Current Practices and Opinions Related to Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients With Sepsis: An International Survey.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Alexander J Ruehman, Emma Covington, Trisha N Branan, W Anthony Hawkins, Susan E Smith
{"title":"Current Practices and Opinions Related to Hemodynamic Optimization in Patients With Sepsis: An International Survey.","authors":"Alexander J Ruehman, Emma Covington, Trisha N Branan, W Anthony Hawkins, Susan E Smith","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2026584","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines were last updated in 2021, with many recommendations based on evidence of low or very low quality.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess practices and opinions regarding hemodynamic optimization in patients with sepsis and the adoption of updated recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine addressed practices and opinions regarding initial fluid resuscitation and thresholds for initiation of adjunctive vasopressors and corticosteroids. Responses were analyzed for patients with vs without obesity and stratified by respondent profession and experience. The primary outcome was guideline-suggested use of ideal body weight to dose initial fluids in patients without obesity. Variables were compared using the χ2 test, with P < .05 indicating statistical significance.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Completed questionnaires were returned by 485 society members. In patients without obesity, 17% of respondents dosed initial resuscitation fluids by using ideal body weight, whereas 80% and 3% used total and adjusted body weights, respectively. Respondents with more than 20 years in practice were more likely to use ideal body weight (20%) than those with less than 5 years (12%) (P = .008). In terms of opinions, 57% of respondents preferred use of total body weight in patients without obesity, whereas 37% and 6% preferred ideal body weight and adjusted body weight, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study showed differences in practices based on experience. Clinicians' opinions aligned more closely with guideline statements than did actual practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"35 3","pages":"191-198"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2026584","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines were last updated in 2021, with many recommendations based on evidence of low or very low quality.

Objective: To assess practices and opinions regarding hemodynamic optimization in patients with sepsis and the adoption of updated recommendations.

Methods: A cross-sectional survey of members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine addressed practices and opinions regarding initial fluid resuscitation and thresholds for initiation of adjunctive vasopressors and corticosteroids. Responses were analyzed for patients with vs without obesity and stratified by respondent profession and experience. The primary outcome was guideline-suggested use of ideal body weight to dose initial fluids in patients without obesity. Variables were compared using the χ2 test, with P < .05 indicating statistical significance.

Results: Completed questionnaires were returned by 485 society members. In patients without obesity, 17% of respondents dosed initial resuscitation fluids by using ideal body weight, whereas 80% and 3% used total and adjusted body weights, respectively. Respondents with more than 20 years in practice were more likely to use ideal body weight (20%) than those with less than 5 years (12%) (P = .008). In terms of opinions, 57% of respondents preferred use of total body weight in patients without obesity, whereas 37% and 6% preferred ideal body weight and adjusted body weight, respectively.

Conclusions: This study showed differences in practices based on experience. Clinicians' opinions aligned more closely with guideline statements than did actual practices.

脓毒症患者血流动力学优化的当前实践和观点:一项国际调查。
背景:生存败血症运动指南于2021年更新,其中许多建议基于低质量或极低质量的证据。目的:评估脓毒症患者血流动力学优化的实践和意见,并采用最新的建议。方法:对危重医学学会成员进行横断面调查,讨论有关初始液体复苏和辅助血管加压剂和皮质类固醇起始阈值的实践和意见。对肥胖患者和非肥胖患者的反应进行分析,并按应答者的职业和经验分层。主要结果是指南建议使用理想体重来给非肥胖患者初始补液。变量间比较采用χ2检验,以P < 0.05为有统计学意义。结果:485名学会会员完成问卷调查。在没有肥胖的患者中,17%的应答者使用理想体重给药,而80%和3%分别使用总体重和调整体重。从业时间超过20年的受访者(20%)比从业时间不足5年的受访者(12%)更倾向于使用理想体重(P = 0.008)。在意见方面,57%的受访者更倾向于使用非肥胖患者的总体重,而37%和6%的受访者更倾向于理想体重和调整体重。结论:本研究显示了基于经验的实践差异。临床医生的意见比实际操作更接近指南声明。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书