Measuring security posture of NAS third-party packages ecosystem: an empirical analysis

IF 3.1 2区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Jianbin Xu, Cheng Huang, Yutong Zeng, Jianguo Zhao, Tao Leng, Pin Yang
{"title":"Measuring security posture of NAS third-party packages ecosystem: an empirical analysis","authors":"Jianbin Xu,&nbsp;Cheng Huang,&nbsp;Yutong Zeng,&nbsp;Jianguo Zhao,&nbsp;Tao Leng,&nbsp;Pin Yang","doi":"10.1007/s10515-026-00615-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Network-Attached Storage (NAS) devices are essential in the IoT ecosystem, widely used for enterprise data exchange and personal cloud storage. Managed via web-based interfaces and network file-sharing protocols, they are increasingly integrated with cloud services, making them vulnerable to cyber threats. While previous research has focused on NAS firmware and public port security, the security of NAS third-party packages remains largely unexplored. These packages, integrated through web services and APIs, introduce new attack surfaces. To address this gap, we propose NASScanner, an analysis framework for automated package collection, preprocessing, and security assessment. Using NASScanner, we conducted the first large-scale security measurement of NAS third-party packages, analyzing 1,489 packages—the largest dataset of its kind. Our study examined third-party component security, attack mitigation measures, and sensitive information exposure. Leveraging LLM-powered binary analysis (BinaryAI) performs semantic-level function similarity detection, enabling accurate identification of insecure third-party components. Our findings reveal critical security concerns: ① Extensive vulnerabilities. 689 packages contain 36,162 vulnerabilities linked to 4,167 distinct CVEs. ② Low mitigation implementation. Only 22.3% of packages employ Position Independent Executable for security. ③ Sensitive data exposure. 45.87% of packages risk data leaks, with 23,821 instances of direct exposure on the open internet. Our findings highlight significant security risks in NAS third-party packages and provide valuable insights to enhance NAS device security.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55414,"journal":{"name":"Automated Software Engineering","volume":"33 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Automated Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10515-026-00615-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Network-Attached Storage (NAS) devices are essential in the IoT ecosystem, widely used for enterprise data exchange and personal cloud storage. Managed via web-based interfaces and network file-sharing protocols, they are increasingly integrated with cloud services, making them vulnerable to cyber threats. While previous research has focused on NAS firmware and public port security, the security of NAS third-party packages remains largely unexplored. These packages, integrated through web services and APIs, introduce new attack surfaces. To address this gap, we propose NASScanner, an analysis framework for automated package collection, preprocessing, and security assessment. Using NASScanner, we conducted the first large-scale security measurement of NAS third-party packages, analyzing 1,489 packages—the largest dataset of its kind. Our study examined third-party component security, attack mitigation measures, and sensitive information exposure. Leveraging LLM-powered binary analysis (BinaryAI) performs semantic-level function similarity detection, enabling accurate identification of insecure third-party components. Our findings reveal critical security concerns: ① Extensive vulnerabilities. 689 packages contain 36,162 vulnerabilities linked to 4,167 distinct CVEs. ② Low mitigation implementation. Only 22.3% of packages employ Position Independent Executable for security. ③ Sensitive data exposure. 45.87% of packages risk data leaks, with 23,821 instances of direct exposure on the open internet. Our findings highlight significant security risks in NAS third-party packages and provide valuable insights to enhance NAS device security.

Abstract Image

NAS第三方包生态系统安全态势测度:实证分析
网络附加存储(NAS)设备在物联网生态系统中至关重要,广泛用于企业数据交换和个人云存储。通过基于网络的接口和网络文件共享协议进行管理,它们越来越多地与云服务集成,使它们容易受到网络威胁。虽然以前的研究主要集中在NAS固件和公共端口安全性上,但NAS第三方软件包的安全性在很大程度上仍未得到探索。这些通过web服务和api集成的包引入了新的攻击面。为了解决这一差距,我们提出了NASScanner,这是一个用于自动包裹收集、预处理和安全评估的分析框架。使用NASScanner,我们对NAS第三方包进行了第一次大规模安全测量,分析了1,489个包——这是同类中最大的数据集。我们的研究检查了第三方组件安全性、攻击缓解措施和敏感信息暴露。利用llm驱动的二进制分析(BinaryAI)执行语义级功能相似性检测,从而能够准确识别不安全的第三方组件。我们的发现揭示了关键的安全问题:①广泛的漏洞。689个软件包包含36162个漏洞,与4167个不同的cve相关。②低缓解实施。只有22.3%的包使用位置独立的可执行文件来保证安全性。③敏感数据暴露。45.87%的软件包存在数据泄露的风险,其中23,821例直接暴露在开放的互联网上。我们的研究结果突出了NAS第三方软件包中的重大安全风险,并为增强NAS设备安全性提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Automated Software Engineering
Automated Software Engineering 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
11.80%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal details research, tutorial papers, survey and accounts of significant industrial experience in the foundations, techniques, tools and applications of automated software engineering technology. This includes the study of techniques for constructing, understanding, adapting, and modeling software artifacts and processes. Coverage in Automated Software Engineering examines both automatic systems and collaborative systems as well as computational models of human software engineering activities. In addition, it presents knowledge representations and artificial intelligence techniques applicable to automated software engineering, and formal techniques that support or provide theoretical foundations. The journal also includes reviews of books, software, conferences and workshops.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书