Insights Into Density Functional Performance From a Main-Group and Transition-Metal Molecular Benchmark.

IF 4.8 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Yiwei Liu, Lijie Wei, Shuai Tao, Yichu Wu, Fanhong Wu, Ying Wang, Xiao He
{"title":"Insights Into Density Functional Performance From a Main-Group and Transition-Metal Molecular Benchmark.","authors":"Yiwei Liu, Lijie Wei, Shuai Tao, Yichu Wu, Fanhong Wu, Ying Wang, Xiao He","doi":"10.1002/jcc.70388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Density functional theory (DFT) is widely used for modeling molecular energetics, yet the accuracy of density functionals strongly depends on the chemical environment, making reliable functional selection across diverse applications. To facilitate the rational selection of functionals, we systematically assess the performance of 26 density functionals across six representative classes of molecular energetics, including reaction barriers, polar σ-bond dissociation, ionization energies, metal-ligand dissociation, catalytic barrier heights, and strongly correlated 3d transition-metal complexes. By jointly analyzing datasets spanning both main-group and transition-metal chemistry, this work provides a cross-domain assessment of functional performance across chemically distinct regimes. Our results indicate that functional transferability between these two domains tends to be constrained, with relatively few hybrid meta-NGAs and hybrid meta-GGAs (e.g., CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ)) demonstrating comparatively balanced accuracy across diverse datasets, while multi-reference cases remain challenging for all functionals considered. The dataset-specific analysis provides practical insights for functional selection: HSE06-D3(BJ), PBE-D3(BJ), and M06-2X-D3(0) functionals perform well for main-group reaction barriers, while CF22D, M06-D3(0), M06 and MN15 functionals are more reliable for polar bond dissociation. For transition-metal energetics, CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ), and HSE06-D3(BJ) functionals offer robust performance. Overall, this study delineates the strengths and limitations of modern density-functional approximations and offers data-driven guidance for functional selection in heterogeneous molecular problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","volume":"47 12","pages":"e70388"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jcc.70388","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Density functional theory (DFT) is widely used for modeling molecular energetics, yet the accuracy of density functionals strongly depends on the chemical environment, making reliable functional selection across diverse applications. To facilitate the rational selection of functionals, we systematically assess the performance of 26 density functionals across six representative classes of molecular energetics, including reaction barriers, polar σ-bond dissociation, ionization energies, metal-ligand dissociation, catalytic barrier heights, and strongly correlated 3d transition-metal complexes. By jointly analyzing datasets spanning both main-group and transition-metal chemistry, this work provides a cross-domain assessment of functional performance across chemically distinct regimes. Our results indicate that functional transferability between these two domains tends to be constrained, with relatively few hybrid meta-NGAs and hybrid meta-GGAs (e.g., CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ)) demonstrating comparatively balanced accuracy across diverse datasets, while multi-reference cases remain challenging for all functionals considered. The dataset-specific analysis provides practical insights for functional selection: HSE06-D3(BJ), PBE-D3(BJ), and M06-2X-D3(0) functionals perform well for main-group reaction barriers, while CF22D, M06-D3(0), M06 and MN15 functionals are more reliable for polar bond dissociation. For transition-metal energetics, CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ), and HSE06-D3(BJ) functionals offer robust performance. Overall, this study delineates the strengths and limitations of modern density-functional approximations and offers data-driven guidance for functional selection in heterogeneous molecular problems.

从主族和过渡金属分子基准对密度功能性能的见解。
密度泛函理论(DFT)广泛用于分子能量学建模,但密度泛函的准确性在很大程度上取决于化学环境,从而在不同的应用中进行可靠的功能选择。为了促进官能团的合理选择,我们系统地评估了26个密度官能团在6类具有代表性的分子能量学中的表现,包括反应势垒、极性σ键解离、电离能、金属-配体解离、催化势垒高度和强相关的三维过渡金属配合物。通过联合分析跨越主族和过渡金属化学的数据集,这项工作提供了跨化学不同体制的功能性能的跨领域评估。我们的研究结果表明,这两个领域之间的功能可转移性往往受到限制,相对较少的混合元nga和混合元gga(例如,CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ))在不同的数据集上表现出相对平衡的准确性,而多参考案例对所有考虑的功能仍然具有挑战性。针对数据集的分析为功能选择提供了实用的见解:HSE06-D3(BJ)、PBE-D3(BJ)和M06- x2 - d3(0)功能在主基团反应屏障上表现良好,而CF22D、M06- d3(0)、M06和MN15功能在极性键解离方面更可靠。对于过渡金属能量学,CF22D, PW6B95-D3(BJ)和HSE06-D3(BJ)功能提供了强大的性能。总的来说,本研究描述了现代密度泛函近似的优势和局限性,并为异质分子问题中的功能选择提供了数据驱动的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
3.30%
发文量
247
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: This distinguished journal publishes articles concerned with all aspects of computational chemistry: analytical, biological, inorganic, organic, physical, and materials. The Journal of Computational Chemistry presents original research, contemporary developments in theory and methodology, and state-of-the-art applications. Computational areas that are featured in the journal include ab initio and semiempirical quantum mechanics, density functional theory, molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics, statistical mechanics, cheminformatics, biomolecular structure prediction, molecular design, and bioinformatics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书