The European Bifurcation Club randomised trial of stepwise provisional stenting versus Drug Coated Balloon therapy for non-left main true coronary bifurcations: The EBC DCB Trial.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Christopher J Broyd, Sandeep Arunothayaraj, Bruno Scheller, Simon Eccleshall, Jens F Lassen, Goran Stankovic, David Hildick-Smith
{"title":"The European Bifurcation Club randomised trial of stepwise provisional stenting versus Drug Coated Balloon therapy for non-left main true coronary bifurcations: The EBC DCB Trial.","authors":"Christopher J Broyd, Sandeep Arunothayaraj, Bruno Scheller, Simon Eccleshall, Jens F Lassen, Goran Stankovic, David Hildick-Smith","doi":"10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107463","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Drug eluting stents (DES) are associated with a 2% annual failure rate and have worse outcomes at coronary bifurcations. Recent randomised control data has shown the non-inferiority of drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus stents at 1 year. Possible benefits of DCBs include the lack of a metal prosthesis, absence of stent malapposition, lack of obligate antiplatelet treatment, and maintenance of vessel geometry and function.</p><p><strong>Hypothesis: </strong>The use of DCBs in the treatment of non-left main bifurcation disease is non-inferior to a DES strategy for Target Bifurcation Failure (TBF) at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Strategy design: </strong>The EBC DCB trial is a non-blinded, investigator-initiated, randomised control trial that will recruit 750 patients with non-left main bifurcations requiring revascularisation. Both main vessel and side branch must have significant atheroma. Subacute (NSTEMI and unstable angina) and elective presentations will be eligible for inclusion. Patients will be randomised to either a step-wise provisional DES or a DCB strategy. Major exclusion criteria include STEMI in the previous 48 hours, chronic total occlusions and in-stent restenosis. The primary endpoint of TBF is a composite of cardiovascular death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction or target bifurcation revascularisation. Patients will be followed up at 6 months, 1, 3, 5 and 8 years. If non-inferiority is met, superiority will be tested.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>EBC DCB is an open label, multi-centre, international randomized control trial comparing the use of DCB and DES in the treatment of coronary artery bifurcation disease. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06822322).</p>","PeriodicalId":7868,"journal":{"name":"American heart journal","volume":" ","pages":"107463"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American heart journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2026.107463","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Drug eluting stents (DES) are associated with a 2% annual failure rate and have worse outcomes at coronary bifurcations. Recent randomised control data has shown the non-inferiority of drug-coated balloons (DCB) versus stents at 1 year. Possible benefits of DCBs include the lack of a metal prosthesis, absence of stent malapposition, lack of obligate antiplatelet treatment, and maintenance of vessel geometry and function.

Hypothesis: The use of DCBs in the treatment of non-left main bifurcation disease is non-inferior to a DES strategy for Target Bifurcation Failure (TBF) at 1 year.

Strategy design: The EBC DCB trial is a non-blinded, investigator-initiated, randomised control trial that will recruit 750 patients with non-left main bifurcations requiring revascularisation. Both main vessel and side branch must have significant atheroma. Subacute (NSTEMI and unstable angina) and elective presentations will be eligible for inclusion. Patients will be randomised to either a step-wise provisional DES or a DCB strategy. Major exclusion criteria include STEMI in the previous 48 hours, chronic total occlusions and in-stent restenosis. The primary endpoint of TBF is a composite of cardiovascular death, target bifurcation myocardial infarction or target bifurcation revascularisation. Patients will be followed up at 6 months, 1, 3, 5 and 8 years. If non-inferiority is met, superiority will be tested.

Summary: EBC DCB is an open label, multi-centre, international randomized control trial comparing the use of DCB and DES in the treatment of coronary artery bifurcation disease. The trial is registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT06822322).

欧洲分支俱乐部对非左主真冠状动脉分叉的逐步临时支架置入与药物涂层球囊治疗的随机试验:EBC DCB试验。
背景:药物洗脱支架(DES)与每年2%的失败率相关,并且在冠状动脉分叉时预后更差。最近的随机对照数据显示,药物包被球囊(DCB)与支架相比,在1年的时间里没有劣效性。DCBs可能的好处包括不需要金属假体,不存在支架错位,不需要专门的抗血小板治疗,维持血管的几何形状和功能。假设:在治疗非左主干分叉疾病时,使用dcb治疗1年靶分叉失败(TBF)的效果不低于DES策略。策略设计:EBC DCB试验是一项非盲法、研究者发起的随机对照试验,将招募750名需要血运重建的非左主干分叉患者。主血管和侧分支都必须有明显的动脉粥样硬化。亚急性(NSTEMI和不稳定型心绞痛)和选择性表现将符合纳入条件。患者将随机分配到分步临时DES或DCB策略。主要排除标准包括前48小时STEMI、慢性全闭塞和支架内再狭窄。TBF的主要终点是心血管死亡、靶分叉心肌梗死或靶分叉血运重建的复合终点。随访时间分别为6个月、1年、3年、5年和8年。如果满足非劣性,则检验优越性。摘要:EBC DCB是一项开放标签、多中心、国际随机对照试验,比较DCB和DES在冠状动脉分叉疾病治疗中的应用。该试验已在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT06822322)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American heart journal
American heart journal 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
2.10%
发文量
214
审稿时长
38 days
期刊介绍: The American Heart Journal will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the broad discipline of cardiovascular disease. Our goal is to provide the reader primary investigation, scholarly review, and opinion concerning the practice of cardiovascular medicine. We especially encourage submission of 3 types of reports that are not frequently seen in cardiovascular journals: negative clinical studies, reports on study designs, and studies involving the organization of medical care. The Journal does not accept individual case reports or original articles involving bench laboratory or animal research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书