Transforming Care: Insourcing Acute Care Dialysis Services to Improve Patient Care.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Brittni McGill, Denny Hinkle, Christine McMurray, Steve Singley, Brandon Felts
{"title":"Transforming Care: Insourcing Acute Care Dialysis Services to Improve Patient Care.","authors":"Brittni McGill, Denny Hinkle, Christine McMurray, Steve Singley, Brandon Felts","doi":"10.4037/ajcc2026766","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Quality improvement and cost-reduction efforts among health systems have led to critical evaluation of acute dialysis delivery models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To understand the clinical and financial impact of transitioning from contracted third-party (outsourced) dialysis services to health system-owned (insourced) dialysis services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Real-world dialysis data at a regional hospital before and after insourcing using the Tablo Hemodialysis System (Outset Medical, Inc) were compared. Previous outsourcing data were compared with data from the first 12 months of insourced dialysis (presented by quarter). Analysis included number of treatments, success of treatments (by clinician determination and by successful fluid removal), and central line (catheter)-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Satisfaction surveys of patients and staff also were collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Insourced dialysis achieved higher treatment success, lower CLABSI rates, and high patient and staff satisfaction. Amid a posttransition increase in the number of treatments of 279%, insourced dialysis achieved a 27% increase in treatment success by clinician determination, with more than 97% of treatments considered successful. Successful fluid removal improved from 50.8% to more than 70% across all quarters. The CLABSI rate decreased 72.7% (from 1.1 to 0.3). Retention of dialysis staff was 100% for 12 months. High staff satisfaction with their role in dialysis and insourcing was complemented with high patient satisfaction scores. Capital secured upfront was paid for within the first quarter of insourcing.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Insourcing dialysis with the Tablo Hemodialysis System at a regional hospital markedly improved multiple clinical and financial metrics with high staff and patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":7607,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Critical Care","volume":"35 3","pages":"233-236"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4037/ajcc2026766","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Quality improvement and cost-reduction efforts among health systems have led to critical evaluation of acute dialysis delivery models.

Objective: To understand the clinical and financial impact of transitioning from contracted third-party (outsourced) dialysis services to health system-owned (insourced) dialysis services.

Methods: Real-world dialysis data at a regional hospital before and after insourcing using the Tablo Hemodialysis System (Outset Medical, Inc) were compared. Previous outsourcing data were compared with data from the first 12 months of insourced dialysis (presented by quarter). Analysis included number of treatments, success of treatments (by clinician determination and by successful fluid removal), and central line (catheter)-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) rates. Satisfaction surveys of patients and staff also were collected.

Results: Insourced dialysis achieved higher treatment success, lower CLABSI rates, and high patient and staff satisfaction. Amid a posttransition increase in the number of treatments of 279%, insourced dialysis achieved a 27% increase in treatment success by clinician determination, with more than 97% of treatments considered successful. Successful fluid removal improved from 50.8% to more than 70% across all quarters. The CLABSI rate decreased 72.7% (from 1.1 to 0.3). Retention of dialysis staff was 100% for 12 months. High staff satisfaction with their role in dialysis and insourcing was complemented with high patient satisfaction scores. Capital secured upfront was paid for within the first quarter of insourcing.

Conclusions: Insourcing dialysis with the Tablo Hemodialysis System at a regional hospital markedly improved multiple clinical and financial metrics with high staff and patient satisfaction.

转变护理:内包急性护理透析服务以改善患者护理。
背景:卫生系统中质量改进和成本降低的努力导致了对急性透析交付模式的关键评估。目的:了解从承包第三方(外包)透析服务向卫生系统自有(内包)透析服务过渡的临床和财务影响。方法:对一家地区医院使用Tablo血液透析系统(Outset Medical, Inc)内包前后的真实透析数据进行比较。将以前的外包数据与内包透析的前12个月的数据进行比较(按季度呈现)。分析包括治疗次数、治疗成功(由临床医生确定和成功的液体清除)和中心静脉(导管)相关血流感染(CLABSI)率。还收集了患者和工作人员的满意度调查。结果:内源透析治疗成功率高,CLABSI发生率低,患者和工作人员满意度高。在转换后治疗数量增加了279%的情况下,经临床医生确定,内源透析治疗成功率增加了27%,超过97%的治疗被认为是成功的。在所有季度中,流体清除成功率从50.8%提高到70%以上。CLABSI率下降72.7%(从1.1降至0.3)。透析人员12个月的保留率为100%。员工对他们在透析和内包中的作用的高满意度与高患者满意度评分相辅相成。预先担保的资金在内包的第一季度内支付。结论:一家地区医院采用Tablo血液透析系统进行内包透析,显著改善了多项临床和财务指标,员工和患者满意度均较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
103
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The editors of the American Journal of Critical Care (AJCC) invite authors to submit original manuscripts describing investigations, advances, or observations from all specialties related to the care of critically and acutely ill patients. Papers promoting collaborative practice and research are encouraged. Manuscripts will be considered on the understanding that they have not been published elsewhere and have been submitted solely to AJCC.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书