Impact of Geographic Distance and Prehospital Delay on Mortality and Functional Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Low-Resource Setting.

IF 1.3 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Acute Medicine & Surgery Pub Date : 2026-04-28 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1002/ams2.70131
Syed Shayan Shah, Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Adnan Khan, Syed Jawad Ahmad, Sadia Shafique
{"title":"Impact of Geographic Distance and Prehospital Delay on Mortality and Functional Outcomes in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in a Low-Resource Setting.","authors":"Syed Shayan Shah, Muhammad Nawaz Khan, Muhammad Sohaib Khan, Adnan Khan, Syed Jawad Ahmad, Sadia Shafique","doi":"10.1002/ams2.70131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where prehospital delays and geographic barriers may adversely impact outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study included 1068 consecutive patients with severe TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 9) admitted to Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, in 2024. Variables were incident-to-presentation delay, distance, in-hospital timings to surgery, severity markers, mortality, and discharge Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Patients were stratified by urban or rural area according to the place of incident. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The In-hospital mortality was 12.2%, and poor outcomes (GOS ≤ 3) were observed in 95.9%. The median delay before presentation was 6 h (IQR 3-9), with a median distance of 70 km (IQR 6-210). Delays were significantly longer in rural patients (median 9 vs. 3 h in urban areas, <i>p</i> < 0.001), and distances to presentation were also greater (median 180 km vs. 40 km, <i>p</i> < 0.001), with rural patients accounting for 72%. The median in-hospital intervention time was 42 min. No significant differences in mortality were found between the high-delay and high-distance groups (13.1% vs. 11.3%, <i>p</i> = 0.41; 12.8% vs. 11.6%, <i>p</i> = 0.62) or between rural and urban patients (12.5% vs. 11.4%, <i>p</i> = 0.69). Multivariable analysis demonstrated no independent association between geographic factors and mortality after adjustment for injury severity.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disparities in prehospital access were observed; however, no independent association between geographic factors and in-hospital mortality among admitted patients was identified. Functional outcomes remained poor.</p>","PeriodicalId":7196,"journal":{"name":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","volume":"13 ","pages":"e70131"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13125372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acute Medicine & Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ams2.70131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) disproportionately affects low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), where prehospital delays and geographic barriers may adversely impact outcomes.

Methods: This retrospective study included 1068 consecutive patients with severe TBI (admission Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] < 9) admitted to Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, in 2024. Variables were incident-to-presentation delay, distance, in-hospital timings to surgery, severity markers, mortality, and discharge Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS). Patients were stratified by urban or rural area according to the place of incident. Statistical analyses included the Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and multivariable logistic regression.

Results: The In-hospital mortality was 12.2%, and poor outcomes (GOS ≤ 3) were observed in 95.9%. The median delay before presentation was 6 h (IQR 3-9), with a median distance of 70 km (IQR 6-210). Delays were significantly longer in rural patients (median 9 vs. 3 h in urban areas, p < 0.001), and distances to presentation were also greater (median 180 km vs. 40 km, p < 0.001), with rural patients accounting for 72%. The median in-hospital intervention time was 42 min. No significant differences in mortality were found between the high-delay and high-distance groups (13.1% vs. 11.3%, p = 0.41; 12.8% vs. 11.6%, p = 0.62) or between rural and urban patients (12.5% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.69). Multivariable analysis demonstrated no independent association between geographic factors and mortality after adjustment for injury severity.

Conclusions: Significant disparities in prehospital access were observed; however, no independent association between geographic factors and in-hospital mortality among admitted patients was identified. Functional outcomes remained poor.

地理距离和院前延误对低资源环境下严重创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率和功能结局的影响
背景:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)对低收入和中等收入国家(LMICs)的影响尤为严重,在这些国家,院前延误和地理障碍可能对预后产生不利影响。方法:回顾性研究纳入1068例连续重度脑外伤患者(入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表[GCS])。结果:住院死亡率为12.2%,不良预后(GOS≤3)者占95.9%。出现前的中位延迟为6小时(IQR 3-9),中位距离为70公里(IQR 6-210)。农村患者延迟时间明显更长(城市患者中位数9小时比3小时,p = 0.41; 12.8%比11.6%,p = 0.62),农村和城市患者延迟时间明显更长(12.5%比11.4%,p = 0.69)。多变量分析表明,在调整损伤严重程度后,地理因素与死亡率之间没有独立的关联。结论:院前可及性存在显著差异;然而,没有发现地理因素与住院患者住院死亡率之间的独立关联。功能结果仍然很差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acute Medicine & Surgery
Acute Medicine & Surgery MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
12.50%
发文量
87
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书