Impact of automated dispensing cabinets on medication administration efficiency in the emergency department.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Cheng-Ying Chiang, Chia-I Cheng, Yen-Wen Chen, Jian-Heng Lee, Ya-Ni Yeh, Jih-Chun Lin, Hsin-Yi Yang, Chung-Hsien Liu, Ming-Jen Tsai
{"title":"Impact of automated dispensing cabinets on medication administration efficiency in the emergency department.","authors":"Cheng-Ying Chiang, Chia-I Cheng, Yen-Wen Chen, Jian-Heng Lee, Ya-Ni Yeh, Jih-Chun Lin, Hsin-Yi Yang, Chung-Hsien Liu, Ming-Jen Tsai","doi":"10.1186/s12873-026-01600-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Timely medication administration in emergency departments (EDs) is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Automated Dispensing Cabinets (ADCs) may improve point-of-care medication access, yet their impact on administration timeliness is uncertain in ED settings.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between ADC implementation and the timeliness of stat medication administration in a high-volume ED in Taiwan.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing 16,450 adult ED visits from July-August 2019 (pre-ADC) and July-August 2020 (post-ADC). Order-to-administration (OTA) times for stat medications were compared. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses evaluated the association between ADC implementation and timely medication delivery. Sensitivity analyses, including a difference-in-differences model and survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression, were performed to evaluate the robustness of findings.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After adjusting for potential confounders, ADC implementation was independently associated with higher odds of achieving OTA times ≤ 30 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.78). Linear regression showed a mean reduction in OTA time of 3.09 min per prescription (β = - 3.09; 95% CI, - 3.58 to - 2.60). Subgroup analyses showed that ADC implementation was associated with higher odds of achieving OTA ≤ 30 min and shorter OTA times for antibiotics (aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.54-3.12; β = - 4.99; 95% CI, - 7.03 to - 2.94), as well as during daytime (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.58-2.21; β = - 4.34; 95% CI, - 5.26 to - 3.41) and weekend shifts (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; β = - 3.48; 95% CI, - 4.30 to - 2.65). Findings from sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ADC implementation In the ED was associated with modest but operationally meaningful improvements in medication administration timeliness. These findings may be context-dependent and warrant confirmation across diverse workflows and with patient-centered and safety outcomes.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-026-01600-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Timely medication administration in emergency departments (EDs) is essential for optimal patient outcomes. Automated Dispensing Cabinets (ADCs) may improve point-of-care medication access, yet their impact on administration timeliness is uncertain in ED settings.

Objective: To evaluate the association between ADC implementation and the timeliness of stat medication administration in a high-volume ED in Taiwan.

Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study analyzing 16,450 adult ED visits from July-August 2019 (pre-ADC) and July-August 2020 (post-ADC). Order-to-administration (OTA) times for stat medications were compared. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses evaluated the association between ADC implementation and timely medication delivery. Sensitivity analyses, including a difference-in-differences model and survival analysis using Kaplan-Meier curves and multivariable Cox regression, were performed to evaluate the robustness of findings.

Results: After adjusting for potential confounders, ADC implementation was independently associated with higher odds of achieving OTA times ≤ 30 min (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.78). Linear regression showed a mean reduction in OTA time of 3.09 min per prescription (β = - 3.09; 95% CI, - 3.58 to - 2.60). Subgroup analyses showed that ADC implementation was associated with higher odds of achieving OTA ≤ 30 min and shorter OTA times for antibiotics (aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.54-3.12; β = - 4.99; 95% CI, - 7.03 to - 2.94), as well as during daytime (aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.58-2.21; β = - 4.34; 95% CI, - 5.26 to - 3.41) and weekend shifts (aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; β = - 3.48; 95% CI, - 4.30 to - 2.65). Findings from sensitivity analyses were consistent with the primary results.

Conclusion: ADC implementation In the ED was associated with modest but operationally meaningful improvements in medication administration timeliness. These findings may be context-dependent and warrant confirmation across diverse workflows and with patient-centered and safety outcomes.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

自动配药柜对急诊科给药效率的影响。
背景:在急诊科(EDs)及时给药是优化患者预后的必要条件。自动配药柜(adc)可以改善护理点药物获取,但其对急诊科设置的给药及时性的影响尚不确定。目的:评估台湾大容量急诊科ADC实施与stat给药及时性之间的关系。方法:我们进行了回顾性观察研究,分析了2019年7月至8月(adc前)和2020年7月至8月(adc后)的16,450例成人ED就诊。比较两种药物的从下单到给药(OTA)时间。多变量logistic和线性回归分析评估了ADC实施与及时给药之间的关系。采用敏感性分析,包括差中差模型和Kaplan-Meier曲线和多变量Cox回归进行生存分析,以评估研究结果的稳健性。结果:在对潜在混杂因素进行校正后,ADC实施与实现OTA时间≤30 min的较高几率独立相关(校正优势比[aOR]为1.59;95%置信区间[CI]为1.42-1.78)。线性回归显示,每个处方的OTA时间平均减少3.09分钟(β = - 3.09; 95% CI, - 3.58至- 2.60)。亚组分析显示,ADC的实施与抗生素实现OTA≤30分钟的几率更高,OTA时间更短(aOR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.54-3.12; β = - 4.99; 95% CI, - 7.03至- 2.94),以及白天(aOR, 1.87; 95% CI, 1.58-2.21; β = - 4.34; 95% CI, - 5.26至- 3.41)和周末轮班(aOR, 1.66; 95% CI, 1.34-2.05; β = - 3.48; 95% CI, - 4.30至- 2.65)相关。敏感性分析结果与初步结果一致。结论:在ED中实施ADC与给药及时性的适度改善有关,但在操作上有意义。这些发现可能与环境有关,需要在不同的工作流程中进行确认,并以患者为中心和安全的结果。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书