Subcutaneous Wound Management in Complex, Contaminated Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (AWR) - The "French Fry" Technique.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-30 DOI:10.1177/00031348261448885
Samantha W Kerr, Lucy R Hinton, Victoria L Walker, Alynna J Wiley, Gregory T Scarola, Sullivan A Ayuso, B Todd Heniford
{"title":"Subcutaneous Wound Management in Complex, Contaminated Abdominal Wall Reconstruction (AWR) - The \"French Fry\" Technique.","authors":"Samantha W Kerr, Lucy R Hinton, Victoria L Walker, Alynna J Wiley, Gregory T Scarola, Sullivan A Ayuso, B Todd Heniford","doi":"10.1177/00031348261448885","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionPrimary closure of contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) wounds carries significant wound complication risks. Vacuum-assisted, delayed primary closure (VADPC) improves outcomes but requires a second anesthetic. The \"French fry\" technique (FFT) utilizes VA benefits without reoperation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of FFT in complex, contaminated AWR.MethodsA single center's open AWRs (CDC class 2-4) managed with FFT were reviewed. Technique: incision is closed except for small gaps to place subcutaneous 1 × 1 × 8cm NPWT foam \"French fries\" at 5-6 cm intervals under an incisional NPWT (-125 mmHg). FF are removed POD3 at the bedside and precise measurement is taken to assure all FFs are accounted for. Incisional NPWT is continued. Primary outcome included wound complications compared to Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks (CeDAR) predictions.ResultsTwenty-seven AWR patients (BMI 31.6 ± 5.9 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; 40.7% diabetic; 66.7% recurrent hernias; 100% CDC wound class 2-4; massive defect size 384.2 ± 143.8 cm<sup>2</sup>) underwent FFT. Biologic mesh was placed in 74.1% of cases; 18.5% of defects were closed primarily. Fascial closure was achieved in 92.6%. CeDAR-predicted wound complication rate was 53.8%. Observed wound complication rate was 25.9%, including infection (14.8%) requiring intervention, with 7.4% requiring reopening of their wounds. There were no mesh infections and no hernia recurrences over average follow-up of 8.2 ± 19.8 months.ConclusionFFT is a practical, single-stage, strategy for contaminated AWR, reducing complications compared to predicted risk.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"2531-2538"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348261448885","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionPrimary closure of contaminated abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) wounds carries significant wound complication risks. Vacuum-assisted, delayed primary closure (VADPC) improves outcomes but requires a second anesthetic. The "French fry" technique (FFT) utilizes VA benefits without reoperation. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of FFT in complex, contaminated AWR.MethodsA single center's open AWRs (CDC class 2-4) managed with FFT were reviewed. Technique: incision is closed except for small gaps to place subcutaneous 1 × 1 × 8cm NPWT foam "French fries" at 5-6 cm intervals under an incisional NPWT (-125 mmHg). FF are removed POD3 at the bedside and precise measurement is taken to assure all FFs are accounted for. Incisional NPWT is continued. Primary outcome included wound complications compared to Carolinas Equation for Determining Associated Risks (CeDAR) predictions.ResultsTwenty-seven AWR patients (BMI 31.6 ± 5.9 kg/m2; 40.7% diabetic; 66.7% recurrent hernias; 100% CDC wound class 2-4; massive defect size 384.2 ± 143.8 cm2) underwent FFT. Biologic mesh was placed in 74.1% of cases; 18.5% of defects were closed primarily. Fascial closure was achieved in 92.6%. CeDAR-predicted wound complication rate was 53.8%. Observed wound complication rate was 25.9%, including infection (14.8%) requiring intervention, with 7.4% requiring reopening of their wounds. There were no mesh infections and no hernia recurrences over average follow-up of 8.2 ± 19.8 months.ConclusionFFT is a practical, single-stage, strategy for contaminated AWR, reducing complications compared to predicted risk.

复杂污染腹壁重建(AWR)的皮下伤口处理-“炸薯条”技术。
受污染的腹壁重建术(AWR)伤口的初级闭合具有显著的伤口并发症风险。真空辅助延迟一期缝合(VADPC)可改善预后,但需要二次麻醉。“炸薯条”技术(FFT)利用VA的好处而无需再次手术。本研究的目的是评估FFT在复杂污染AWR中的效果。方法回顾性分析采用FFT处理的单中心开放式awr (CDC 2-4级)。技术:在切口NPWT (-125 mmHg)下,除小间隙外关闭切口,每隔5-6厘米放置皮下1 × 1 × 8cm的NPWT泡沫“薯条”。在床边将FF移除,并进行精确测量,以确保所有FF都被计算在内。切口NPWT继续进行。主要结局包括伤口并发症与卡罗来纳相关风险方程(CeDAR)预测结果的比较。结果27例AWR患者(BMI 31.6±5.9 kg/m2,糖尿病占40.7%,复发疝占66.7%,CDC创面2-4级占100%,大面积缺损384.2±143.8 cm2)行FFT。74.1%的病例放置生物补片;18.5%的缺陷已初步关闭。筋膜闭合率为92.6%。cedar预测伤口并发症发生率为53.8%。观察到伤口并发症发生率为25.9%,其中感染(14.8%)需要干预,7.4%需要重新开放伤口。平均随访8.2±19.8个月,无补片感染,无疝复发。结论fft是一种实用的单阶段治疗AWR污染的策略,与预测的风险相比,可以减少并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书