further limit engagement. Minority and low-income patients utilize pharmacologic and minimally invasive therapies less frequently despite greater symptom severity. Frailty affects treatment selection but does not appear to impact benefit. Strategies to address disparities include inclusive research, culturally tailored education, digital and community-based care, and patient navigators.
Summary: OAB disparities reflect intersecting structural, socioeconomic, and cultural factors. Equity requires inclusive research, responsive education, expanded access, and policy reform to address structural determinants.
Supplementary information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11884-026-00811-2.
期刊介绍:
The aim of this journal is to help readers understand expert views on current advances in the field of bladder dysfunction by systematically providing review articles that highlight the most important papers recently published. We accomplish this aim by appointing major authorities in key subject areas across the discipline to select topics reviewed by leading experts who emphasize recent developments, novel research, and highlight important papers published over the past year on their topics. We also highlight areas that have not received attention in the past and are important to an international audience, such a voiding dysfunction in reconstructed bladders and voiding dysfunction associated with genitourinary infections. An Editorial Board of internationally diverse members also suggests topics of special interest to their country/region and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research.