Rethinking Social Media in Youth Health Promotion: Navigating Ethics, Equity, and Algorithmic Risk.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Acadia W Buro, Molly M Serena Gomes
{"title":"Rethinking Social Media in Youth Health Promotion: Navigating Ethics, Equity, and Algorithmic Risk.","authors":"Acadia W Buro, Molly M Serena Gomes","doi":"10.1177/08901171261448035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundSocial media platforms offer scalable opportunities for youth-focused health behavior interventions, but their commercial design, data extraction practices, and algorithmic content delivery raise ethical, legal, and equity-related concerns.MethodsThis commentary examines how these platform features may introduce unintended risks for youth participants, including surveillance, screen time-related harms, and digital exclusion.ResultsKey risks include (1) data collection and surveillance practices that may undermine privacy and informed consent; (2) engagement-driven platform features that may increase screen time exposure, amplify exposure to harmful ot conflicting content, and contribute to adverse psychosocial outcomes; and (3) structural inequities in digital access, literacy, and targeted content that may exacerbate health disparities. Platform-specific affordances further shape exposure to risks such as social comparison, misinformation, and algorithmic bias.ConclusionSocial media-based interventions hold promise but require careful evaluation of platform environments. Research should prioritize transparency in data practices, evaluate psychosocial and equity-related outcomes, and incorporate safeguards to support safer, more equitable youth health promotion.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171261448035"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261448035","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundSocial media platforms offer scalable opportunities for youth-focused health behavior interventions, but their commercial design, data extraction practices, and algorithmic content delivery raise ethical, legal, and equity-related concerns.MethodsThis commentary examines how these platform features may introduce unintended risks for youth participants, including surveillance, screen time-related harms, and digital exclusion.ResultsKey risks include (1) data collection and surveillance practices that may undermine privacy and informed consent; (2) engagement-driven platform features that may increase screen time exposure, amplify exposure to harmful ot conflicting content, and contribute to adverse psychosocial outcomes; and (3) structural inequities in digital access, literacy, and targeted content that may exacerbate health disparities. Platform-specific affordances further shape exposure to risks such as social comparison, misinformation, and algorithmic bias.ConclusionSocial media-based interventions hold promise but require careful evaluation of platform environments. Research should prioritize transparency in data practices, evaluate psychosocial and equity-related outcomes, and incorporate safeguards to support safer, more equitable youth health promotion.

重新思考社会媒体在青少年健康促进:导航伦理,公平,和算法风险。
社交媒体平台为以青年为重点的健康行为干预提供了可扩展的机会,但其商业设计、数据提取实践和算法内容交付引发了道德、法律和与公平相关的担忧。本文探讨了这些平台的特点如何给青少年参与者带来意想不到的风险,包括监控、与屏幕时间相关的危害和数字排斥。主要风险包括:(1)数据收集和监控实践可能损害隐私和知情同意;(2)参与驱动的平台特征可能增加屏幕暴露时间,放大有害或冲突内容的暴露,并导致不良的社会心理结果;(3)数字访问、扫盲和有针对性内容方面的结构性不平等可能加剧健康差距。特定于平台的启示进一步塑造了社交比较、错误信息和算法偏见等风险。基于社交媒体的干预措施具有前景,但需要仔细评估平台环境。研究应优先考虑数据做法的透明度,评估社会心理和与公平有关的结果,并纳入保障措施,以支持更安全、更公平的青年健康促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书