Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in southwestern German soils: sources, cancer risks and policy implications

IF 6 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Environmental Sciences Europe Pub Date : 2026-03-23 Epub Date: 2026-05-01 DOI:10.1186/s12302-026-01362-3
Mark M. Scerri, Kristin Haas, Adam Gauci, Thomas Schiedek
{"title":"Atmospheric deposition of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in southwestern German soils: sources, cancer risks and policy implications","authors":"Mark M. Scerri,&nbsp;Kristin Haas,&nbsp;Adam Gauci,&nbsp;Thomas Schiedek","doi":"10.1186/s12302-026-01362-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) comprise a group of persistent carcinogenic pollutants whose transfer from air to soil via the atmospheric deposition represents a major chronic exposure pathway. Regulatory frameworks across Europe and beyond rely heavily on single compound indicators such as benzo[a]pyrene and focus predominantly on point source contamination, creating potential blind spots for contamination by deposition. This observational study quantified concentrations, identified emission sources and assessed the lifetime cancer risk of 20 PAHs in 97 topsoil samples from four locations in southwestern Germany.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>The total concentrations of the 16 USEPA priority pollutants ranged from 52 to 3956 µg/kg, with median values between 214 µg/kg (Hunsrück) and 371 µg/kg (Saarland/Palatinate Forest). Most sites (76%) were classified as “not” or “weakly” contaminated, while 12% were “heavily contaminated”. PMF identified four major sources accounting for 97% of the total PAH mass: coal/coke combustion (34.5%), biomass combustion (9.8%), petrogenic sources (15.8%) and combustion of liquid fuels from vehicles and stationary sources (37.0%). A Monte Carlo based cancer risk assessment for ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation indicated cumulative risks between 10<sup>–4</sup>–10<sup>–6</sup>, with ingestion and dermal contact as the dominant pathways. Localized hotspots with elevated risks were identified, indicating the need for site specific follow up.</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Liquid fuel combustion represents the dominant process influencing soil contamination by atmospherically deposited polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the study area. While measured concentrations at most sites remain within current regulatory limits, the cumulative toxicity of PAH mixtures results in cancer risks that are not negligible. These findings point to a structural limitation in existing EU and national soil protection frameworks (e.g., the German BBodSchG/BBodSchV), which remain primarily oriented toward contamination from identifiable point sources and do not adequately account for diffuse deposition-driven inputs. Consequently, soils affected by atmospheric PAH deposition may fall outside current regulatory attention despite carrying a cumulative toxic burden of potential relevance for human health. Strengthening soil quality assessment approaches to incorporate cumulative toxicity metrics and deposition-driven contamination pathways would improve health protection and better align soil policy with contemporary emission patterns.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture><span>The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.</span></div></div></figure></div><h3>Article highlights</h3><ol>\n <li>\n <span>1.</span>\n \n <p>Soils in the study area were mostly “not” or weakly contaminated by PAHs.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>2.</span>\n \n <p>4 PAH sources were identified, with liquid fuel combustion as the main contributor.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>3.</span>\n \n <p>Cancer risks are generally low but non-negligible, with localized hotspots.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>4.</span>\n \n <p>Soil quality standards underestimate risk associated to cumulative PAH toxicity.</p>\n \n </li>\n <li>\n <span>5.</span>\n \n <p>EU and national soil policies should integrate diffuse deposition and cumulative toxicity.</p>\n \n </li>\n </ol><h3>Policy relevance statement</h3><p>This study demonstrates that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in soils dominated by diffuse atmospheric deposition could potentially have non-negligible human health risks. Traffic/fuel combustion in domestic heaters is the dominant contributor to this contamination. Current soil protection frameworks at both EU and national levels remain inadequate, as they do not adequately address non-negligible health risks associated with cumulative PAH toxicity under diffuse contamination scenarios. Integrating atmospheric inputs and cumulative toxicity metrics into the forthcoming EU Soil Monitoring Law as well as in national standards is essential to ensure realistic risk assessment and effective soil quality management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":546,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Sciences Europe","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1186/s12302-026-01362-3.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Sciences Europe","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12302-026-01362-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/5/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) comprise a group of persistent carcinogenic pollutants whose transfer from air to soil via the atmospheric deposition represents a major chronic exposure pathway. Regulatory frameworks across Europe and beyond rely heavily on single compound indicators such as benzo[a]pyrene and focus predominantly on point source contamination, creating potential blind spots for contamination by deposition. This observational study quantified concentrations, identified emission sources and assessed the lifetime cancer risk of 20 PAHs in 97 topsoil samples from four locations in southwestern Germany.

Results

The total concentrations of the 16 USEPA priority pollutants ranged from 52 to 3956 µg/kg, with median values between 214 µg/kg (Hunsrück) and 371 µg/kg (Saarland/Palatinate Forest). Most sites (76%) were classified as “not” or “weakly” contaminated, while 12% were “heavily contaminated”. PMF identified four major sources accounting for 97% of the total PAH mass: coal/coke combustion (34.5%), biomass combustion (9.8%), petrogenic sources (15.8%) and combustion of liquid fuels from vehicles and stationary sources (37.0%). A Monte Carlo based cancer risk assessment for ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation indicated cumulative risks between 10–4–10–6, with ingestion and dermal contact as the dominant pathways. Localized hotspots with elevated risks were identified, indicating the need for site specific follow up.

Conclusions

Liquid fuel combustion represents the dominant process influencing soil contamination by atmospherically deposited polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the study area. While measured concentrations at most sites remain within current regulatory limits, the cumulative toxicity of PAH mixtures results in cancer risks that are not negligible. These findings point to a structural limitation in existing EU and national soil protection frameworks (e.g., the German BBodSchG/BBodSchV), which remain primarily oriented toward contamination from identifiable point sources and do not adequately account for diffuse deposition-driven inputs. Consequently, soils affected by atmospheric PAH deposition may fall outside current regulatory attention despite carrying a cumulative toxic burden of potential relevance for human health. Strengthening soil quality assessment approaches to incorporate cumulative toxicity metrics and deposition-driven contamination pathways would improve health protection and better align soil policy with contemporary emission patterns.

Graphical Abstract

The alternative text for this image may have been generated using AI.

Article highlights

  1. 1.

    Soils in the study area were mostly “not” or weakly contaminated by PAHs.

  2. 2.

    4 PAH sources were identified, with liquid fuel combustion as the main contributor.

  3. 3.

    Cancer risks are generally low but non-negligible, with localized hotspots.

  4. 4.

    Soil quality standards underestimate risk associated to cumulative PAH toxicity.

  5. 5.

    EU and national soil policies should integrate diffuse deposition and cumulative toxicity.

Policy relevance statement

This study demonstrates that polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) contamination in soils dominated by diffuse atmospheric deposition could potentially have non-negligible human health risks. Traffic/fuel combustion in domestic heaters is the dominant contributor to this contamination. Current soil protection frameworks at both EU and national levels remain inadequate, as they do not adequately address non-negligible health risks associated with cumulative PAH toxicity under diffuse contamination scenarios. Integrating atmospheric inputs and cumulative toxicity metrics into the forthcoming EU Soil Monitoring Law as well as in national standards is essential to ensure realistic risk assessment and effective soil quality management.

德国西南部土壤中多环芳烃的大气沉降:来源、癌症风险和政策影响
多环芳烃(PAHs)是一组持久性致癌污染物,其通过大气沉降从空气转移到土壤是一种主要的慢性暴露途径。整个欧洲和其他地区的监管框架严重依赖于单一化合物指标,如苯并[a]芘,并主要关注点源污染,为沉积污染创造了潜在的盲点。这项观察性研究量化了德国西南部四个地点的97个表土样本中20种多环芳烃的浓度,确定了排放源,并评估了其终生癌症风险。结果16种USEPA重点污染物的总浓度在52 ~ 3956µg/kg之间,中位数在214µg/kg (hunsrck)和371µg/kg (Saarland/Palatinate Forest)之间。大多数站点(76%)被归类为“未”或“弱”污染,而12%的站点被归类为“严重污染”。PMF确定了四个主要来源,占多环芳烃总质量的97%:煤/焦炭燃烧(34.5%),生物质燃烧(9.8%),岩石源(15.8%)以及车辆和固定源的液体燃料燃烧(37.0%)。一项基于蒙特卡罗的摄入、皮肤接触和吸入的癌症风险评估表明,累积风险在10-4-10-6之间,摄入和皮肤接触是主要途径。确定了风险较高的局部热点,表明需要针对具体地点开展后续工作。结论液体燃料燃烧是影响研究区大气沉积多环芳烃污染的主要过程。虽然在大多数地点测量的浓度仍在目前的监管限制范围内,但多环芳烃混合物的累积毒性导致的癌症风险不容忽视。这些发现指出了现有欧盟和国家土壤保护框架(例如,德国BBodSchG/BBodSchV)的结构性限制,这些框架仍然主要面向可识别的点源污染,没有充分考虑弥漫性沉积驱动的输入。因此,受大气多环芳烃沉积影响的土壤可能不受目前监管机构的关注,尽管其累积毒性负担可能与人类健康相关。加强土壤质量评估方法,将累积毒性指标和沉积物驱动的污染途径纳入其中,将改善对健康的保护,并使土壤政策更好地与当代排放模式保持一致。此图像的替代文本可能是使用AI生成的。文章亮点1;研究区土壤多环芳烃污染基本为“不”或“弱”。2. 确定了4个多环芳烃源,其中液体燃料燃烧是主要来源。3. 癌症风险一般较低,但不可忽视,有局部热点。4. 土壤质量标准低估了与累积多环芳烃毒性相关的风险。5. 欧盟和各国的土壤政策应结合弥漫性沉积和累积性毒性。政策相关性声明本研究表明,以弥漫性大气沉降为主的土壤中多环芳烃(PAH)污染可能对人类健康造成不可忽视的潜在风险。家用加热器中的交通/燃料燃烧是造成这种污染的主要原因。目前欧盟和国家一级的土壤保护框架仍然不充分,因为它们没有充分解决在弥漫性污染情景下与累积多环芳烃毒性相关的不可忽视的健康风险。将大气输入和累积毒性指标纳入即将出台的欧盟土壤监测法以及国家标准,对于确保现实的风险评估和有效的土壤质量管理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Sciences Europe
Environmental Sciences Europe Environmental Science-Pollution
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.70%
发文量
110
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: ESEU is an international journal, focusing primarily on Europe, with a broad scope covering all aspects of environmental sciences, including the main topic regulation. ESEU will discuss the entanglement between environmental sciences and regulation because, in recent years, there have been misunderstandings and even disagreement between stakeholders in these two areas. ESEU will help to improve the comprehension of issues between environmental sciences and regulation. ESEU will be an outlet from the German-speaking (DACH) countries to Europe and an inlet from Europe to the DACH countries regarding environmental sciences and regulation. Moreover, ESEU will facilitate the exchange of ideas and interaction between Europe and the DACH countries regarding environmental regulatory issues. Although Europe is at the center of ESEU, the journal will not exclude the rest of the world, because regulatory issues pertaining to environmental sciences can be fully seen only from a global perspective.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书