Parturients' Perspectives on Labor Pain and Epidural Analgesia: An Explorative Qualitative Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
L Højstrup, S Bohart, L Thellesen, K Wildgaard
{"title":"Parturients' Perspectives on Labor Pain and Epidural Analgesia: An Explorative Qualitative Study.","authors":"L Højstrup, S Bohart, L Thellesen, K Wildgaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.70195","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Labor pain is among the most intense forms of pain, yet its subjective and multidimensional nature makes it challenging to assess and manage. Labor epidural analgesia is the most effective method of relief, but clinical practice often emphasizes physical outcomes while overlooking cognitive and emotional dimensions. This study aimed to explore parturients' perceptions of labor pain and relief with labor epidural analgesia, and to inform more comprehensive, patient-centered approaches to pain management.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 postpartum women within 24 h of delivery at a Danish university hospital. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. A study protocol was published before data collection.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four themes were identified: (1) An extreme pain experience, (2) From nightmare to a good experience, (3) The dilemma of choice: social norms and practical realities, and (4) Great trust in staff. Labor pain was described as overwhelming and often beyond expectations. Although many hoped for an unmedicated birth, epidural analgesia provided crucial psychological relief, described as a \"mental break,\" which helped restore energy and mental presence. Despite overall satisfaction, most women did not recall discussing what effective pain relief meant to them, suggesting strong trust in staff but also missed opportunities for individualized care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Psychological relief is a key component of effective labor pain management. Antenatal counseling and intrapartum care could consider addressing not only the physical but also the psychological effects of labor epidural analgesia, while fostering open dialog about women's individual goals. Our findings point to the need for multidimensional, clinically relevant assessment tools that move beyond pain intensity to also capture mental capacity, functionality, and emotional well-being. Existing tools may be modified, or new ones developed, to incorporate items on cognitive abilities (e.g., concentration, communication), and physical functioning (e.g., ability to eat or drink).</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>This study examined women's experiences of labor pain and pain relief with epidural analgesia at a Danish university hospital. Interviews with 14 women revealed four main themes: extreme pain, a shift from negative to positive birth experiences, the influence of social norms on decision-making, and strong trust in healthcare staff. Epidural analgesia offered both physical and psychological relief, described as a \"mental break\" that restored energy and presence. While satisfaction was high, individualized discussions about pain relief were often lacking. The study emphasizes that effective pain management should address psychological as well as physical aspects, using broader assessment tools that consider emotional and functional well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"70 3","pages":"e70195"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70195","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Labor pain is among the most intense forms of pain, yet its subjective and multidimensional nature makes it challenging to assess and manage. Labor epidural analgesia is the most effective method of relief, but clinical practice often emphasizes physical outcomes while overlooking cognitive and emotional dimensions. This study aimed to explore parturients' perceptions of labor pain and relief with labor epidural analgesia, and to inform more comprehensive, patient-centered approaches to pain management.

Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 postpartum women within 24 h of delivery at a Danish university hospital. Data were analyzed using inductive thematic analysis and reported in accordance with the Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. A study protocol was published before data collection.

Results: Four themes were identified: (1) An extreme pain experience, (2) From nightmare to a good experience, (3) The dilemma of choice: social norms and practical realities, and (4) Great trust in staff. Labor pain was described as overwhelming and often beyond expectations. Although many hoped for an unmedicated birth, epidural analgesia provided crucial psychological relief, described as a "mental break," which helped restore energy and mental presence. Despite overall satisfaction, most women did not recall discussing what effective pain relief meant to them, suggesting strong trust in staff but also missed opportunities for individualized care.

Conclusions: Psychological relief is a key component of effective labor pain management. Antenatal counseling and intrapartum care could consider addressing not only the physical but also the psychological effects of labor epidural analgesia, while fostering open dialog about women's individual goals. Our findings point to the need for multidimensional, clinically relevant assessment tools that move beyond pain intensity to also capture mental capacity, functionality, and emotional well-being. Existing tools may be modified, or new ones developed, to incorporate items on cognitive abilities (e.g., concentration, communication), and physical functioning (e.g., ability to eat or drink).

Editorial comment: This study examined women's experiences of labor pain and pain relief with epidural analgesia at a Danish university hospital. Interviews with 14 women revealed four main themes: extreme pain, a shift from negative to positive birth experiences, the influence of social norms on decision-making, and strong trust in healthcare staff. Epidural analgesia offered both physical and psychological relief, described as a "mental break" that restored energy and presence. While satisfaction was high, individualized discussions about pain relief were often lacking. The study emphasizes that effective pain management should address psychological as well as physical aspects, using broader assessment tools that consider emotional and functional well-being.

产妇对分娩疼痛和硬膜外镇痛的看法:一项探索性质的研究。
背景:分娩疼痛是最强烈的疼痛形式之一,但其主观和多维的性质使其具有挑战性的评估和管理。分娩硬膜外镇痛是最有效的缓解方法,但临床实践往往强调身体结果,而忽视认知和情绪方面。本研究旨在探讨产妇对分娩疼痛和硬膜外镇痛的感知,并为更全面、以患者为中心的疼痛管理方法提供信息。方法:对丹麦某大学附属医院14名产后24小时内产妇进行半结构化访谈。数据分析采用归纳专题分析,并按照定性研究报告标准进行报告。所有参与者均获得书面知情同意。数据收集前公布了研究方案。结果:确定了四个主题:(1)极度痛苦的经历;(2)从噩梦到美好的经历;(3)选择的困境:社会规范和现实现实;(4)对员工的高度信任。分娩疼痛被描述为压倒性的,经常超出预期。尽管许多人希望不用药物分娩,但硬膜外镇痛提供了关键的心理缓解,被称为“精神休息”,有助于恢复精力和精神存在。尽管总体满意,但大多数女性不记得讨论过有效的疼痛缓解对她们意味着什么,这表明对工作人员的强烈信任,但也错过了个性化护理的机会。结论:心理缓解是有效分娩疼痛管理的关键组成部分。产前咨询和产时护理可以考虑解决硬膜外镇痛的生理和心理影响,同时促进对妇女个人目标的公开对话。我们的研究结果指出,需要多维的、临床相关的评估工具,这些工具不仅要超越疼痛强度,还要捕捉心理能力、功能和情绪健康。现有的工具可能会被修改,或者开发新的工具,以纳入认知能力(例如,注意力,沟通)和身体功能(例如,饮食能力)方面的项目。编者按:本研究调查了丹麦一所大学医院妇女分娩疼痛和硬膜外镇痛的经历。对14名妇女的采访揭示了四个主题:极度痛苦,从消极到积极的分娩经历的转变,社会规范对决策的影响,以及对医护人员的强烈信任。硬膜外镇痛提供了身体和心理上的缓解,被描述为一种“精神休息”,恢复了能量和存在感。虽然满意度很高,但通常缺乏关于缓解疼痛的个性化讨论。该研究强调,有效的疼痛管理应该解决心理和身体方面的问题,使用更广泛的评估工具,考虑情绪和功能健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书