Investigating Internet Use and Patient Engagement: The Moderating Role of Patient-Centered Communication on Information Overload and Health Anxiety.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Hae Yeon Seo, Wei Peng, Sultana Ismet Jerin
{"title":"Investigating Internet Use and Patient Engagement: The Moderating Role of Patient-Centered Communication on Information Overload and Health Anxiety.","authors":"Hae Yeon Seo, Wei Peng, Sultana Ismet Jerin","doi":"10.1177/08901171261446080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study explores how internet use can undermine patient engagement through information overload and health anxiety, and how patient-centered communication (PCC) may buffer or reshape these effects.DesignA cross-sectional survey design was used.SettingThe study conducted online survey through Qualtrics.SampleA random sample of U.S. adults aged 18 or older completed online survey for $2.30 compensation. After excluding ineligible responses, the final sample was included for the analysis (<i>N</i> = 356).MeasuresKey variables included internet use, information overload, health anxiety, patient engagement, and PCC, demonstrating high reliability.AnalysisSimple mediation analysis and moderated mediation analysis were conducted.ResultsSimple mediation analysis showed that internet use was positively associated with information overload which increased health anxiety (indirect effect = 0.013, 95% CI [0.002, 0.027]). The indirect effect of internet use on engagement was significant at low (-1 SD; PCC = 2.798; <i>b</i> = -0.005, 95% CI [-0.011, -0.002]), and medium levels of PCC (mean; PCC = 3.731; <i>b</i> = -0.003, 95% CI [-0.007, -0.001]), but not at high levels.ConclusionThis study suggests that healthcare providers should take continuing PCC education to overcome generic barriers that patients encounter both online and in clinical settings, thereby improving health outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171261446080"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171261446080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study explores how internet use can undermine patient engagement through information overload and health anxiety, and how patient-centered communication (PCC) may buffer or reshape these effects.DesignA cross-sectional survey design was used.SettingThe study conducted online survey through Qualtrics.SampleA random sample of U.S. adults aged 18 or older completed online survey for $2.30 compensation. After excluding ineligible responses, the final sample was included for the analysis (N = 356).MeasuresKey variables included internet use, information overload, health anxiety, patient engagement, and PCC, demonstrating high reliability.AnalysisSimple mediation analysis and moderated mediation analysis were conducted.ResultsSimple mediation analysis showed that internet use was positively associated with information overload which increased health anxiety (indirect effect = 0.013, 95% CI [0.002, 0.027]). The indirect effect of internet use on engagement was significant at low (-1 SD; PCC = 2.798; b = -0.005, 95% CI [-0.011, -0.002]), and medium levels of PCC (mean; PCC = 3.731; b = -0.003, 95% CI [-0.007, -0.001]), but not at high levels.ConclusionThis study suggests that healthcare providers should take continuing PCC education to overcome generic barriers that patients encounter both online and in clinical settings, thereby improving health outcomes.

网络使用与患者参与:以患者为中心的沟通对信息超载和健康焦虑的调节作用。
目的本研究探讨互联网使用如何通过信息超载和健康焦虑破坏患者参与,以及以患者为中心的沟通(PCC)如何缓冲或重塑这些影响。设计采用横断面调查设计。该研究通过qualics进行了在线调查。抽样:随机抽取18岁以上的美国成年人完成在线调查,获得2.30美元的补偿。在排除不合格的应答后,纳入最终样本进行分析(N = 356)。主要变量包括互联网使用、信息超载、健康焦虑、患者参与和PCC,显示出高可靠性。分析进行简单中介分析和有调节中介分析。结果简单中介分析显示,网络使用与信息超载增加健康焦虑呈正相关(间接效应= 0.013,95% CI[0.002, 0.027])。互联网使用对敬业度的间接影响在低(-1 SD; PCC = 2.798; b = -0.005, 95% CI[-0.011, -0.002])和中等PCC水平(平均;PCC = 3.731; b = -0.003, 95% CI[-0.007, -0.001])显著,但在高水平上不显著。结论:本研究提示医疗服务提供者应采取持续的PCC教育,以克服患者在网上和临床环境中遇到的通用障碍,从而改善健康结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书