A review of early warning systems for storm-induced coastal flooding and erosion on wave-dominated open coasts.

Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures Pub Date : 2026-01-16 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.1017/cft.2026.10026
Oscar Ferreira
{"title":"A review of early warning systems for storm-induced coastal flooding and erosion on wave-dominated open coasts.","authors":"Oscar Ferreira","doi":"10.1017/cft.2026.10026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Early warning systems for coastal erosion and flooding are currently primarily designed for local applications, offering high-resolution, site-specific predictions. Only a few early warning systems (EWS) are used at large regional or national scales. There is also a lack of standardised indicators and thresholds, which vary widely across systems and hinder cross-regional applicability. While current EWS perform well in binary hazard detection (Yes/No hazard; 80-95% accuracy), they struggle to accurately classify intermediate hazard levels. A lack of comprehensive field datasets has impeded rigorous validation for most systems, with many assessments relying on qualitative observations. Improving the reliability of the EWS requires improving their validation against field data obtained during storms and regular updating of the topobathymetric data to include the actual pre-storm morphology. Currently, most EWS rely on outdated or synthetic morphological inputs, which increases prediction uncertainty. The computational constraints of physics-based models may prevent warnings from being issued in time and have led to the adoption of surrogate approaches that depend on robust training datasets. Furthermore, most systems focus solely on hazard detection, paying limited attention to the risk to assets or populations. Future development must prioritise stakeholder engagement and the co-design of systems that incorporate both hazard and risk assessments, in order to improve their usefulness and facilitate decision-making by end users.</p>","PeriodicalId":520999,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures","volume":"4 ","pages":"e7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13107362/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/cft.2026.10026","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Early warning systems for coastal erosion and flooding are currently primarily designed for local applications, offering high-resolution, site-specific predictions. Only a few early warning systems (EWS) are used at large regional or national scales. There is also a lack of standardised indicators and thresholds, which vary widely across systems and hinder cross-regional applicability. While current EWS perform well in binary hazard detection (Yes/No hazard; 80-95% accuracy), they struggle to accurately classify intermediate hazard levels. A lack of comprehensive field datasets has impeded rigorous validation for most systems, with many assessments relying on qualitative observations. Improving the reliability of the EWS requires improving their validation against field data obtained during storms and regular updating of the topobathymetric data to include the actual pre-storm morphology. Currently, most EWS rely on outdated or synthetic morphological inputs, which increases prediction uncertainty. The computational constraints of physics-based models may prevent warnings from being issued in time and have led to the adoption of surrogate approaches that depend on robust training datasets. Furthermore, most systems focus solely on hazard detection, paying limited attention to the risk to assets or populations. Future development must prioritise stakeholder engagement and the co-design of systems that incorporate both hazard and risk assessments, in order to improve their usefulness and facilitate decision-making by end users.

风暴引发的海岸洪水和波浪主导的开放海岸侵蚀预警系统综述。
海岸侵蚀和洪水的早期预警系统目前主要是为当地应用而设计的,提供高分辨率、特定地点的预测。只有少数早期预警系统(EWS)在大区域或国家范围内使用。还缺乏标准化的指标和阈值,这些指标和阈值在各系统之间差别很大,妨碍了跨区域的适用性。虽然目前的EWS在二元危险检测(是/否危险;80-95%的准确率)方面表现良好,但它们很难准确地对中间危险级别进行分类。缺乏全面的现场数据集阻碍了对大多数系统的严格验证,许多评估依赖于定性观察。提高EWS的可靠性需要改进其对风暴期间获得的现场数据的验证,并定期更新地形水深数据,以包括实际的风暴前形态。目前,大多数EWS依赖于过时的或合成的形态输入,这增加了预测的不确定性。基于物理的模型的计算限制可能会阻止及时发出警告,并导致采用依赖于稳健训练数据集的替代方法。此外,大多数系统只关注危害检测,对资产或人口的风险关注有限。未来的发展必须优先考虑利益攸关方的参与和包括危害和风险评估的系统的共同设计,以提高其实用性并促进最终用户的决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书