Anesthetic Management for Manual Removal of Retained Placenta in Parturients Without Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Retrospective Multicenter Real-World Study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yair Binyamin, Iris Milner-Fridman, Rony Chen, Avia Ashur, Shai Fein, Eran Hadar, Anat Shmueli, Michal Y-Livne, Alexander Smirnov, Amit Frenkel, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Karam Azem
{"title":"Anesthetic Management for Manual Removal of Retained Placenta in Parturients Without Labor Epidural Analgesia: A Retrospective Multicenter Real-World Study.","authors":"Yair Binyamin, Iris Milner-Fridman, Rony Chen, Avia Ashur, Shai Fein, Eran Hadar, Anat Shmueli, Michal Y-Livne, Alexander Smirnov, Amit Frenkel, Sharon Orbach-Zinger, Karam Azem","doi":"10.1111/aas.70247","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Manual removal of placenta (MRP) is required in 0.1%-3.3% of vaginal births. For patients who give birth without labor epidural analgesia, the choice between neuraxial or general anesthesia (GA) with or without tracheal intubation presents unique challenges. This study describes anesthetic management practices for these cases.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 423 patients undergoing MRP at two tertiary centers in Israel (Soroka and Rabin Medical Centers) from 2016 to 2022. We collected data on anesthetic techniques, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes, comparing patients managed with and without tracheal intubation during GA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>GA was used in 409 (96.7%) cases, with 269 (65.8%) patients managed with tracheal intubation and 140 (34.2%) receiving tubeless GA. Patients who received tubeless GA had lower rates of intraoperative complications, including hypotension (16.4% vs. 26.0%, p = 0.034), vasopressor use (10.0% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.006), and blood product transfusions (3.6% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed associations between higher body mass index (aOR = 2.19), elevated heart rate (aOR = 1.86), and tracheal intubation. Tracheal intubation rates significantly declined from 2016 to 2022 following the introduction of gastric ultrasound in our practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anesthetic management for MRP should be individualized based on clinical factors. In our cohort, tubeless GA was preferred for fasted, lower BMI, and hemodynamically stable patients, with tracheal intubation typically reserved for more complex cases, reflecting inherent selection bias. This study was descriptive in nature and was not designed to establish the safety of any particular technique. Further high-quality research is needed to validate these findings and refine anesthetic guidelines for MRP.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>MRP is a rare obstetric procedure that can be challenging to manage without prior epidural analgesia. A retrospective study of 423 patients in two Israeli hospitals (2016-2022) found that most cases (96.7%) used GA, with about two-thirds involving tracheal intubation and one-third using tubeless techniques. Tubeless anesthesia was associated with less hypotension, reduced need for vasopressors, and fewer blood transfusions. Patients with higher BMI and heart rate were more likely to be intubated. Intubation rates decreased over time after gastric ultrasound was introduced in this cohort. Overall, the study suggests tailoring anesthesia choice to the patient, with no endotracheal intubation approaches safe for selected stable cases, though more research is needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"70 6","pages":"e70247"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.70247","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Manual removal of placenta (MRP) is required in 0.1%-3.3% of vaginal births. For patients who give birth without labor epidural analgesia, the choice between neuraxial or general anesthesia (GA) with or without tracheal intubation presents unique challenges. This study describes anesthetic management practices for these cases.

Methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study analyzed 423 patients undergoing MRP at two tertiary centers in Israel (Soroka and Rabin Medical Centers) from 2016 to 2022. We collected data on anesthetic techniques, patient characteristics, and clinical outcomes, comparing patients managed with and without tracheal intubation during GA.

Results: GA was used in 409 (96.7%) cases, with 269 (65.8%) patients managed with tracheal intubation and 140 (34.2%) receiving tubeless GA. Patients who received tubeless GA had lower rates of intraoperative complications, including hypotension (16.4% vs. 26.0%, p = 0.034), vasopressor use (10.0% vs. 20.8%, p = 0.006), and blood product transfusions (3.6% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.006). Multivariable analysis revealed associations between higher body mass index (aOR = 2.19), elevated heart rate (aOR = 1.86), and tracheal intubation. Tracheal intubation rates significantly declined from 2016 to 2022 following the introduction of gastric ultrasound in our practice.

Conclusion: Anesthetic management for MRP should be individualized based on clinical factors. In our cohort, tubeless GA was preferred for fasted, lower BMI, and hemodynamically stable patients, with tracheal intubation typically reserved for more complex cases, reflecting inherent selection bias. This study was descriptive in nature and was not designed to establish the safety of any particular technique. Further high-quality research is needed to validate these findings and refine anesthetic guidelines for MRP.

Editorial comment: MRP is a rare obstetric procedure that can be challenging to manage without prior epidural analgesia. A retrospective study of 423 patients in two Israeli hospitals (2016-2022) found that most cases (96.7%) used GA, with about two-thirds involving tracheal intubation and one-third using tubeless techniques. Tubeless anesthesia was associated with less hypotension, reduced need for vasopressors, and fewer blood transfusions. Patients with higher BMI and heart rate were more likely to be intubated. Intubation rates decreased over time after gastric ultrasound was introduced in this cohort. Overall, the study suggests tailoring anesthesia choice to the patient, with no endotracheal intubation approaches safe for selected stable cases, though more research is needed.

无分娩硬膜外镇痛的产妇手工移除残留胎盘的麻醉管理:一项回顾性多中心真实世界研究。
背景:0.1%-3.3%的阴道分娩需要人工移除胎盘。对于无分娩硬膜外镇痛的患者,在有或没有气管插管的轴向麻醉或全身麻醉(GA)之间的选择提出了独特的挑战。本研究描述了这些病例的麻醉管理实践。方法:本多中心回顾性队列研究分析了2016年至2022年在以色列两家三级医疗中心(Soroka和Rabin医疗中心)接受MRP治疗的423例患者。我们收集了麻醉技术、患者特征和临床结果的数据,比较了GA期间气管插管和不插管的患者。结果:409例(96.7%)患者采用GA,其中269例(65.8%)患者采用气管插管,140例(34.2%)患者采用无管GA。接受无管GA的患者术中并发症发生率较低,包括低血压(16.4%比26.0%,p = 0.034)、血管加压剂使用(10.0%比20.8%,p = 0.006)和血液制品输注(3.6%比11.9%,p = 0.006)。多变量分析显示高体重指数(aOR = 2.19)、心率升高(aOR = 1.86)和气管插管之间存在关联。在我们的实践中引入胃超声后,气管插管率从2016年到2022年显著下降。结论:MRP的麻醉管理应根据临床因素进行个体化。在我们的队列中,无管GA优先用于禁食、低BMI和血流动力学稳定的患者,气管插管通常用于更复杂的病例,反映了固有的选择偏差。这项研究本质上是描述性的,并不是为了确定任何特定技术的安全性。需要进一步的高质量研究来验证这些发现并完善MRP的麻醉指南。编辑评论:MRP是一种罕见的产科手术,在没有事先硬膜外镇痛的情况下很难管理。一项对以色列两家医院(2016-2022年)423例患者的回顾性研究发现,大多数病例(96.7%)使用GA,其中约三分之二涉及气管插管,三分之一使用无管技术。无管麻醉与低血压、血管加压药物需求减少和输血减少有关。BMI和心率较高的患者更有可能插管。在本队列中引入胃超声后,插管率随着时间的推移而下降。总的来说,该研究建议为患者量身定制麻醉选择,尽管需要更多的研究,但对于选定的稳定病例,没有气管插管方法是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书