Non-human grievabilities: affective witnessing in a Facebook pet loss support group

IF 1.7 2区 社会学 Q2 GEOGRAPHY
Emotion Space and Society Pub Date : 2026-05-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-27 DOI:10.1016/j.emospa.2026.101176
Leanne Downing, Larissa Hjorth
{"title":"Non-human grievabilities: affective witnessing in a Facebook pet loss support group","authors":"Leanne Downing,&nbsp;Larissa Hjorth","doi":"10.1016/j.emospa.2026.101176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Companion animals play a central role in many contemporary households, yet grief following their death continues to be socially marginalised and unevenly recognised. This article examines how non-human grievability is negotiated within an Australian-based Facebook pet loss support group. Drawing on in-depth qualitative interviews with bereaved animal guardians, we consider grief as a relational and socially mediated emotion that becomes legible through practices of recognition and witnessing. In bringing Judith Butler's work on grievability into dialogue with Richardson and Schankweiler's discussion of affective witnessing, we explore how grief over companion animals is both affectively experienced and normatively regulated within digital environments. Participants describe navigating cultural hierarchies that downplay non-human loss while also finding validation through recursive practices of co-mourning within the group. We also show how Facebook's socio-material affordances, including closed group membership, moderation, and persistent visibility, shape how grief circulates, accumulates, and is regulated over time. In doing so, this article extends debates on grievability into digitally mediated contexts and contributes to scholarship on affect, platformed mourning and multispecies relationality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":47492,"journal":{"name":"Emotion Space and Society","volume":"59 ","pages":"Article 101176"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Emotion Space and Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755458626000307","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companion animals play a central role in many contemporary households, yet grief following their death continues to be socially marginalised and unevenly recognised. This article examines how non-human grievability is negotiated within an Australian-based Facebook pet loss support group. Drawing on in-depth qualitative interviews with bereaved animal guardians, we consider grief as a relational and socially mediated emotion that becomes legible through practices of recognition and witnessing. In bringing Judith Butler's work on grievability into dialogue with Richardson and Schankweiler's discussion of affective witnessing, we explore how grief over companion animals is both affectively experienced and normatively regulated within digital environments. Participants describe navigating cultural hierarchies that downplay non-human loss while also finding validation through recursive practices of co-mourning within the group. We also show how Facebook's socio-material affordances, including closed group membership, moderation, and persistent visibility, shape how grief circulates, accumulates, and is regulated over time. In doing so, this article extends debates on grievability into digitally mediated contexts and contributes to scholarship on affect, platformed mourning and multispecies relationality.
非人类的悲伤:Facebook宠物失去支持小组中的情感见证
在许多当代家庭中,伴侣动物扮演着核心角色,然而,它们去世后的悲伤仍然被社会边缘化,并得到了不平等的认可。这篇文章探讨了非人类的申诉是如何在澳大利亚的Facebook宠物损失支持小组内进行谈判的。通过对失去亲人的动物监护人进行深入的定性访谈,我们认为悲伤是一种关系和社会中介的情感,通过识别和见证的实践变得清晰。通过将Judith Butler关于悲伤的研究与Richardson和Schankweiler关于情感见证的讨论进行对话,我们探索了伴侣动物的悲伤是如何在数字环境中得到情感体验和规范调节的。参与者描述了他们如何驾驭文化等级制度,这种文化等级制度淡化了非人类的损失,同时也通过群体内共同哀悼的递归实践找到了有效性。我们还展示了Facebook的社会物质支持,包括封闭的群组成员、节制和持续可见性,如何塑造悲伤的循环、积累和随时间的调节。在此过程中,本文将关于悲伤的辩论扩展到数字媒介环境中,并为情感、平台哀悼和多物种关系方面的学术研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
45
审稿时长
45 days
期刊介绍: Emotion, Space and Society aims to provide a forum for interdisciplinary debate on theoretically informed research on the emotional intersections between people and places. These aims are broadly conceived to encourage investigations of feelings and affect in various spatial and social contexts, environments and landscapes. Questions of emotion are relevant to several different disciplines, and the editors welcome submissions from across the full spectrum of the humanities and social sciences. The journal editorial and presentational structure and style will demonstrate the richness generated by an interdisciplinary engagement with emotions and affects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书